This patch adds support to external sd card.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-db820c-pins.dtsi | 39 +++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-db820c.dtsi | 10 ++
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
This patch adds support to external sd card.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-db820c-pins.dtsi | 39 +++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8096-db820c.dtsi | 10 ++
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 4:43:30 PM CEST Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On my laptop, this adds about 1.5µs of overhead to task creation,
>> which seems to be mainly caused by vmalloc inefficiently allocating
>> individual pages
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 4:43:30 PM CEST Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On my laptop, this adds about 1.5µs of overhead to task creation,
>> which seems to be mainly caused by vmalloc inefficiently allocating
>> individual pages even when a
On 6/21/2016 9:46 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:27:27AM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
On 6/21/2016 8:50 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
The code has a few style issues (thing I'd implemented differently), but
it looks functional.
Anything in particular that you think I
On 6/21/2016 9:46 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:27:27AM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
On 6/21/2016 8:50 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
The code has a few style issues (thing I'd implemented differently), but
it looks functional.
Anything in particular that you think I
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 13:18:33 schrieb Austin S. Hemmelgarn:
Hi Austin,
> > You have to trust the host for anything, not just for the entropy in
> > timings. This is completely invalid argument unless you can present a
> > method that one guest can manipulate timings in other guest in such
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 13:18:33 schrieb Austin S. Hemmelgarn:
Hi Austin,
> > You have to trust the host for anything, not just for the entropy in
> > timings. This is completely invalid argument unless you can present a
> > method that one guest can manipulate timings in other guest in such
On Tue 21-06-16 12:57:40, Tejun Heo wrote:
> mem_cgroup_css_alloc() was returning NULL on failure while cgroup core
> expected it to return an ERR_PTR value leading to the following NULL
> deref after a css allocation failure. Fix it by return
> ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) instead. I'll also update cgroup
On Tue 21-06-16 12:57:40, Tejun Heo wrote:
> mem_cgroup_css_alloc() was returning NULL on failure while cgroup core
> expected it to return an ERR_PTR value leading to the following NULL
> deref after a css allocation failure. Fix it by return
> ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) instead. I'll also update cgroup
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:26:41 +0200
Greg Kurz wrote:
> A strange behaviour is observed when comparing PCI hotplug in QEMU, between
> x86 and pseries. If you consider the following steps:
> - start a VM
> - add a PCI device via the QEMU monitor before the rtasd has
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> From: Shunqian Zheng
>
> In .probe(), devm_kzalloc() is called with size == 0 and works only
> by luck, due to internal behavior of the allocator and the fact
> that the proper allocation size
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:26:41 +0200
Greg Kurz wrote:
> A strange behaviour is observed when comparing PCI hotplug in QEMU, between
> x86 and pseries. If you consider the following steps:
> - start a VM
> - add a PCI device via the QEMU monitor before the rtasd has started (for
> example
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> From: Shunqian Zheng
>
> In .probe(), devm_kzalloc() is called with size == 0 and works only
> by luck, due to internal behavior of the allocator and the fact
> that the proper allocation size is small. Let's use proper value for
>
On 21/06/16 17:01, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:51:57AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 07/06/16 18:38, Peter Griffin wrote:
>>> There is no point calculating the residue if there is
>>> no txstate to store the value.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin
On 6/20/16 5:31 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
Documentation/sound/alsa/timestamping.txt says:
Examples of typestamping with HDaudio:
1. DMA timestamp, no compensation for DMA+analog delay
$ ./audio_time -p --ts_type=1
On 21/06/16 17:01, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:51:57AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 07/06/16 18:38, Peter Griffin wrote:
>>> There is no point calculating the residue if there is
>>> no txstate to store the value.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin
>>> ---
On 6/20/16 5:31 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
Documentation/sound/alsa/timestamping.txt says:
Examples of typestamping with HDaudio:
1. DMA timestamp, no compensation for DMA+analog delay
$ ./audio_time -p --ts_type=1
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 10:12:24 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
>
> So this is definitely more clear then what was described earlier, and
> worries me because on many x86 machines (though fewer I guess these
> days then in the past) the clocksource will often not be the TSC (and
> have lower
On 2016-06-21 09:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
6. You have a significant lack of data regarding embedded systems, which is
one of the two biggest segments of Linux's market share. You list no
results for any pre-ARMv6 systems (Linux still runs on and is regularly used
on ARMv4 CPU's, and it's
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 10:12:24 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
>
> So this is definitely more clear then what was described earlier, and
> worries me because on many x86 machines (though fewer I guess these
> days then in the past) the clocksource will often not be the TSC (and
> have lower
On 2016-06-21 09:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
6. You have a significant lack of data regarding embedded systems, which is
one of the two biggest segments of Linux's market share. You list no
results for any pre-ARMv6 systems (Linux still runs on and is regularly used
on ARMv4 CPU's, and it's
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> So I'm leaning toward fewer cache entries per cpu, maybe just one.
> I'm all for making it a bit faster, but I think we should weigh that
> against increasing memory usage too much and thus scaring away the
>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> So I'm leaning toward fewer cache entries per cpu, maybe just one.
> I'm all for making it a bit faster, but I think we should weigh that
> against increasing memory usage too much and thus scaring away the
> embedded folks.
I don't
Sorry, I was also missing the _long variants. While at it I added a missing
ATOMIC_LONG_FETCH_INC_DEC_OP undef.
--8<-
From: Davidlohr Bueso
Subject: [PATCH -v3 01/12] locking/atomic: Introduce inc/dec calls for FETCH-OP
flavors
With
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:45 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> > > wrote:
> > > >
:
Sorry, I was also missing the _long variants. While at it I added a missing
ATOMIC_LONG_FETCH_INC_DEC_OP undef.
--8<-
From: Davidlohr Bueso
Subject: [PATCH -v3 01/12] locking/atomic: Introduce inc/dec calls for FETCH-OP
flavors
With the inclusion of
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:45 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> > > wrote:
> > > >
:
> > > > I think GENHD_FL_DAX is more
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:47:23 schrieb John Stultz:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Mueller
> wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:47:23 schrieb John Stultz:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Mueller
> wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
>> >
>> > Hi John,
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Jun
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> If CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is selected, kernel stacks are allocated with
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> If CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is selected, kernel stacks are allocated with
>>> vmalloc_node.
>> [...]
>>> static struct
For callers of pci_common_init_dev(), we previously always required a PCI
I/O port resource. If the caller's ->setup() function had added an I/O
resource, we used that; otherwise, we added a default 64K I/O port space
for it.
There are PCI host bridges that do not support I/O port space, and we
For callers of pci_common_init_dev(), we previously always required a PCI
I/O port resource. If the caller's ->setup() function had added an I/O
resource, we used that; otherwise, we added a default 64K I/O port space
for it.
There are PCI host bridges that do not support I/O port space, and we
Hello,
Just a couple nits.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:56:38AM -0700, Kenny Yu wrote:
> Summary:
No need for "Summary:" tag.
> This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
> rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
> pids in
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:19:38PM +, Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri wrote:
> > > > > > > mode Earlier In the driver this configuration is read from the
> > > > > > > device-tree But as per lars and your suggestion moved it as
> > > > > > > runtime
> > config
> > > > parameters.
> > > > > >
> > >
Hello,
Just a couple nits.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:56:38AM -0700, Kenny Yu wrote:
> Summary:
No need for "Summary:" tag.
> This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
> rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
> pids in
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:19:38PM +, Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri wrote:
> > > > > > > mode Earlier In the driver this configuration is read from the
> > > > > > > device-tree But as per lars and your suggestion moved it as
> > > > > > > runtime
> > config
> > > > parameters.
> > > > > >
> > >
Previously we added a dummy I/O port region even though the R-Car
controller doesn't support PCI port I/O. This resulted in bogus root bus
resources like this:
pci_bus :00: root bus resource [io 0xee08-0xee0810ff]
pci_bus :00: root bus resource [mem 0xee08-0xee0810ff]
Drop
Previously we added a dummy I/O port region even though the R-Car
controller doesn't support PCI port I/O. This resulted in bogus root bus
resources like this:
pci_bus :00: root bus resource [io 0xee08-0xee0810ff]
pci_bus :00: root bus resource [mem 0xee08-0xee0810ff]
Drop
Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
This is the device tree for a new board (well, from 2006).
I don't expect to send you much more this cycle unless we get an
agreement on the TCB driver rework.
The following changes since commit 64c0703e269d442f0406b34e64e23744151ea276:
ARM: dts: at91: calao: remove
Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
This is the device tree for a new board (well, from 2006).
I don't expect to send you much more this cycle unless we get an
agreement on the TCB driver rework.
The following changes since commit 64c0703e269d442f0406b34e64e23744151ea276:
ARM: dts: at91: calao: remove
cgroup core expected css_alloc to return an ERR_PTR value on failure
and caused NULL deref if it returned NULL. It's an easy mistake to
make from an alloc function and there's no ambiguity in what's being
indicated. Update css_create() so that it interprets NULL return from
css_alloc as -ENOMEM.
cgroup core expected css_alloc to return an ERR_PTR value on failure
and caused NULL deref if it returned NULL. It's an easy mistake to
make from an alloc function and there's no ambiguity in what's being
indicated. Update css_create() so that it interprets NULL return from
css_alloc as -ENOMEM.
On 20 June 2016 at 08:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> etm4_trace_id is not guaranteed to be executed on the CPU whose ETM is
> being accessed. This leads to exception similar to below one if the
> CPU whose ETM is being accessed is in deeper idle states. So it must
> be executed
On 20 June 2016 at 08:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> etm4_trace_id is not guaranteed to be executed on the CPU whose ETM is
> being accessed. This leads to exception similar to below one if the
> CPU whose ETM is being accessed is in deeper idle states. So it must
> be executed on the CPU whose ETM is
Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
Here are more compilation warning fixes and the final documentation for the
sama5d2 that we forgot about.
The following changes since commit 8b2f2d0356184cc7c409b2f046c550ce00ca8f70:
ARM: at91: debug: add default DEBUG_LL addresses (2016-06-10 17:09:28 +0200)
are available
Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
Here are more compilation warning fixes and the final documentation for the
sama5d2 that we forgot about.
The following changes since commit 8b2f2d0356184cc7c409b2f046c550ce00ca8f70:
ARM: at91: debug: add default DEBUG_LL addresses (2016-06-10 17:09:28 +0200)
are available
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:26:19AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 6/21/2016 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>I'm not sure who builds the toolchains, but tilepro is in upstream
> >>>gcc/binutils/etc
> >>>so should be easy
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:26:19AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 6/21/2016 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>I'm not sure who builds the toolchains, but tilepro is in upstream
> >>>gcc/binutils/etc
> >>>so should be easy
The following scenario is possible:
CPU 1 CPU 2
static_key_slow_inc
atomic_inc_not_zero
-> key.enabled == 0, no increment
jump_label_lock
atomic_inc_return
-> key.enabled == 1 now
Em Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:12:38PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> On 2016/6/21 0:22, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:38:18AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:29:13AM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> > > > On 2016/6/17 0:48, Arnaldo
Em Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:12:38PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> On 2016/6/21 0:22, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:38:18AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:29:13AM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> > > > On 2016/6/17 0:48, Arnaldo
The following scenario is possible:
CPU 1 CPU 2
static_key_slow_inc
atomic_inc_not_zero
-> key.enabled == 0, no increment
jump_label_lock
atomic_inc_return
-> key.enabled == 1 now
Hisashi Kanda wrote:
> In fact, BUG() in do_sparc64_fault occurred in modified version
> of linux-2.6.25.8 on SPARC64VIIIfx. I'm misunderstanding that
> the same problem remains in the latest.
Fujitsu K computer, with SPARC64 VIIIfx, runs a heavily modified
2.6.25.8 kernel. And maybe also
Hisashi Kanda wrote:
> In fact, BUG() in do_sparc64_fault occurred in modified version
> of linux-2.6.25.8 on SPARC64VIIIfx. I'm misunderstanding that
> the same problem remains in the latest.
Fujitsu K computer, with SPARC64 VIIIfx, runs a heavily modified
2.6.25.8 kernel. And maybe also
Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
Here are two simple fixes for our memory drivers.
The following changes since commit 1fdab21d1d52a85c31f932844242fec5fb81daac:
memory: atmel-ebi: add DT bindings documentation (2016-06-02 08:32:25 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
This is a revised version of the patchset:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-June/098787.html
This patchset is intended to fix the issue of not having HPD when we're in
runtime suspend, or on Valleyview/Cherryview systems when we don't have any
power wells enabled. While this
This lets call intel_crt_reset() in contexts where IRQs are disabled and
as such, can't hold the locks required to work with the connectors.
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ville Syrjälä
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter
Signed-off-by: Lyude
On 6/21/2016 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I'm not sure who builds the toolchains, but tilepro is in upstream
gcc/binutils/etc
so should be easy enough to include. There's also a cross-toolchain for x64 I
put
up a while ago
While VGA hotplugging worked(ish) before, it looks like that was mainly
because we'd unintentionally enable it in
valleyview_crt_detect_hotplug() when we did a force trigger. This
doesn't work reliably enough because whenever the display powerwell on
vlv gets disabled, the values set in VLV_ADPA
Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
Here are two simple fixes for our memory drivers.
The following changes since commit 1fdab21d1d52a85c31f932844242fec5fb81daac:
memory: atmel-ebi: add DT bindings documentation (2016-06-02 08:32:25 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
This is a revised version of the patchset:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-June/098787.html
This patchset is intended to fix the issue of not having HPD when we're in
runtime suspend, or on Valleyview/Cherryview systems when we don't have any
power wells enabled. While this
This lets call intel_crt_reset() in contexts where IRQs are disabled and
as such, can't hold the locks required to work with the connectors.
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ville Syrjälä
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter
Signed-off-by: Lyude
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c | 10 +-
1 file
On 6/21/2016 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I'm not sure who builds the toolchains, but tilepro is in upstream
gcc/binutils/etc
so should be easy enough to include. There's also a cross-toolchain for x64 I
put
up a while ago
While VGA hotplugging worked(ish) before, it looks like that was mainly
because we'd unintentionally enable it in
valleyview_crt_detect_hotplug() when we did a force trigger. This
doesn't work reliably enough because whenever the display powerwell on
vlv gets disabled, the values set in VLV_ADPA
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 20-06-16 09:13:55, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > On Fri 17-06-16 13:00:42, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >> If CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is selected,
On Tue 21-06-16 00:22:49, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
> As for changing the default - remember that we currently warn about
> allocation failures as if they were bugs, unless they are explicitely
> allocated with the __GFP_NOWARN flag. We can assume that the current
> __GFP_NOWARN sites are 1)
Unfortunately, there's two situations where we lose hpd right now:
- Runtime suspend
- When we've shut off all of the power wells on Valleyview/Cherryview
While it would be nice if this didn't cause issues, this has the
ability to get us in some awkward states where a user won't be able to
get
On June 21, 2016 2:06:20 AM PDT, David Howells wrote:
>H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> Well, that sounds promising. I wonder how David's model, using
>> intrinsics (do we have enough intrinsics to actually be able to do
>this
>> "correctly"?), compare to using
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 20-06-16 09:13:55, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > On Fri 17-06-16 13:00:42, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> >> If CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is selected, kernel stacks are allocated with
>> >>
On Tue 21-06-16 00:22:49, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
> As for changing the default - remember that we currently warn about
> allocation failures as if they were bugs, unless they are explicitely
> allocated with the __GFP_NOWARN flag. We can assume that the current
> __GFP_NOWARN sites are 1)
Unfortunately, there's two situations where we lose hpd right now:
- Runtime suspend
- When we've shut off all of the power wells on Valleyview/Cherryview
While it would be nice if this didn't cause issues, this has the
ability to get us in some awkward states where a user won't be able to
get
On June 21, 2016 2:06:20 AM PDT, David Howells wrote:
>H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> Well, that sounds promising. I wonder how David's model, using
>> intrinsics (do we have enough intrinsics to actually be able to do
>this
>> "correctly"?), compare to using the flags output from assembly.
>
Currently we always require an I/O port resource for PCI host bridges. Even
if the bridge doesn't actually support I/O port space, we add a default I/O
resource for it.
These patches make I/O port space optional on ARM. Comments welcome.
If these look OK, I'll fold them into the series at [1],
Currently we always require an I/O port resource for PCI host bridges. Even
if the bridge doesn't actually support I/O port space, we add a default I/O
resource for it.
These patches make I/O port space optional on ARM. Comments welcome.
If these look OK, I'll fold them into the series at [1],
One of the things preventing us from using polling is the fact that
calling valleyview_crt_detect_hotplug() when there's a VGA cable
connected results in sending another hotplug. With polling enabled when
HPD is disabled, this results in a scenario like this:
- We enable power wells and reset the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> If CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is selected, kernel stacks are allocated with
>> vmalloc_node.
> [...]
>> static struct thread_info
One of the things preventing us from using polling is the fact that
calling valleyview_crt_detect_hotplug() when there's a VGA cable
connected results in sending another hotplug. With polling enabled when
HPD is disabled, this results in a scenario like this:
- We enable power wells and reset the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> If CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is selected, kernel stacks are allocated with
>> vmalloc_node.
> [...]
>> static struct thread_info *alloc_thread_info_node(struct task_struct *tsk,
>>
Summary:
This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
pids in the cgroup is reached, the controller will log this and also notify the
newly added cgroups events file. The `max` key in the
Summary:
This patch adds more visibility into the pids controller when the controller
rejects a fork request. Whenever fork fails because the limit on the number of
pids in the cgroup is reached, the controller will log this and also notify the
newly added cgroups events file. The `max` key in the
mem_cgroup_css_alloc() was returning NULL on failure while cgroup core
expected it to return an ERR_PTR value leading to the following NULL
deref after a css allocation failure. Fix it by return
ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) instead. I'll also update cgroup core so that it
can handle NULL returns.
mkdir:
mem_cgroup_css_alloc() was returning NULL on failure while cgroup core
expected it to return an ERR_PTR value leading to the following NULL
deref after a css allocation failure. Fix it by return
ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) instead. I'll also update cgroup core so that it
can handle NULL returns.
mkdir:
Hi Ming/Chandrasekhar,
Chandra Sekhar Lingutla codeaurora.org> writes:
>
> Hi Ming,
>
> [...]
> > +static inline bool live_in_glue_dir(struct kobject *kobj,
> > + struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + if (!kobj || !dev->class ||
> > + kobj->kset !=
Hi Ming/Chandrasekhar,
Chandra Sekhar Lingutla codeaurora.org> writes:
>
> Hi Ming,
>
> [...]
> > +static inline bool live_in_glue_dir(struct kobject *kobj,
> > + struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + if (!kobj || !dev->class ||
> > + kobj->kset !=
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> > > Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
> > > Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:47:23 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Mueller
wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:47:23 schrieb John Stultz:
Hi John,
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Mueller
wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 09:22:31 schrieb John Stultz:
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday, June
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:41:00PM +0300, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:26:23AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Valentine]
> >
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> > Hi Geert,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for testing this, and sorry for the breakage.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:41:00PM +0300, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:26:23AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Valentine]
> >
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> > Hi Geert,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for testing this, and sorry for the breakage.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -1993,6 +1993,23 @@ config PHYSICAL_ALIGN
>>
>> Don't change this unless you know what you are doing.
>>
>>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -1993,6 +1993,23 @@ config PHYSICAL_ALIGN
>>
>> Don't change this unless you know what you are doing.
>>
>> +config RANDOMIZE_MEMORY
>> + bool
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 01:02:59PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Peter Chen writes:
> >> >> So far, I haven't seen anybody talking about real USB OTG (the spec)
> >> >> when they say OTG. Usually they just mean "a method for swapping between
> >> >> host and
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 01:02:59PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Peter Chen writes:
> >> >> So far, I haven't seen anybody talking about real USB OTG (the spec)
> >> >> when they say OTG. Usually they just mean "a method for swapping between
> >> >> host and peripheral roles, but we
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:25 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Kani, Toshimitsu
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 09:41 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jun 20 2016 at 6:22pm -0400,
>>
The proc_tty_init() is defined in proc_tty.c, but has no declaration
as the file does not include internal.h where the declaration is.
Fix the following sparse error by including internal.h:
linux/fs/proc/proc_tty.c:175:13: warning: symbol 'proc_tty_init' was not
declared. Should it be static?
The proc_tty_init() is defined in proc_tty.c, but has no declaration
as the file does not include internal.h where the declaration is.
Fix the following sparse error by including internal.h:
linux/fs/proc/proc_tty.c:175:13: warning: symbol 'proc_tty_init' was not
declared. Should it be static?
901 - 1000 of 2328 matches
Mail list logo