Re: [PATCH 0/7] Use mboxes instead of syscon for APCS (arm32 & arm64)

2024-04-24 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote: > The first patch is for removing a bogus error warning I've noticed while > developing this on msm8226 - there the patches are also coming later for > this SoC since apcs is getting hooked up to cpufreq there also. > > Apart from usages

Re: [PATCH 0/7] Use mboxes instead of syscon for APCS (arm32 & arm64)

2024-04-24 Thread Luca Weiss
On Mittwoch, 24. April 2024 18:23:53 MESZ Luca Weiss wrote: > The first patch is for removing a bogus error warning I've noticed while > developing this on msm8226 - there the patches are also coming later for > this SoC since apcs is getting hooked up to cpufreq there also. > > Apart from usages

[PATCH 0/7] Use mboxes instead of syscon for APCS (arm32 & arm64)

2024-04-24 Thread Luca Weiss
The first patch is for removing a bogus error warning I've noticed while developing this on msm8226 - there the patches are also coming later for this SoC since apcs is getting hooked up to cpufreq there also. Apart from usages from the qcom,smsm driver (patches coming!) all other usages of the