Re: [PATCH] kasan: avoid overflowing quarantine size on low memory systems

On 08/02/2016 01:07 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Andrey Ryabinin >>> >>> Why WARN? I'd suggest pr_warn_once(); >> >> >> I would suggest to just do something useful. Setting

Re: [PATCH] musb: omap2430: do not assume balanced enable()/disable()

* Andreas Kemnade [160729 11:14]: > The code assumes that omap2430_musb_enable() and > omap2430_musb_disable() is called in a balanced way. The > That fact is broken by the fact that musb_init_controller() calls > musb_platform_disable() to switch from unknown state to off

[PATCH 0025/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0028/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0031/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0245/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0072/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0237/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0195/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0234/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0241/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0239/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0167/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0173/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0163/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0236/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0193/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0247/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0235/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0168/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0218/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0243/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0232/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0095/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0315/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0339/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0328/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0329/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0129/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0291/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0337/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0345/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0149/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCHv2 1/7] tools lib: Add bitmap_alloc function

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:33:59AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:45:18PM -0600, David Ahern wrote: > > On 8/1/16 12:02 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > @@ -65,4 +66,13 @@ static inline int test_and_set_bit(int nr, unsigned > > > long *addr) > > > return (old & mask) != 0; > > >

[PATCH 0352/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1164/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0997/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1156/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1160/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1153/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1173/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1142/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1169/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1152/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1167/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

Re: [PATCH 6/6] kasan: improve double-free reports.

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > > > On 08/02/2016 02:39 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > >>> +static void kasan_end_report(unsigned long *flags) >>> +{ >>> + >>>

[PATCH 0999/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1170/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1171/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1168/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1141/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1026/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1099/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1145/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1144/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1045/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

Re: [PATCH 0955/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

Baole Ni writes: > I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value > when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. > As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the > corresponding macro, > and that using

[PATCH 1138/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1113/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1037/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 1134/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

Re: [PATCH] phy: exynos-mipi-video: simplify check for coupled phy status

On 08/02/2016 10:52 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > There is no need to access regmap of coupled phy to check its state - such > information is already in the phy device itself, so use it directly. This > let us to avoid possible access to registers of the device in the disabled > power domain if

Re: Hang in 9p/virtio

On Sat, 30 Jul 2016 23:42:18 +0200 Vegard Nossum wrote: > Hi, > > With fault injection triggering an allocation failure for the > alloc_indirect() call in virtqueue_add() I'm seeing a hang in > p9_virtio_zc_request() -- it seems to be waiting here indefinitely > (i.e.

[PATCH] irqdomain: fix irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell()

Use IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK on irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell() According to the xlate() callback definition, the 'out_type' parameter needs to be the "linux irq type". A mask for such bits exists, IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK, and as a matter of fact it is used in irq_domain_xlate_twocell(), use it for

[PATCH 0/1] USB: serial: option: add support for Telit LE920A4

This patch adds a set of compositions for Telit LE920A4. Compositions in short are: 0x1207: tty + tty 0x1208: tty + adb + tty + tty 0x1211: tty + adb + ecm 0x1212: tty + adb 0x1213: ecm + tty 0x1214: tty + adb + ecm + tty telit_le922_blacklist_usbcfg3 is reused for compositions 0x1211 and

Re: [PATCH] phy: exynos-mipi-video: simplify check for coupled phy status

Hi Marek, [auto build test ERROR on phy/next] [also build test ERROR on v4.7 next-20160802] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Marek-Szyprowski/phy-exynos-mipi-video-simplify-check

Re: [RFC 0/4] tools lib traceevent: Install fixes

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:10:55PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 07:41:28PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > hi, > > sending traceevent changes to make this lib installable > > under rpm spec. > > > > Basically adding support to: > > - install header files > > - install

Re: [PATCH 1/4] tools lib traceevent: Add install_headers target

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:19:08AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 07:41:29PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > Adding install_headers target to install all headers > > under 'include/traceevent' path, like: > > > > $ make DESTDIR=/tmp/krava prefix=/usr

Re: [PATCH v2] irqdomain: factorise irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell()

Hi Thomas, On 08/02/2016 10:31 AM, Sebastian Frias wrote: >> So the proper way to do that is to split this into two patches: >> >> #1 Change the existing code to do the masking and explain why it is correct. >> >> #2 Refactor the code and get rid of the duplicated implementation. > > Ok, I can

[tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: Change log level for duration warning to KERN_INFO

Commit-ID: 0d87d7ec22a0879d3926faa4f4f4412a5dee1fba Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0d87d7ec22a0879d3926faa4f4f4412a5dee1fba Author: David Ahern AuthorDate: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:49:29 -0700 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitDate: Tue, 2 Aug 2016

Re: [RFC] usb: host: u132-hcd: Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue

On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 10:18 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 02-08-16 10:06:12, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 10:20 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > If any real IO depends on those devices then this is not sufficient and > > > > they need some form of guarantee

[PATCH] net: xgene: fix maybe-uninitialized variable

Building with -Wmaybe-uninitialized shows a potential use of an uninitialized variable: drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_hw.c: In function 'xgene_enet_phy_connect': drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_hw.c:802:23: warning: 'phy_dev' may be used uninitialized in this function

Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Mitigate performance regression in times()/clock_gettime()

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 04:07:14PM +0200, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote: > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith > Signed-off-by: Giovanni Gherdovich SoB chain is borken. Either Mike wrote the patch in which case you're missing a From: Mike header someplace, or you

[PATCH 0008/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0005/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0024/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0015/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0001/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0020/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0006/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0014/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0007/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0119/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0100/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0116/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0077/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0076/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0073/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0103/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0078/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0118/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0134/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0120/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0117/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0321/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0442/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0474/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

Re: [RFC] usb: host: u132-hcd: Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue

On Tue 02-08-16 12:03:23, Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 10:18 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 02-08-16 10:06:12, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 10:20 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > If any real IO depends on those devices then this is

[PATCH 0475/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

[PATCH 0467/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >