Re: SCSI Tape Corruption - 2nd round experiment result

2001-05-16 Thread Lorenzo Marcantonio
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: I never saw an offset different from the block size, though. Assuming you did have 32-byte errors, you had 7 errors for 1.3 GB. I have approx. 6 errors for 256 MB. But I have only 128 MB RAM. Next test: boot with mem=32M (shall I get 0

Storage - redundant path failover / failback - quo vadis linux?

2001-05-16 Thread Christoph Biardzki
Hi, I was investigating redundant path failover with FibreChannel disk devices during the last weeks. The idea is to use a second, redundant path to a storage device when the first one fails. Ideally one could also implement load balancing with these paths. The problem is really important

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Jonathan Lundell
At 12:31 PM +1000 2001-05-16, Andrew Morton wrote: When I ifconfig one of a collection of interfaces, I'm very much talking about the specific physical interface connected via a specific physical cable to a specific physical switch port. Yes, it can be a security trap as well -

Re: Storage - redundant path failover / failback - quo vadis linux?

2001-05-16 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2001-05-16T08:34:00, Christoph Biardzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I was investigating redundant path failover with FibreChannel disk devices during the last weeks. The idea is to use a second, redundant path to a storage device when the first one fails. Ideally one could also implement

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Phillips) wrote on 16.05.01 in 01051602593001.00406@starship: On Tuesday 15 May 2001 23:20, Nicolas Pitre wrote: Personally, I'd really like to see /dev/ttyS0 be the first detected serial port on a system, /dev/ttyS1 the second, etc. There are well-defined

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Timothy A. Seufert wrote: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: Driver can export a tree and we mount it on fb0. After that you have the whole set - yes, /dev/fb0/colourspace, etc. - no problem. And no need to do mknod,

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Simmons) wrote on 15.05.01 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I couldn't agree with you more. It gives me headaches at work. One note, their is a except to the eth0 thing. USB to USB networking. It uses usb0, etc. I personally which they use eth0. USB to USB networking

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H. Peter Anvin) wrote on 15.05.01 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Personally, I would also like to see network devices manifest in the filesystem namespace like everything else. Yes. Can we have a meta-rule? *Every* by-name kernel interface should have a filesystem variant. That

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Richard Gooch wrote: Alan Cox writes: len = readlink (/proc/self/3, buffer, buflen); if (strcmp (buffer + len - 2, cd) != 0) { fprintf (stderr, Not a CD-ROM! Bugger off.\n); exit (1); And on my box cd is the cabbage dicer whoops

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jonathan Lundell wrote: 2 (disk domain). I have multiple spindles on multiple SCSI adapters. So? Same deal. You don't have eth0..N, you have disk0..N. What's the problem? It's _repeatable_, in that as long as you don't

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
OK, just correct me if I get this wrong, but this code is taking the LAST 2 characters of the device name and verifying that it is cd. Which would mean that the standard states that /dev/ginsucd would be a CD-ROM drive? That is why I feel a name of a device handle shouldnt set how a

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: Linus Torvalds wrote: Now, if we just fundamentally try to think about any device as being hot-pluggable, you realize that things like which PCI slot is this device in are completely _worthless_ as device identification, because they fundamentally

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Alexander Viro
On 16 May 2001, Kai Henningsen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H. Peter Anvin) wrote on 15.05.01 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Personally, I would also like to see network devices manifest in the filesystem namespace like everything else. Yes. Can we have a meta-rule? *Every* by-name

Re: Question about ipip implementation

2001-05-16 Thread Olaf Titz
Well, I understand that ipip_rcv does some work cleaning sk_buff. But why after that sk_buff cannot be submitted to ip_rcv, not netif_rx? Oops, now I see that you're talking about ip_rcv, not netif_rx... I'm doing roughly what you're proposing in CIPE (get IP packet encapsulated in UDP

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:56:41PM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: At 12:31 PM +1000 2001-05-16, Andrew Morton wrote: When I ifconfig one of a collection of interfaces, I'm very much talking about the specific physical interface connected via a specific physical cable to a specific

RE: FW: I think I've found a serious bug in AMD Athlon page_alloc.c routines, where do I mail the developer(s) ?

2001-05-16 Thread David Wilson
Hi Mark, Thanks for getting back to me, yea I'm running my fsb at 100 alreadystill seems to be the same problem. I donno, I'm just gonna have to mess around with things till I get it right ;-) Thanks for the guidance anyways. Regards David Wilson Technical Support Centre The S.A Internet

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Helge Hafting
James Simmons wrote: I would use write except we use write to draw into the framebuffer. If I write to the framebuffer with that data the only thing that will happen is I will get pretty colors on my screen. Yes. And we also use write to send data to printer. So what? Nobody makes

Re: Getting FS access events

2001-05-16 Thread Anton Altaparmakov
At 02:30 16/05/2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Anton Altaparmakov wrote: And how are you thinking of this working without introducing new interfaces if the caches are indeed incoherent? Please correct me if I understand wrong, but when two caches are incoherent, I thought it means that the

Re: 2.4.2 - Locked keyboard

2001-05-16 Thread Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]
Yes, I did... I checked NumLock and CapsLock too, but any of this turn seems to work (the leds doesn't change the state). cat /proc/interrupts shows that IRQ1 doesn't trigger anymore. Although all services in the machine are working...(weird, isnt't it?) Regards. -Jorge

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Helge Hafting
Johannes Erdfelt wrote: I had always made the assumption that sockets were created because you couldn't easily map IPv4 semantics onto filesystems. It's unreasonable to have a file for every possible IP address/port you can communicate with. You could have open(/ipv4/127.0.0.1/80) without

ATA overlap/queuing support ?

2001-05-16 Thread David Balazic
Is there support in linux for ATA overlap/queuing ? It should ( among other things ) improve concurent performance of two devices on the same channel. -- David Balazic -- Be excellent to each other. - Bill Ted - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from this

trailing cd (rgooch) and i18n (ac)

2001-05-16 Thread eccesys
Actually, no, because it's guaranteed that a trailing /cd is a CD-ROM. That's the standard. I don't know what a cabbage dicer is (has it to do with dices?), but if it is guaranteed that cd is a cd, how are the arabican device names (extend for klinzhai, chinese, japanese etc.) supposed to be?

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:33:35PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: Agreed. However, if this thing means I cannot use the -linus tree without devfs, then it will also mean my VM stuff only gets tested on -ac kernels... No Problem. I test most of your VM stuff anyway and I use devfs on that machine

Re: rwsem, gcc3 again

2001-05-16 Thread eccesys
David, I am using the gcc-3.0 snapshot of 14.5.2001 from codesourcery (i686 binary). I have now tried to mimic CPU=386 behaviour (patch posted yesterday night) and it compiles (just sound fails), by exchanging y and n in CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK and CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM. Thanks

Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0 release decision

2001-05-16 Thread Heinz J. Mauelshagen
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:48:19PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: On Fri, 11 May 2001, Steven Lembark wrote: for my part running the system i'd rather have the production LVM and kernel releases in sync and not have to worry about it. if i need a beta/inter-version release then i'll deal

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Malcolm Beattie
Alexander Viro writes: thing, we could turn mount(2) into open appropriate fs type convince the sucker that you are allowed, tell which device you want, etc. open mountpoint mount(fs_fd, dir_fd) Would work like charm, especially since we could fit the network

RE: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Chemolli Francesco (USI)
The argument that if you use numbering based on where in the SCSI chain the disk is, disks don't pop in and out is absolute crap. It's not true even for SCSI any more (there are devices that will aquire their location dynamically), and it has never been true anywhere else. Give it up.

PATCH: NCR53c406 missing release_region

2001-05-16 Thread Marcus Meissner
Hi, There was a missing release_region in NCR53c406a.c, which fscked up probing with 'modprobe NCR53c406' like one mode of our installer does. (Tested by checking the contents of /proc/ioports before and after. After modprobe it contained junk for the probed port range. It no longer does.)

PATCH: missing release_region in qlogicfas.c

2001-05-16 Thread Marcus Meissner
Hi, qlogicfas was missing a release_region in autoprobing too. Ciao, Marcus Index: drivers/scsi/qlogicfas.c === RCS file: /build/mm/work/repository/linux-mm/drivers/scsi/qlogicfas.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13

RH 7.1 on IBM xSeries 240

2001-05-16 Thread ps
I'm trying to run Linux RH 7.1 on the rack-mounted IBM xSeries 240 with ServeRAID but without success. I've tried some kernels from 2.2.19-7.0.1smp up to 2.4.3-2.14.14.i686 and 2.4.4. During boot all kernels reported errors (attached at the end). When I try to write to disk (untar 100MB)

PATCH: wd7000 missing release_region

2001-05-16 Thread Marcus Meissner
Hi, One else case in wd7000.c did not have a release_region(). Ciao, Marcus Index: drivers/scsi/wd7000.c === RCS file: /build/mm/work/repository/linux-mm/drivers/scsi/wd7000.c,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.7 wd7000.c ---

RE: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
I believe thats why there are persistant superblocks on the RAID partitions. You can switch them around, and it still knows which drive holds which RAID partition... That's the only way booting off RAID works, and the only reason for the RAID Autodetect partition type... you can find those

Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-16 Thread Matt Bernstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, [ I'm not subscribed to linux-xfs, please cc me ] We have managed to get a Debian potato system (with the 2.4 updates from http://people.debian.org/~bunk/debian plus xfs-tools which we imported from woody) to run 2.4.3-XFS. However, in testing

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Helge Hafting
Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote: The argument that if you use numbering based on where in the SCSI chain the disk is, disks don't pop in and out is absolute crap. It's not true even for SCSI any more (there are devices that will aquire their location dynamically), and it has never

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Erik Mouw
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:59:30AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 15 May 2001 23:20, Nicolas Pitre wrote: Personally, I'd really like to see /dev/ttyS0 be the first detected serial port on a system, /dev/ttyS1 the second, etc. There are well-defined rules for the first four on

[PATCH] turn device_init() into an initcall

2001-05-16 Thread Alexander Viro
Damn. /me writes a patch /me tests and finds an obvious typo /me fixes and diffs fixed (and tested) version /me sends the original one. My apologies. Correct patch (taken between clean tree and result of make distclean on the tree that gave a kernel that passes all tests) follows. Please, apply

Hidden interfaces on 2.4.x kernels

2001-05-16 Thread rsaura
Hi all. Several months ago I set up a lvs cluster on smtp servers on 2.2.16 kernels, which now I'm planning to move to 2.4.4. I am using direct routing alternative so I configure a lo:0 interface with the address of the virtualserver on every local node so it can

kernel2.2 to kernel2.4!!

2001-05-16 Thread Jalajadevi Ganapathy
Hi , I encounter an unresolved symbol __bad_udelay when i ported a network driver from kernel2.2 to 2.4. Could anyone plz tell me what is the corresponding fxn in 2.4?? Thanks Jalaja - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL

[PATCH] rootfs (part 1)

2001-05-16 Thread Alexander Viro
Linus, patch is the first chunk of rootfs stuff. I've tried to get it as small as possible - all it does is addition of absolute root on ramfs and necessary changes to mount_root/change_root/sys_pivot_root and follow_dotdot. Real root is mounted atop of the absolute one. More

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Oystein Viggen
Quoth Helge Hafting: This could be extended to non-raid use - i.e. use the raid autodetect partition type for non-raid as well. The autodetect routine could then create /dev/partitions/home, /dev/partitions/usr or /dev/partitions/name_of_my_choice for autodetect partitions not

Read-only memory on x86?

2001-05-16 Thread A Dell'elce
Probably it is somewhere hidden on a faq.. but I will ask again ... Can I set a memory area or page to be read-only, i.e. generate an interrupt when writing is attempted to a certain page/area? Thanks, Antonio = Antonio Dell'elce * http://www.dellelce.com/MyHome/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Thomas Kotzian
From: Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Partition id's seems more interesting than disk id's - we normally mount partitions not whole disks. RAID do this well - the raid autodetect partition stores an ID in the last block, the remaining N-1 blocks are available for a fs. This could be

Re: 2.4.2 - Locked keyboard

2001-05-16 Thread Chris Meadors
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2001, Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] wrote: After the reboot, the keyboard was working 5 minutes and then it locked. The console was working. I rebooted the machine again and has been working for 2 days, that the keyboard gets

Re: kernel2.2 to kernel2.4!!

2001-05-16 Thread Brian Gerst
Jalajadevi Ganapathy wrote: Hi , I encounter an unresolved symbol __bad_udelay when i ported a network driver from kernel2.2 to 2.4. Could anyone plz tell me what is the corresponding fxn in 2.4?? Thanks Jalaja You used too large of a value for udelay(). Switch to using mdelay() --

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Bogdan Costescu
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jonathan Lundell wrote: The 2.4 kernel allows you to rename an interface. So you can build a little database of (MAC address/name) pairs. Apply this after booting and before bringing up the interfaces and everything has the name you wanted, based on MAC address.

Re: kernel2.2 to kernel2.4!!

2001-05-16 Thread Erik Mouw
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:05:01AM -0400, Jalajadevi Ganapathy wrote: Hi , I encounter an unresolved symbol __bad_udelay when i ported a network driver from kernel2.2 to 2.4. Could anyone plz tell me what is the corresponding fxn in 2.4?? It means that you're udelay()ing way to long in that

Re: Read-only memory on x86?

2001-05-16 Thread Erik Mouw
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:10:33AM -0700, A Dell'elce wrote: Can I set a memory area or page to be read-only, i.e. generate an interrupt when writing is attempted to a certain page/area? man mmap and catch SIGSEGV. Or see how the DOSemu VGA emulator manipulates the virtual VGA memory.

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Josh Fryman
Oystein Viggen wrote: What happens if I insert a hard drive from another computer which also has partitions named home, usr, and soforth? not to belabor the obvious, but there are a lot of issues with this particular approach. for those who advocate writing some form of signature into an

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Jens Axboe
On Wed, May 16 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 15 May 2001 17:34, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2001, Neil Brown wrote: Ofcourse setting the queue function that __blk_get_queue call to do a lookup of the minor and choose an appropriate queue for the real device wont

Re: LVM 1.0 release decision

2001-05-16 Thread Heinz J. Mauelshagen
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 03:32:46PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: This leads to the dilemma, that trying to avoid further differences between our LVM releases and the stock kernel code would force us into postponing the pending LVM 1.0 release accordingly which OTOH is incovenient for the LVM

Re: kernel2.2 to kernel2.4!!

2001-05-16 Thread Jalajadevi Ganapathy
So, Is there any alternative. Archives sez not to use mdelay. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: rwsem, gcc3 again

2001-05-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:03:27AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David, I am using the gcc-3.0 snapshot of 14.5.2001 from codesourcery (i686 binary). I have now tried to mimic CPU=386 behaviour (patch posted yesterday night) and it compiles (just sound fails), by exchanging y and n in

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Jesse Pollard
Bob Glamm [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Finally, there has to be an *easy* way of identifying devices from software. You're right, I don't care if my network cards are numbered 0-1-2, 2-0-1, or in any other permutation, *as long as I can write something like this*: # start up networking for i in

parport problems with devfs

2001-05-16 Thread Nico Schottelius
Hello! I attached the problem occured with parport and devfs. I don't exactly know where the problem in the parport source is. If someone has a patch for it, I will test it. Nico # Loading the parport and parport_pc modules for my parallelport flapp:/home/user/nico/gpm-1.19.3 # modprobe

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread mike_phillips
The same situation appears when using bonding.o. For several years, Don Becker's (and derived) network drivers support changing MAC address when the interface is down. So Al's /dev/eth/n/MAC has different values depending on whether bonding is active or not. Should /dev/eth/n/MAC always

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Helge Hafting
Oystein Viggen wrote: Quoth Helge Hafting: This could be extended to non-raid use - i.e. use the raid autodetect partition type for non-raid as well. The autodetect routine could then create /dev/partitions/home, /dev/partitions/usr or /dev/partitions/name_of_my_choice for

2.4.5-pre2: Bogus ARP packets containing NFS file data?

2001-05-16 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
As the subject already says, reproduced in 2.4.5-pre2. -- Frank - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

Re: parport problems with devfs

2001-05-16 Thread Nico Schottelius
Hmm..seems you are exactly right! Sorry for that wrong though! Nico Philip Blundell wrote: I attached the problem occured with parport and devfs. I don't exactly know where the problem in the parport source is. If someone has a patch for it, I will test it. I don't think this is a bug.

CONFIG_APUS

2001-05-16 Thread mdaljeet
When is the 'CONFIG_APUS' flag used ? Daljeet Maini IBM Global Services Ltd. - Bangalore Ph. No. - 5267117 Extn 2954 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

2.4.4/2.4.5-pre2 process semi stuck in n_tty.c:write_chan

2001-05-16 Thread Andreas Schultz
Hi, I just installed a new system using 2.4.4 and later tried 2.4.5pre2 and 2.4.4ac6 and ac9. All versions show the same behaivior. When doing a cat /var/log/messages, the output slows down after the first 30 lines and comes to an almost complete stop, with a few lines showing up every 10sec

Re: parport problems with devfs

2001-05-16 Thread Philip Blundell
I attached the problem occured with parport and devfs. I don't exactly know where the problem in the parport source is. If someone has a patch for it, I will test it. I don't think this is a bug. You need to load the `lp' module. p. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: PATCH: export linux_logo_bw for hgafb.c

2001-05-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 15 May 2001, H . J . Lu wrote: Here is a patch for 2.4.4. linux_logo_bw is used in hgafb.c, which can be compiled as a module. But linux_logo_bw is not exported. H.J. --- --- linux-2.4.4-ac9/drivers/video/fbcon.c.mod Tue May 15 15:39:17 2001 +++

Re: rwsem, gcc3 again

2001-05-16 Thread David Howells
Hi Andrea: Here you go: /usr/local/bin/gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/inst-kernels/linux-2.4.5-pre2-aa/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686-DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c sys.c sys.c: In function `sys_gethostname':

Re: CONFIG_APUS

2001-05-16 Thread David Balazic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed May 16 2001 - 09:33:05 EDT : When is the 'CONFIG_APUS' flag used ? On APUS systems ( Amiga PowerUp System - amigas with PPC cards ) -- David Balazic -- Be excellent to each other. - Bill Ted - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To

Re: 2.4.5pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:42:03PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: Detailed description of 2.4.5pre2aa1 follows. 00_buffer-2 Reschedule during oom while allocating buffers, still getblk can deadlock with oom but this will hide it

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: o fixed race in wake-one LIFO in accept(2). Apache must be compiled with -DSINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT to take advantage of that. 00_wake-one-4 Backport 2.4

Re: rwsem, gcc3 again

2001-05-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:52:04PM +0100, David Howells wrote: Hi Andrea: Here you go: /usr/local/bin/gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/inst-kernels/linux-2.4.5-pre2-aa/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Jonathan Lundell
At 10:02 AM +0200 2001-05-16, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: It's also true that some buses simply don't yield up physical locations (ISA springs to mind, ISA is quite fine, you can use the i/o space as physical locations. I meant physical not as in physical-vs-virtual addresses (all ISA

Re: [PATCH] rootfs (part 1)

2001-05-16 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Al, On Wed, 16 May 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: One point that might be better done differently - since we need ramfs for boot I've just made fs/Config.in declare CONFIG_RAMFS as define_bool CONFIG_RAMFS y. If ramfs grows (e.g. gets resource limits patches from -ac) we might be

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:37:45AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: At 10:02 AM +0200 2001-05-16, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: It's also true that some buses simply don't yield up physical locations (ISA springs to mind, ISA is quite fine, you can use the i/o space as physical locations. I

No Subject

2001-05-16 Thread siva prasad
Sorry for the newbie question.. Is it true that the ipc calls like msgget(),shmget()... are not really system calls? Cos in the file asm/unistd.h where the system calls are listed as __NR_xxx we dont find the appropriate listing for the ipc calls. What I guessed was that all the ipc calls are

Re: Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-16 Thread Steve Lord
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, [ I'm not subscribed to linux-xfs, please cc me ] We have managed to get a Debian potato system (with the 2.4 updates from http://people.debian.org/~bunk/debian plus xfs-tools which we imported from woody) to run 2.4.3-XFS.

RE: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Khachaturov, Vassilii
Well, even if you spank the future violators, what about the current overlaps? E.g., the CD-ROM ioctls are overlapping with the STREAMS ioctls (the latter ones used by LiS and honored by glibc). V. -Original Message- From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Alan Cox wrote:

Re: 2.4.5pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread Douglas J. Hunley
On Wednesday 16 May 2001 09:52, Andrea Arcangeli babbled: These descriptions are very helpful. Are they available somewhere personally, I wish all kernel announcements were as nice as this. Kudos to Andrea. -- Douglas J. Hunley (Linux User #174778) http://hunley.homeip.net/

RE: IRQ usage for PCI devices, Kernel 2.4.4

2001-05-16 Thread Khachaturov, Vassilii
If your PCI devices advertised they don't mind sharing the IRQs with each other, ignore it if they're really capable of it. Otherwise, you'll probably have to force one of the drivers and/or the bios to make them use separate ones. -Original Message- From: Joachim Backes [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Jonathan Lundell
At 11:56 AM +0200 2001-05-16, Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote: We could do something like baptizing disks.. Fix some location (i.e. the absolutely last sector of the disk or the partition table or whatever) and store there some 32-bit ID (could be a random number, a progressive number, whatever).

Re: Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-16 Thread Matt Bernstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 However, in testing a directory with lots (~177000) of files, we get the following oops (copied by hand, and run through ksymoops on a Red Hat box since the Debian one segfaulted :( ) Can you describe your testing beyond using a directory with

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Jonathan Lundell
At 4:57 PM +0200 2001-05-16, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:37:45AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: At 10:02 AM +0200 2001-05-16, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: It's also true that some buses simply don't yield up physical locations (ISA springs to mind, ISA is quite

ide-floppy

2001-05-16 Thread Mark Phalan
Hi, Whenever I boot (2.4.4-ac6) I get this error message if there is a zip disk in the drive. hdb: 98288kB, 196576 blocks, 512 sector size, hdb: 98304kB, 96/64/32 CHS, 4096 kBps, 512 sector size, 2941 rpm ide-floppy: hdb: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0 The drive seems to work

Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0 release decision

2001-05-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote: Linus, Alan et al.: maybe you could think about it again and accept one larger LVM patch. Thanks. I'm all for it right now. I'm running LVM on practically all my machines and would really like to have the latest bugfixes in

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Mo McKinlay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yesterday, Timothy A. Seufert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Why not take it a step further than just devices? This is a perfect model for supporting named forks. Because this only works on filesystems where directories can't themselves have

Re: Bad udelay usage in drivers/net/aironet4500_card.c

2001-05-16 Thread H . J . Lu
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:33:12AM -0700, Jalaja Devi wrote: Hi! Could you please tell me how you fixed the udelay problem. cuz, I am encountering the same problem in my driver. I am not a kernel expert. You should ask it on the kernel mailing list. Thanks for your time, Jalaja In

Possible race in interruptible_sleep_on_timeout()

2001-05-16 Thread Richard B. Johnson
I lifted the following kernel-thread code from ../linux/drivers/net/8139too.c, just added a procedure to call. static int gpib_thread(void *unused) { unsigned long timeout; daemonize(); spin_lock_irq(current-sigmask_lock); sigemptyset(current-blocked);

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Kurt Garloff
Hi HPA, Linus, Alan, On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 12:19:34PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Linus Torvalds has requested a moratorium on new device number assignments. His hope is that a new and better method for device space handing will emerge as a result. Alan Cox has requested that I maintain

Re: rwsem, gcc3 again

2001-05-16 Thread mirabilos
Andrea, I doubt that it applies against -ac and I have only very few hard disk space, so please don't beat me I could not try... (I tried the second-to-last but it didn't apply either) But 2.4.3-ac7 works very fine with your older patch. As noticed, I now solved by CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK=y

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Miles Lane
On 16 May 2001 15:28:03 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: Oystein Viggen wrote: Quoth Helge Hafting: This could be extended to non-raid use - i.e. use the raid autodetect partition type for non-raid as well. The autodetect routine could then create /dev/partitions/home,

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Michael Meissner
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:30:46AM -0700, Miles Lane wrote: On 16 May 2001 15:28:03 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: Oystein Viggen wrote: Quoth Helge Hafting: This could be extended to non-raid use - i.e. use the raid autodetect partition type for non-raid as well. The

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Michael Meissner
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 01:18:09PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jonathan Lundell wrote: Keep it informational. And NEVER EVER make it part of the design. What about: 1 (network domain). I have two network interfaces that I connect to two different network

Re: Getting FS access events

2001-05-16 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Anton Altaparmakov wrote: True, but I was under the impression that Linus' master plan was that the two would be in entirely separate name spaces using separate cached copies of the device blocks. Nothing was said about the superblock at all. -hpa -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] at work,

Re: PATCH: export linux_logo_bw for hgafb.c

2001-05-16 Thread H . J . Lu
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:41:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2001, H . J . Lu wrote: Here is a patch for 2.4.4. linux_logo_bw is used in hgafb.c, which can be compiled as a module. But linux_logo_bw is not exported. linux_logo_bw is __initdata. How about this

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread James Simmons
At this point of the discussion I would like to point to the Device Registry patch (http://www.tjansen.de/devreg) that already solves these problems and offers stable device ids for the identification of devices and finding their /dev nodes. Does your approach solve the problem of

Re: RH 7.1 on IBM xSeries 240

2001-05-16 Thread Leah Cunningham
This may be way off, but have you flashed the BIOS to the most current revision? This machine should work properly. How many processors and what SR card are you using? ps ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010516 03:07]: - I'm trying to run Linux RH 7.1 on the rack-mounted - IBM xSeries 240 with ServeRAID

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Heinz J. Mauelshagen
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:09:32PM +0200, Thomas Kotzian wrote: From: Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Partition id's seems more interesting than disk id's - we normally mount partitions not whole disks. RAID do this well - the raid autodetect partition stores an ID in the last block,

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Hacksaw
So what is your solution for preventing a boot failure after disks/partitions change ? volume labels/UUID ? As a sys-admin, let me add a vote for this. Having (one day) a prom monitor program that looks at all the disks, and gives a menu of which one to boot from would make life so nice. I

NTFS with Win2k - Write Support broken?

2001-05-16 Thread Axel Siebenwirth
Hallo, I have a linux system with kernel 2.4.4-ac9 and a win2k partition with ntfs. Since because of the new ntfs version rw support is disabled, I wondered how much rw support is broken, why and if I could try at least. Or maybe some help is appreciated? Thanks a lot, Axel Siebenwirth - To

Re: [PATCH] rootfs (part 1)

2001-05-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: Linus, patch is the first chunk of rootfs stuff. I've tried to get it as small as possible - all it does is addition of absolute root on ramfs and necessary changes to mount_root/change_root/sys_pivot_root and follow_dotdot. Real root is

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hacksaw) writes: So what is your solution for preventing a boot failure after disks/partitions change ? volume labels/UUID ? As a sys-admin, let me add a vote for this. Having (one day) a prom monitor program that looks at all the disks, and gives a menu of which one

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

2001-05-16 Thread James Simmons
mmap is fine for a fb, but please don't remove read/write. I can now do a screendump with cat /dev/fb/0 file, because everything is a file. Having /dev/fb/0/brightness /dev/fb/0/opengl and so on seems to be a better approach. One I like to name of the file system to be something else.

Re: 2.2.20pre2aa1

2001-05-16 Thread dean gaudet
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:33:05PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: apache since 1.3.15 has defined SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT ... That's definitely a good thing. hmm, i'm not so sure -- 1.3.x is our stable release, and it sounds like this

Transmit time out on eth1 (rtl8139) / dirty entry in queue [again]

2001-05-16 Thread Axel Siebenwirth
hi, this old problem I had been faced with had been solved with 2.4.3-ac13/14, but now with kernel 2.4.4-ac9 and all other 2.4.4-acx it came up again. It's a Realtek 8139C chip on a AT2500 (allied telesyn or sumpin like that) Instead the former Apr 24 16:16:57 bello kernel: eth1: Setting

  1   2   3   4   5   >