On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, SANGTAE HA wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 5:25 PM, Bruce Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > In our application (cluster computing) we use a very tightly coupled
> > high-speed low-latency network. There is no 'wide area traffic'. So it's
> > hard for me to understand why any
Hi Bruce,
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Bruce Allen wrote:
> > I see similar results on my test systems
>
> Thanks for this report and for confirming our observations. Could you
> please confirm that a single-port bidrectional UDP link runs at wire
> speed? This helps to localize the problem to the T
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > Is there a reason that the target hardware address isn't the target
> > hardware address?
>
> It is bound only to the fact that linux uses protocol address
> of the machine, which responds. It would be highly confusing
> (more than conf
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:39:26 -0500
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Make E1000E default to the same kconfig setting as E1000. So people's
> > > machiens do
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Jonas Danielsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:30:11 +0100
>
> > 2007/11/16, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > From: "Jonas Danielsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:40:13 +0100
> > >
> > > > Is there
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> (C)
> $ cat tp3.c
> int a;
>
> void func(void)
> {
> *(volatile int *)&a = 10;
> *(volatile int *)&a = 20;
> }
> $ gcc -Os -S tp3.c
> $ cat tp3.s
> ...
> movl$10, a
> movl$20, a
> ...
I'm curious about one minor tangential point. W
On Thu, 03 May 2007, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> | An advantage of changing the names is that they are now prefixed.
> >>
> >> Is the opportunity to clean up module names compelling enough, vs. (the
> >> wish for) minimized trouble with scripts which refer to module names?
>
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> There are various agencies/educational institutions doing testing but was
> curious if anyone has 'found' a 10 gigabit card shootout measuring the
> performance between 10 gigabit cards on the 2.6 kernel? Most of the
> benchmarks are from the vendors
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 13:53 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Cc'ing kvm folks as they may have a shared interest on the shared
> > physical case with the bridge (non NAT).
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Ian Campbell
> > wrote:
> > > On Mo
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Marek Belisko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
> Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko
> ---
> Based on Neil's patch and extend for documentation and bindings include.
>
> .../bindings/net/rfkill/rfkill-relugator.txt | 28
^
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 10/08/2014 20:23, Dexuan Cui a écrit :
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> >
> > IMO the most feasible and need-the-least-change solution may be:
> > the hyperv network VSC driver pas
11 matches
Mail list logo
