On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:35:53PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On 2/1/2013 11:52 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
+ ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 1, res);
of_address_to_resource() needs linux/of_address.h
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
This needs linux/err.h
More importantly, is this the
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:53:47PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
NB: among the error codes people want to propagate from
consumer interfaces such as say, clk_get(), regulator_get()
and pinctrl_get() is -EPROBE_DEFER. So just something
failed (return NULL) isn't enough.
We then obviously need
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:02:30PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:58:13AM +, Len Brown wrote:
pm_idle() on ARM was a synonym for default_idle(),
so simply invoke default_idle() directly.
The clean-up looks fine as we already have an arm_pm_idle but longer
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:32:54AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
No, I think what he is talking about it this bit:
Ok, I agree that the bitfield code actually looks cleaner.
That said, maybe gcc has an easier time
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 03:06:51PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So this looks clean, but I noticed something (that was true even of
the old 64-bit accesses)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM, tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
h...@linux.intel.com wrote:
+ register __inttype(*(ptr)) __val_gu
Zwane's arm.linux.org.uk email address has not been functional for
a number of years now. It's time that all references to it were
removed. I no longer have a forwarding address for Zwane, as I had
assumed that my repeated requests over a number of years to Zwane to
avoid use of this address had
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:42:01AM +, Philip, Avinash wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 15:52:44, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 06:06:57PM +0530, Philip Avinash wrote:
+static int elm_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct elm_info *info = dev_get_drvdata
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:36:32PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
I have hosted the series at [3].
[3] https://github.com/sumananna/mailbox/commits/dbx500-prcmu-mailbox
Suman, I suggest you ask Stepgen Rothwell to include this
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:02:49AM +0100, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
At least akpm did approve the LZO update for inclusion into 3.7, but the code
still has not been merged into the main tree.
On 2012-10-09 21:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
The changes look OK to me. Please ask
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:41:53PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:30:03PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
I guess to make the MUSB side simpler we would need musb-dma-engine
glue
to map dmaengine to the private MUSB API. Then we would have some
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 06:47:12PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:36:38PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
In my eyes, getting rid of the mess doesn't justify breaking the rules
that
Russell formulated above.
MUSB is no PCI, there is no single, standard
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:22:52AM +0100, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
index f30fb4b..8f88805 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ static u8 clk_composite_get_parent(struct
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:36:34AM +, Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish wrote:
I made following changes, in order to update dip-p pointer with
correct value:
- if (!dpi-p) {
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dpi-p)) {
dpi-p = devm_pinctrl_get(dev);
- if
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:47:38PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 04 February 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
So I think the above concerns are moot. The callback we can
set on cookies is entirely optional, and it's even implemented by
each DMA engine, and some may not even support it but
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:54:45PM -0500, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
You're assuming that cookies complete in order. That is not necessarily
true.
Under what circumstances is that not true?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 04:47:05PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:21:48PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
For IRQ mode, use the completion callback to push each cookie
to NAPI, and thus let the IRQ drive the traffic.
The whole purpose of NAPI is to avoid taking
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 04:30:45PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Cyril Chemparathy cy...@ti.com wrote:
On 02/04/2013 04:11 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
Cyril, just stack up the cookies and take a sweep over them to see
which ones are baked when the NAPI poll
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:28:11AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Added has_mailbox to the musb platform data to specify that omap uses
an external mailbox (in control module) to communicate with the musb
core during device connect and disconnect.
So, I've been through your five patches
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:22:31PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
there's a little more to it. When running allmodconfig,
CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM is set but none of the other ARCHes
(ARCH_OMAP, ARCH_AT91, ARCH_VERSATILE, etc) are set, so it turned out
that the driver wasn't even included on my
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:41:48PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:43:06PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
When using deferred driver probing, PCI host controller drivers may
actually require this function after the init stage.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com wrote:
If we want load epoch_cyc and epoch_ns atomically,
we should update epoch_cyc_copy first of all.
This notify reader that updating is in progress.
If
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:43:10PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
There are more and more applications coming to WinRT, Wine could support them,
but mostly they expect to have the thread environment block (TEB) in TPIDRURW.
This register must be preserved per thread instead of being cleared.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:13:46PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
To avoid the server latency, we didn't do continuous sync. The time was
synced in the beginning and after 62.5 hours (#ntpd -qg) and the drift
of about 174 ms was observed. As you said this could be because of
server sync
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:25:10PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
What's this with enabled unaligned memory access thing? You mean if
the arch supports CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS? If so,
that's only x86, which isn't really in the target market for this
patch, yes?
It's a lot of
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:43:20PM +0100, Egon Alter wrote:
Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2013, 10:15:49 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:25:10PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
What's this with enabled unaligned memory access thing? You mean if
the arch supports
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:30:33PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
AFAICT, arm gcc got __builtin_bswap{32,64} support in 4.6,
and for the 16-bit version in 4.8.
Hmm.
$ /usr/local/aeabi/bin/arm-linux-gcc --version
arm-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.5.4
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:34:53AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:17:33AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
Make use of devm_request_and_ioremap() and correct comment
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:54:24PM +0200, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU name: OMAP4470 ES1.0 HS
Sigh. No. Look at what you're doing - look carefully at the above.
CPU implementer - 0x41. That's A. For ARM Ltd. ARM Ltd implemented
this CPU. Did ARM Ltd really
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:21:28AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
Great hit Joe :)
Sometimes i am really surprised what code can be found
in the kernal and it is still working.
Having no clue of the code i suspect somebody tries to
check is mask outside the range it should read
PHYS_OFFSET |(
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:21:21PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:21:28AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
Great hit Joe :)
Sometimes i am really surprised what code can be found
in the kernal
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
Set up the SoC model name during OMAP ID initialisation
so it will be displayed in /proc/cpuinfo:
/ # cat proc/cpuinfo
[...]
CPU variant : 0x2
CPU part: 0xc09
CPU revision: 10
SoC name: OMAP4470
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:53:29AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 11:35 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:21:21PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
So, _either_ logical OR or addition works
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 02:07:53PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
Currently, reading /proc/cpuinfo provides userspace with CPU ID of
the CPU carrying out the read from the file.
Userspace using this information may decide what module
to load or
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:09:00PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
The savings come mostly from device-tree related code, and some
from drivers.
You forget that IP networking is all big endian, so these will be using
the byte swapping too (search it for htons/ntohs/htonl/ntohl).
v2:
- at91 and
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:59:47PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:28:01 +
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:09:00PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
v2:
- at91 and lpd270 builds fixed by limiting to ARMv6 and above
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:37:47PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
+#if GCC_VERSION = 40600
+#define __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP32__
+#define __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP64__
You really aren't listening to anything that's been said to you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:00:08AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
@@ -663,7 +661,7 @@ static inline void __zs_unmap_object(struct mapping_area
*area,
flush_cache_vunmap(addr, end);
unmap_kernel_range_noflush(addr, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
- local_flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, end);
+
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:10:37AM -0500, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
With this, I ran simple network and filesystem performance tests to
compare the code-patching vs. non-code-patching variants. These tests
didn't yield any significant performance difference between the two on
an ARMv7
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:56:00PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
hi,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:49:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
good point, do you wanna send some patches ?
I have already sent them countless times and even stuck CPPI 4.1 support
(in
arch/arm/common/cppi41.c)
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 04:07:59AM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 02-02-2013 1:30, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:49:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
good point, do you wanna send some patches ?
I have already sent them countless times and even
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:09:24AM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 02-02-2013 4:44, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:49:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
good point, do you wanna send some patches ?
I have already sent them countless times and even
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:18:51AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:09:24AM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 02-02-2013 4:44, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:49:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
good point, do you
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 01:59:59PM -0500, Matt Porter wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 07:52:46PM +, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 02/01/2013 09:49 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used
by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well.
I
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:41:08AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com [130201 10:25]:
Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used
by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well.
I think this should rather go to drivers/dma/?
Yes, it should, but just like OMAP,
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 08:27:42PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
There are two people on this thread CC list who were also involved or
CC'd on the mails from the thread in 2010... Tony and Felipe.
Unfortunately, the person who agreed to do the work is no longer in the
land of the living. Yes
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 07:01:11PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 02/25/13 03:18, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:46:18PM +, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 2/22/2013 10:27 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
What value do you have in fpsid? As far as I can tell, the
subarchitecture bits 6:0
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:58:02PM +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Nicolas == Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net writes:
Hi,
Did you actually *try* the new LZO version and the patch (which is
attached
once again) as explained in https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/3/367 ?
Because the new
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:36:47PM +0900, Kyungsik Lee wrote:
Compiler: Linaro ARM gcc 4.6.2
2. ARMv7, 1.7GHz based board
Kernel: linux 3.7
Uncompressed Kernel Size: 14MB
Compressed Size Decompression Speed
LZO 6.0MB34.1MB/sOld
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:40:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 22:10 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
So... for a selected kernel version of a particular size, can we please
have a comparison between the new LZO code and this LZ4 code, so that
we can see whether
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:30:11AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
P.S: Time and again it proves that making the local timer wakeup
capable solves the issue.
Slightly different take: it proves that hardware people don't talk to
software people about what they require to make an operating system
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:37:17PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 02/25/13 12:02, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
This can of worms is getting bigger. We have more problems with our
handling of the different VFP versions, specifically the handling of
the EX=0 DEX=0 case.
VFP common
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:49:12AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 09:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:40:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 22:10 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
So... for a selected kernel
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 09:04:48AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 16:31 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:49:12AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 09:56 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:40
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 09:39:47AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 12:16 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 16:31 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:49:12AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:01:26PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
I've recently started testing my work on arm boards and have found that
they both don't boot under the latest kernel anymore. I already posted
about my snowball board, but my panda board also locks up.
You need to enable DMA
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:25:07PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:07:57PM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Linus Walleij
linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
- If poll timer is activated, We use consistent DMA mappings to avoid
from
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:03:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, January 25, 2013 01:46:42 PM Mark Langsdorf wrote:
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
Move clk setup to twd_local_timer_common_register and rely on
twd_timer_rate being 0 to force calibration if there is
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 05:49:29PM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
Oh, ffs. This is a false positive from the compiler - there is no case
where it can actually do this as we will bail out before the walk if the
list is empty so we'll always take at least one trip through our
list_for_each_entry()
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:43:59PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I will get to those once this series is sorted out.
Since there are no interdepencies between the patches,
my preference is to have them applied by the individual
subsystem maintainers. Anything that has not at
least made it into
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 06:03:28PM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 09:59:16AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Why not code the function in a way that avoids the problem altogether?
That'd do the trick too; feel free to submit a patch...
Sorry, got other things
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:45:25PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2013, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:a...@arndb.de]
Marking it as __maybe_unused avoids a harmless gcc warning.
Alternatively, just declare it using
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:18:55AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Hi Russell,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:04:46 +0100
Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
Since Russell had comments on it earlier, I'd like him to give a nod
that he's happy with it too.
Is this ok for you?
The original
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:36:07AM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Hello,
Le 28/01/2013 09:45, Peter Ujfalusi a écrit :
hi Thierry,
On 01/26/2013 06:40 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
+{
+ return pwm-chip-can_sleep;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_cansleep);
Would it make sense to check for NULL
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:17:48AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Gregory CLEMENT
gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com wrote:
From: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
Using the devm_* managed resources the pca driver can be simplified
and cut down on
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:17:33AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
Make use of devm_request_and_ioremap() and correct comment.
Didn't a big patch come through recently converting all usages of
devm_request_and_ioremap() to another function (I forget the
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:37:25PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:08:59PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:24:15PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
Hello all
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:31:59AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
+bool dma_is_possible(size_t len)
+int map_dma_buffers(struct driver_data *drv_data)
+irqreturn_t dma_transfer(struct driver_data *drv_data)
+int dma_prepare(struct driver_data *drv_data, u32 dma_burst)
+void dma_start(struct
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:08:55AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
Convert all uses of devm_request_and_ioremap() to the newly introduced
devm_ioremap_resource() which provides more consistent error handling.
Does this include the resource part of the handling too?
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:04:46PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
Every channel has a functional clock that is similarly named.
It makes sense to use a for loop to manage these clocks as OMAPs
can come with up to 3 channels.
Dynamically allocate and get channel clocks depending on the
number
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 05:05:47PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:58:46PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:08:55AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
Convert all uses of devm_request_and_ioremap() to the newly introduced
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:20:38AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
See previous mail to Minchan; local_tlb_flush_kernel_range calls
cpu_tlb.flush_kernel_range on SMP, but a direct function call
(glue(_TLB, flush_kernel_range) which resolves to
v7wbi_flush_kernel_range etc. etc.) without CONFIG_SMP.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:41:17PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 21 January 2013, Matt Sealey wrote:
ARM seems to be the only major platform not using the
kernel/Kconfig.hz definitions, instead rolling it's own and setting
what could be described as both reasonable and
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:00:15PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
So if you can not get actual timer ticks any faster then 200 HZ on that
hardware, setting HZ higher could cause some jiffies related timer
trouble
Err, no John. It's the other way around - especially on some platforms
which are
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:18:20PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
So we used to have the ACTHZ code to handle error from the HZ rate
requested and the HZ rate possible given the underlying hardware. That's
been moved to the register_refined_jiffies(), but do you have a sense if
there a reason
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:30:07PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 21 January 2013, Matt Sealey wrote:
So is that a bug in that it is not available to ARM right now, a bug
in that it would be impossible for anyone on ARM to have ever tested
this code, or a bug in that it should NEVER
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:20:14PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
I am sorry it sounded if I was being high and mighty about not being
able to select my own HZ (or being forced by Exynos to be 200 or by
not being able to test an Exynos board, forced to default to 100). My
real grievance here is we
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:36:13PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
Well, Russell brought up a case that doesn't handle this. If a system
*can't* do HZ=100, but can do HZ=200.
Though there are hacks, of course, that might get around this (skip
every other interrupt at 200HZ).
Note: in the early
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:54:31PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
Hmm, I think it might be appreciated for people looking at this stuff
(same as I stumbled into it) for a little comment on WHY the default
is 200. That way you don't wonder even if you know why EBSA110 has a
HZ=200 default, why
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 05:23:33PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:20:14PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
I am sorry it sounded if I was being high and mighty about not being
able
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 05:30:31PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
But it would effectively stop users drinking kool-aid.. if you set
your HZ to something stupid, you don't even get a kernel to build, and
certainly don't get to boot past the first 40 lines of boot messages..
I think most people
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 07:06:59PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:51 PM, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 01/21/2013 02:54 PM, Matt Sealey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 01/21/2013 01:14 PM, Matt
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Sorry for not being clear enough. On OMAP, 32KHz is the only clock which
is always running(even during low power states) and hence the clock
source and clock event have been clocked using 32KHz clock. As mentioned
by RMK, with
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:00:56AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
I think I read somewhere at some point that ioread{8,16,32} is preferred
over write{b,h,l} in new code.
But... there's *no* point using ioread*() if you don't only use the
ioremap() interface.
ioread*() is there to allow PC IO
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:49:16AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 01/23/2013 11:27 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:00:56AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
I think I read somewhere at some point that ioread{8,16,32} is preferred
over write{b,h,l} in new
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:18:22AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
err = ioremap_page_range(virt, virt + SZ_64K - 1, phys,
Why -1 here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:43:35PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
+ spin_lock_irqsave(tll-lock, flags);
+
+ for (i = 0; i tll-nch; i++) {
+ char clkname[] = usb_tll_hs_usb_chx_clk;
+ struct clk *fck;
+
+ snprintf(clkname, sizeof(clkname),
+
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:32:35AM +, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 12:07 +0530, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
Now consider this call stack from MMC block driver (this is on the ARmv7
based board):
[ 98.918174] [c001b50c] (v7_dma_inv_range+0x30/0x48) from
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:11:20AM +, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 15:18 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:32:35AM +, James Bottomley wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 6b2fb87..ab88c5b 100644
---
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:37:42AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:11:20AM +, James Bottomley wrote:
I'd actually prefer page = pfn_to_page(page_to_pfn(page) + 1); because
it makes the code look like the hack it is. The preferred form for all
iterators
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:01:47AM +, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 10:47 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Also, couldn't the addition of the scatterlist offset to the page also
be buggy too?
No, fortunately, offset must be within the first page from the point
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:19:21AM +, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 11:04 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:01:47AM +, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 10:47 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Also, couldn't
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:40:19AM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
static void __init pcibios_init_hw(struct hw_pci *hw, struct list_head *head)
{
struct pci_sys_data *sys = NULL;
+ static int busnr;
int ret;
- int nr, busnr;
-
- for (nr = busnr = 0; nr
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:17:08PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
+ tll-ch_clk = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct clk * [tll-nch]),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tll-ch_clk) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ dev_err(dev, Couldn't allocate
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:17:09PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
+/* only PHY and UNUSED modes don't need TLL */
+#define omap_usb_mode_needs_tll(x) ((x != OMAP_USBHS_PORT_MODE_UNUSED) \
+ (x != OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_PHY))
Growl.
These parens do not make
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 04:08:48PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
- Abstain from using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() in the driver core,
Russell recently sent a patch to remove it. Handle the
NULL case explicitly even though it's a bogus case.
H... I assume you're talking about this:
+ p =
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:24:15PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
Hello all,
I wonder if anyone can shed some light on this linking problem I have
right now. If I configure my kernel without SMP support (it is a very
lean config for i.MX51 with device tree support only) I hit this error
on
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 09:56:36AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I would put it this way: With the introduction of deferred probing, the
rules for the use of __init sections have changed slightly for some
corner cases. While normal device drivers can, as before, not call
__init functions from
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 02:40:09PM +0100, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
On 02/13/2013 10:32 PM, Mircea Gherzan wrote:
[...]
Acked-by: Mircea Gherzan mgher...@gmail.com
Hi,
Thanks Mircea. Russel, David, do you have any preference as to which path
this patch should take (net tree or ARM tree) ?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:47:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Patch c08e20d24 arm: Add v7_invalidate_l1 to cache-v7.S
moves the v7_invalidate_l1 symbol out of imx/headsmp.S,
which seems to cause a link error because it is now
too far away from v7_cpu_resume when building an
allyesconfig
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:05:14AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
$ size obj-tmp/vmlinux -A
obj-tmp/vmlinux :
section size addr
.head.text504 3221258240
.text32707336 3221258752
.text.head 8 3253966088
201 - 300 of 8578 matches
Mail list logo
