On 12/6/23 18:38, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 18:23 +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/6/23 10:12, David Gow wrote:
I'm pretty happy with this personally, though I definitely think we
need the support for tests which aren't just executable scripts (e.g.
the docs in patch 6).
On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 18:23 +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 12/6/23 10:12, David Gow wrote:
> > I'm pretty happy with this personally, though I definitely think we
> > need the support for tests which aren't just executable scripts (e.g.
> > the docs in patch 6).
> >
> > The
On 12/6/23 10:12, David Gow wrote:
I'm pretty happy with this personally, though I definitely think we
need the support for tests which aren't just executable scripts (e.g.
the docs in patch 6).
The get_maintailer.pl bits, and hence the requirement to not include
'@', feel a little bit 'off':
On 12/5/23 20:58, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 20:02 +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Require the entry values to not contain the '@' character, so they could
be distinguished from emails (always) output by get_maintainer.pl.
Why is this useful?
Why the need to distinguish?
This
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 at 02:45, Nikolai Kondrashov
wrote:
>
> Introduce a new 'V:' ("Verify") entry to MAINTAINERS. The entry accepts
> a test suite command which is proposed to be executed for each
> contribution to the subsystem.
>
> Extend scripts/get_maintainer.pl to support retrieving the V:
On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 20:02 +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Require the entry values to not contain the '@' character, so they could
> be distinguished from emails (always) output by get_maintainer.pl.
Why is this useful?
Why the need to distinguish?
Introduce a new 'V:' ("Verify") entry to MAINTAINERS. The entry accepts
a test suite command which is proposed to be executed for each
contribution to the subsystem.
Extend scripts/get_maintainer.pl to support retrieving the V: entries
when '--test' option is specified.
Require the entry values
