Hi Rich!
Any chance we can get these patches (see below) merged for 5.12?
And let's add this one:
> - [PATCH] scripts/recordmcount.pl: support big endian for ARCH sh
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh=161296964604229=2
Adrian
Adrian
On 1/24/21 11:07 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi
Hi Rich!
The following patches are still missing after the 5.11 SH pull:
> - [PATCH] [sh] fix trivial misannotations
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=160945707001399=2
>
> - [PATCH] sh: check return code of request_irq
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=160867050030140=2
>
> - [PATCH]
Hi!
On 1/21/21 2:42 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> I will check later whether there are more patches we might have forgotten.
>
> Hi! Thanks for the list. From the names, I think some overlap with the
> pending set in linux-next (ending at a118584e7e60) that I'm about to
> send as a PR.
OK, I have
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:32:16PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Rich!
>
> I have tested or acked the following patches which are fine from my point of
> view.
>
> "Tested" means I have built and booted a current kernel with the patch in
> question,
> "acked" means, I have
Hi Rich!
I have tested or acked the following patches which are fine from my point of
view.
"Tested" means I have built and booted a current kernel with the patch in
question,
"acked" means, I have looked over the patch and consider the changes to be
correct
in the case where testing was not
5 matches
Mail list logo
