On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:19:41PM -0400, Ignacio Monge wrote:
> I have VIA686a too and a UDMA100 hard disk.
> This is my cat /proc/ide/via:
>
> --VIA BusMastering IDE Configuration
> Driver Version: 3.23
> South Bridge:
Greetings All,
After upgrading from kernel 2.0.38 w/ slackware-3.4 to
kernel 2.2.16 w/ slackware-7.1 I have developed the following
routing problems.
Hardware -
eth0 - 10meg on net 192.168.0.0 i/f 192.168.0.1 subnet
255.255.255.128
eth1 - 100meg on net 192.168.0.128 i/f
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Basically, I don't want to mix synchronous and asynchronous
> interfaces. Everything should be asynchronous by default, and waiting
> should be explicit.
The following patch changes all swap IO functions to be asynchronous by
default and changes
Well it would appear the tulip driver regressed from 2.4.2-ac22 and
2.4.3. (2.4.3-ac12 isn't working either) Once again, my tulip card just
spews carrier errors and doesn't even get a link light.
If someone could point me to a patch I would appreciate it. I have
attached any pretient information
Roger Gammans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:14:41AM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
> > People who want to take over "because it is s00 k3w1 to be a maintainer"
> > with no real interest in the code, just in the fact that it is orphaned...
>
> No. People who want to give
george anzinger wrote:
>
> This is an attempt to look in the wheel locker.
>
> I need a simple event sub system for use in the kernel. I envision at
> least two types of events: the history event and the timing event.
>
> The timing event would keep track of start/stop times by class. If,
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Nigel Gamble wrote:
> A SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR task with priority n+1 will not preempt a
> running task with priority n. You need to give the higher priority task
> a priority of at least n+2 for it to be chosen by the scheduler.
>
> The problem is caused by
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Aaron Lehmann did have cause to say:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:07:48AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > What real value does it have, apart from the geek "look at me, I'm using
> > bash" value?
>
> I don't really want to get into it at the moment, but imagine hacking
>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
>
> Ok, now to the second chapter. These are all the changes
> accumulated since the patch I sent one month ago (cf previous e-mail).
> Changes :
> o more Prism2/Symbol compatibility goodies
>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:56:37PM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:15:08PM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > Downloaded the patch again (patch-2.4.4-pre6), checked that it
> > was complete, my patch is in. Oups ! Do I feel stupid...
>
> Let's
1. If I install CML2 and go directly to "make xconfig", it deduces it needs
to set top level options because some of the low level options are set. For
example SCSI enabled because some SCSI device is set or hot plug because
PCMCIA is set...because some PCMCIA device is set. The _problem_
>
> Also, I initially built ac13 with:
>
> make mrproper
> make menuconfig
>
> and it doesn't ask whether I want to build the normal USHI USB driver either as
> a module or builtin to the kernel, only whether I want to build the alternative
> USHI USB dirver (the JE driver). Make
> mt : mt-st v. 0.4
Also mt-st < v0.5b were fairly broken especially with positioning.
rgds,
tim.
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I've been running masquerading unchanged from 2.2.13, currently 2.2.19 as:
real IP +
masq. 192.168.1.NNN
DSL <-> gateway <-> switch <-> client 1
server <-> client 2
...
<-> client n
There
I've been having continual unexplained lockup problems since converting one
of my outgoing qmail servers to 2.4.x. This has been discussed before on
this list, where the symptoms are that anything typed on console takes
forever to actually come up, and after a few minutes the machine is so
This is an attempt to look in the wheel locker.
I need a simple event sub system for use in the kernel. I envision at
least two types of events: the history event and the timing event.
The timing event would keep track of start/stop times by class. If, for
example, I wanted to know how much
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
> OK. "time make bzImage". Of course, mine's really slow (and I will consider
> myself publically humiliated if my only Linux machine is beaten on a kernel
> compile by an iPAQ). I 'spose, if it only goes into suspend, the ability to
> write "uptime" on
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Quit being a naysayer. UNIX on a PDA is a wet dream.
>> What real value does it have, apart from the geek "look at me, I'm using
>> bash" value?
>
>It means I can do anything on my ipaq I can do anywhere else. I can run
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 05:35:10PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:32:46AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > True, but then imagine trying to hack C (no, that's a CURLY BRACE, and a
> > tab! not space! you just broke my makefiles! aargh!), and compiling
> > Netfilter (it
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:16:03AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Quit being a naysayer. UNIX on a PDA is a wet dream.
> > What real value does it have, apart from the geek "look at me, I'm using
> > bash" value?
>
> It means I can do anything on my ipaq I can do anywhere else. I can run
>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:32:46AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> True, but then imagine trying to hack C (no, that's a CURLY BRACE, and a
> tab! not space! you just broke my makefiles! aargh!), and compiling
> Netfilter (it takes HOW MANY hours to compile init/main.c?!?) on a PDA.
> Hrmz.
I
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 05:20:27PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:07:48AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > What real value does it have, apart from the geek "look at me, I'm using
> > bash" value?
>
> I don't really want to get into it at the moment, but imagine hacking
>
At 5:01 PM -0700 2001-04-24, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:38:01PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> And UNIX on a phone is pure overkill.
>
>Quit being a naysayer. UNIX on a PDA is a wet dream.
http://www.agendacomputing.com/ (not that the reviews have been very kind)
--
Sorry if my mail has been bouncing. I've been experimenting with some
configurations and I am moving tomorrow so my domain/IP will be changing.
Whoever, deleted me from list, thanks. Please don't block sh0n.net though
from posting.
I'll read myself when my new IP is added to my domain.
Thank
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:07:48AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> What real value does it have, apart from the geek "look at me, I'm using
> bash" value?
I don't really want to get into it at the moment, but imagine hacking
netfilter without lugging a laptop around. PDA's are sleek and cool,
and
> > Quit being a naysayer. UNIX on a PDA is a wet dream.
> What real value does it have, apart from the geek "look at me, I'm using
> bash" value?
It means I can do anything on my ipaq I can do anywhere else. I can run
multiple apps at a time. I can run X11. I can run the palm emulator even ;)
Linus,
Can you please apply the following patch ?
It avoids allocators from waking up bdflush all the time even when it does
not have any job to do (ie no more than 30% (default) of dirty buffers).
Thanks
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Colonel wrote:
> From: Colonel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
The Release Notes say "Fix problems with realaudio masquerading". Looked
promising, since with 2.2.17 one masqueraded system (but not another) was
having occassional problems with realaudio at some (but not all) sites.
Compiled 2.2.19 with 'make oldconfig,' no to new options. Otherwise running
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 05:01:18PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:38:01PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > And UNIX on a phone is pure overkill.
>
> Quit being a naysayer. UNIX on a PDA is a wet dream.
What real value does it have, apart from the geek "look at me, I'm
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:38:01PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> And UNIX on a phone is pure overkill.
Quit being a naysayer. UNIX on a PDA is a wet dream.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:36:42PM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001, Michael Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and it doesn't ask whether I want to build the normal USHI USB driver either as
> > a module or builtin to the kernel, only whether I want to build the
Oops forgot to update the text. This one is of course not just compile fixes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001, Michael Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and it doesn't ask whether I want to build the normal USHI USB driver either as
> a module or builtin to the kernel, only whether I want to build the alternative
> USHI USB dirver (the JE driver). Make xconfig asks whether you
Ion Badulescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 23 Apr 2001 12:54:22 -0600, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'll include it again. I had it attached as a plain text attachment,
> > I don't know if that is a problem or not.
>
> Actually it was attached as text/x-patch, not as
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:14:11AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
>
> Intermediate diffs are available from
>
> http://www.bzimage.org
>
> This isnt a proper release as such, it should just deal with
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
Intermediate diffs are available from
http://www.bzimage.org
This isnt a proper release as such, it should just deal with most of the
compile failure/symbol failure problems.
2.4.3-ac14
o
Are there any negative effects of editing include/asm/param.h to change
HZ from 100 to 1024? Or any other number? This has been suggested as a
way to improve the responsiveness of the GUI on a Linux system. Does it
throw off anything else, like serial port timing, etc.?
-
To unsubscribe from
At 3:59 PM -0600 4/24/01, Richard Gooch wrote:
>The plan I have (which I hope to get started on soon, now that I'm
>back from travels), is to change /dev/scsi/host# from a directory into
>a symbolic link to a directory called: /dev/bus/pci0/slot1/function0.
>Thus, to access a partition via
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:22:15AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Also, what is a good rock solid SCSI RAID controller? Money is
> no object. Reliability, performance and Linux compatibility are
> though.
I have very good experiences with the Mylex controllers/drivers!
But then again I also
In list.kernel, axel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>How about correcting the needed gcc version in Documentation/Changes?
Linux, with up to date documention?? In your dreams perhaps.
>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>> > after having had trouble with compilation due to old gcc
> === Cut ===
> [root@nomad /root]# depmod -ae
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
> /lib/modules/2.4.3ac13/kernel/drivers/net/aironet4500_card.o
> depmod: __bad_udelay
> === Cut ===
Yeah I need to change the __bad_udelay trick. The inline in inline case that
triggers a bad_udelay link
=== Cut ===
[root@nomad /root]# depmod -ae
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.3ac13/kernel/drivers/net/aironet4500_card.o
depmod: __bad_udelay
=== Cut ===
---
Sergey Kubushin Sr. Unix Administrator
CyberBills, Inc.Phone:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:15:08PM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
>
[...]
> Downloaded the patch again (patch-2.4.4-pre6), checked that it
> was complete, my patch is in. Oups ! Do I feel stupid...
Let's finish this story. As indicated above, the first
fragment of the patch I sent
> " " == apark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, Recently upgraded to 2.2.19, along with new
> nfs-utils(0.3.1). But I have a program that requires a
> exclusive write lock on a NFSed directory. When I was using
> 2.2.17 all was ok, but now it returns ENOLCK. Does
On 23 Apr 2001 12:54:22 -0600, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll include it again. I had it attached as a plain text attachment,
> I don't know if that is a problem or not.
Actually it was attached as text/x-patch, not as text/plain... so
pine certainly refused to display it
> " " == Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> _Ouch_. So what are you going to do if another iget4() comes
> between the moment when you hash the inode and set these
> fields? You are filling them only after you drop inode_lock, so
> AFAICS the current code has
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 05:18:36PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Steven Walter wrote:
> >
> > This patch allows the serial driver to properly detect and set up the
> > ActionTec PCI modem. This modem has a PCI class of COMMUNICATION_OTHER,
> > which is why this modem is not otherwise detected.
>
While tracking down a sound problem, I decided to compile in the
soundblaster rather than use modules. It's been a long time since I
ran sound under linux, but that used to work fine.
I watched the reboot, noticed the usual isapnp stuff (part of problem)
...
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
Limiting
Xiong Zhao wrote:
> hello.on linux we will see a new domino server process/thread is created for each
> client.how does linux do this?does it use pthread?using fork or clone or someway
> else?what's the common way of linux to support apps like lotus domino that will
> have lots of concurrent
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:47:30PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > patch (without feedback), whereas Alan picked it up (if I remember
> > correctly it was included in his 'patch-2.4.2-ac28').
> > So now, what should I do with the rest of my updates and the
> > new one that have accumulated since ?
On 24 Apr 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> I believe your patch introduces a race for the NFS case. The problem
> lies in the fact that nfs_find_actor() needs to read several of the
> fields from nfs_inode_info. By adding an allocation after the inode
> has been hashed, you are
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:49:23PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > One thing to watch out for is that the current code zeros the u. struct
> > for us (as you pointed out to me previously), but allocating from the
> > slab cache will not... This could
Matt Domsch writes:
> Thanks everyone for your input again. I've made the changes suggested, and
> would appreciate this being applied to Linus' and Alan's trees. This is
> necessary for solving the "what disk does BIOS think is my boot disk"
> problem on IA-64, and I hope to extend it to IA-32
> " " == Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Jan Harkes wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:45:05PM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
>> > BTW: Is it still less than one page? Then it doesn't make me
>> >nervous. Why? Guess what granularity we
Ignacio Monge wrote:
>
> Hi.
> I have VIA686a too and a UDMA100 hard disk.
So do I.
> This is my cat /proc/ide/via:
>
> --VIA BusMastering IDE Configuration
> Driver Version: 3.23
> South Bridge: VIA
> If USB is disabled on a server works MB reboots hang in 2.2.x
In almost all cases a hang after Linux reboots the system and it not coming
back to the BIOS is a BIOS bug.
You can confirm this by asking the kernel to do a real bios reboot with
the reboot= option
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Steven Walter wrote:
>
> This patch allows the serial driver to properly detect and set up the
> ActionTec PCI modem. This modem has a PCI class of COMMUNICATION_OTHER,
> which is why this modem is not otherwise detected.
>
> Any suggestions on the patch are welcome. Thanks
A small
Thanks everyone for your input again. I've made the changes suggested, and
would appreciate this being applied to Linus' and Alan's trees. This is
necessary for solving the "what disk does BIOS think is my boot disk"
problem on IA-64, and I hope to extend it to IA-32 when BIOSs permit.
Jeff
If USB is disabled on a server works MB reboots hang in 2.2.x
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:47:38PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> While I applaud your initiative, you made an unfortunate choice of
> filesystems to convert. The iso_inode_info is only 4*__u32, as is
> proc_inode_info. Given that we still need to keep a pointer to the
> external info structs,
Alan Cox wrote:
> > I've got a dual-processor system built around the Intel SBT2 motherboard,
> > which uses the ServerWorks LE chipset. 2.4.3 SMP works fine. When I
> > build a UP kernel with IO-APIC support, I get this during boot:
>
> Turn off the OSB4 driver - bet that helps
It does --
I've just packaged up the latest Linux hotplug scripts into a release,
which can be found at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=17679
This release adds the Debian scripts to the tarball, although all of the
debian specific changes were not merged into the main
Hi,
Recently upgraded to 2.2.19, along with new nfs-utils(0.3.1).
But I have a program that requires a exclusive write lock
on a NFSed directory. When I was using 2.2.17 all was ok,
but now it returns ENOLCK. Does anybody else have the
same problem?
Thanks
-Andrew
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Hamilton, Eamonn wrote:
> Hi Folks.
>
> Under all of the kernels I have access to try ( 2.2.19, 2.4.X & 2.4.X-ac* ),
> when I try and write an image in XA2 format to my SCSI writer ( Yamaha
> CDR-400t ), I get a DMA overrun. When I try with a kernel patched with the
>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:56:32PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:10:07AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > ptrace only operates on processes that are stopped. So there are no
> > locking issues - we've synchronized on a much higher level than a
> > spinlock or
> patch (without feedback), whereas Alan picked it up (if I remember
> correctly it was included in his 'patch-2.4.2-ac28').
> So now, what should I do with the rest of my updates and the
> new one that have accumulated since ? Should I wait until you grab the
> first patch from Alan's tree
> I've got a dual-processor system built around the Intel SBT2 motherboard,
> which uses the ServerWorks LE chipset. 2.4.3 SMP works fine. When I
> build a UP kernel with IO-APIC support, I get this during boot:
Turn off the OSB4 driver - bet that helps
> 2.4.3 has this behavior, 2.4.3-ac9
Hi,
I've got a dual-processor system built around the Intel SBT2 motherboard,
which uses the ServerWorks LE chipset. 2.4.3 SMP works fine. When I
build a UP kernel with IO-APIC support, I get this during boot:
[... everything seems ok until ...]
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision:
Here is a bug report in the format requested by linux/REPORTING-BUGS.
[1] Page_alloc / Swap 2.4.3 kernel BUG with system idle
[2] The System was idle for 1h or so while I was away, and coming
back I found it frozen. It was responding to ping, but telnet
and relogin weren't working.
With the __builtin_expect patch [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted, both
2.4.4-pre6 and 2.4.3-ac12 compile with egcs-2.91.66. Also, 2.4.3-ac13 builds
without any further patches needed.
Wayne
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/23/2001 05:58:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (axel)
cc: [EMAIL
> Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The preferable one for performance is certainly to backport the 2.4 changes
>
> Is it any more substantial than changing all uses of the ptrace flags
> to the new variable?
It affects asm blocks and offsets on some ports. Its not too bad tho
-
To
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The preferable one for performance is certainly to backport the 2.4 changes
Is it any more substantial than changing all uses of the ptrace flags
to the new variable?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:19:31AM -0500, Andy Carlson wrote:
> time prime before x
> real1m23.535s
> user0m40.550s
> sys 0m42.980s
>
> /proc/mtrr before x
> reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1
> reg01: base=0xfd80 (4056MB), size= 4MB:
Al writes:
> > Well, if we get rid of NFS (50 x __u32) and HFS (44 * __u32) (sizes are
> > approximate for 32-bit arches - I was just counting by hand and not
> > strictly checking alignment), then almost all other filesystems are below
> > 25 * __u32 (i.e. half of the previous size).
>
> Yeah,
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Tomas Telensky wrote:
>
> But, what I should say to the network security, is that AFAIK in the most
> of linux distributions the standard daemons (httpd, sendmail) are run as
> root! Having multi-user system or not! Why? For only listening to a port
> <1024? Is there any
On Tuesday 24 April 2001 18:43, mirabilos wrote:
> What about indenting? I think of 0 spaces before the device name,
> 1 space before properties which belong to the device.
> Structure per entry:
>[Space] Name colon property
But what is the advantage? Its not less work in the kernel, and in
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> While I applaud your initiative, you made an unfortunate choice of
> filesystems to convert. The iso_inode_info is only 4*__u32, as is
> proc_inode_info. Given that we still need to keep a pointer to the
> external info structs, and the overhead
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> One thing to watch out for is that the current code zeros the u. struct
> for us (as you pointed out to me previously), but allocating from the
> slab cache will not... This could be an interesting source of bugs for
> some filesystems that assume
Eric Mouw writes:
> Al is right, it is no rocket science. Here is a patch against
> 2.4.4-pre6 for procfs and isofs. It took me an hour to do because I'm
> not familiar with the fs code. It compiles, and the procfs code even
> runs (sorry, no CDROM player availeble on my embedded StrongARM
>
Hi Linus,
I've got a question... I would like where to send my driver
patches...
One month ago, I sent a small update for the orinoco_cs driver
and Wireless Extensions. I didn't put all the changes I had for
orinoco_cs because I believe in small incremental updates
Al writes:
> Encapsulation part is definitely worth doing - it cleans the code up
> and doesn't change the result of compile. Adding allocation/freeing/
> cache initialization/cache removal and chaninging FOOFS_I() definition -
> well, it's probably worth to keep such patches around, but whether
> that also explain why win95 user doesn't want to use NT. not
> because they can't afford it (belive me, here NT costs only
> us$2), but additional headache isn't acceptable.
I'm going to speak from experience:
My mother, who is the biggest windoze fan on the face of the universe, got
fed up
> > child->flags |= PF_PTRACED;
> >
> > without waiting for the child to have stopped.
>
> I can see how this could case PF_USEDFPU to be cleared inadvertently,
> but I do not have any ideas for testing this. Is it clear that this
> is the source of the problem?
There is no
Hello,
I have a problem with DHCP when using tokenring card on 2.4.x
kernel . When I am using IBM tokenring adapter( all) and trying to hook on
to the lan n/w using DHCP ,I get an error message "operation failed " from
the dhcp client . The dhcp server is getting the broadcast
On Tuesday 24 April 2001 18:39, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Are there alternatives to get complex and extendable information out to
> user space?
> Yes filesystem structures.
How exactly can this work? A single value per file is not very helpful if you
have a thousand values. You could cluster
Linus Torvalds writes:
> Ahh.. This actually _does_ look like a race on "current->flags":
> PTRACE_ATTACH will do a
>
> child->flags |= PF_PTRACED;
>
> without waiting for the child to have stopped.
I can see how this could case PF_USEDFPU to be cleared inadvertently,
but I do not
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:03:44PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Chin-Tser Huang wrote:
> > Because there was a mail whose subject is "Children first in fork".
>
> Gotta watch out for source-code that uses a 'reaper' to kill children
> from SIGCHLD. We'll get auto-mail
"Christian Ehrhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Victor: Could you try to reproduce the system wide corruption if you
> add an explicit call to stts(); at the very end of __switch_to?
> This should prevent the FPU corruption from spreading.
After adding this call, I cannot reproduce the global
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Chin-Tser Huang wrote:
> Because there was a mail whose subject is "Children first in fork".
>
Gotta watch out for source-code that uses a 'reaper' to kill children
from SIGCHLD. We'll get auto-mail from pervert.snuffer.com.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Chin-Tser Huang wrote:
> Because there was a mail whose subject is "Children first in fork".
> > 1 in 6 children are victimized before the age of 16.
Considering these statistics, I'm all for running children
first after fork ...
Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi,
>
> a friend of my asked me on how to make linux easier to use
> for personal/casual win user.
>
>
> from that, i also found out that it is very awkward to type
> username and password every time i use my computer.
> so here's a patch.
Neet hack, but maybe the
Because there was a mail whose subject is "Children first in fork".
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> well... the book sounds good...
> but... I am still thinking... what it has to do with linux kernel ??
>
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/24/2001 04:27:56 PM
>
> To: [EMAIL
Hello,
I have a problem with DHCP when using tokenring card on 2.4.x
kernel . When I am using IBM tokenring adapter( all) and trying to hook on
to the lan n/w using DHCP ,I get an error message "operation failed " from
the dhcp client . The dhcp server is getting the broadcast message
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:44:17PM +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> come on, it's hard for me as it's hard for you. not everybody
> expect a computer to be like people here thinks how a computer
> should be.
I'm sorry, you're looking at the problem the wrong way around.
Its not a kernel
Hi.
I have VIA686a too and a UDMA100 hard disk.
This is my cat /proc/ide/via:
--VIA BusMastering IDE Configuration
Driver Version: 3.23
South Bridge: VIA vt82c686a
Revision: ISA
Hello,
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Now, in order for step 4 to be done safely, procmail should be running
> > as the user it's meant to deliver the mail for. for this to happen
> > sendmail needs to start it as that user in step 3 and to do that it
> > needs extra privs, above and
Hi there!
I have encountered a problem (perhaps a bug)! The attached code makes my kernel oops
in some cases when injecting new packets through Netfilter's QUEUE target. The problem
only appears when the original packet is a TCP packet; i have tried with ICMP and UDP
packets
also but this
> And get_mail must have elevated privileges to search for the users mail...
> or sendmail must have already switched user on reciept to put it in the
> users inbox which also requires privleges...
No. Think instead of blindly following existing implementation
socket(AF_UNIX,
"Thinking out of the box," you don't need to modify the kernel or the
userland utilities to make Linux automatically launch a dedicated terminal
for embedded applications. All you need to do is look at the file
/etc/inittab and read the man pages for this file. For console access, you
- Received message begins Here -
>
> > 1. email -> sendmail
> > 2. sendmail figures out what it has to do with it. turns out it's deliver
> ...
>
> > Now, in order for step 4 to be done safely, procmail should be running
> > as the user it's meant to deliver the mail for. for
1 - 100 of 495 matches
Mail list logo
