On 18/10/17 21:46, John Stoffel wrote:
"lejeczek" == lejeczek writes:
lejeczek> On 17/10/17 21:57, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
You still haven't said what you are trying to accomplish.
I wouldn't
have bothered responding to such a vague question until
you provided
some tantalizing clues. Unti
lejeczek schreef op 18-10-2017 17:52:
I'm still looking for an answer - if it's possible then how to split
raid10 into two raid0 LVs(with perhaps having data intact?)
I've been fiddling with --splitmirrors but either I got it wrong or I
didn't and command just fails.
More than contemplating theo
> "lejeczek" == lejeczek writes:
lejeczek> On 17/10/17 21:57, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
>> You still haven't said what you are trying to accomplish.
>> I wouldn't
>> have bothered responding to such a vague question until
>> you provided
>> some tantalizing clues. Until your lastest clues
On 17/10/17 21:57, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
You still haven't said what you are trying to accomplish.
I wouldn't
have bothered responding to such a vague question until
you provided
some tantalizing clues. Until your lastest clues, I would
have advised
using rsync or dd to copy your data to
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Tanstaafl wrote:
and is not the same as raid1+0 (raid1 on top of raid0).
Not according to everything I've ever read about it... for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_RAID_levels#Linux_MD_RAID_10
But this is not certain as raid10 works perfectly well
On 10/17/2017, 4:57:10 PM, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> First off, raid10 is a linux specialty (I didn't know LVM supported it,
> thanks!),
Eh? Not sure what you mean by that, RAID10 is used by many hardware RAID
controllers, so is certainly not some kind of esoteric linux
'specialty', unless I mis
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
thanks!), and is not the same as raid1+0 (raid1 on top of raid0).
Sorry, that is raid0 on top of raid1. With raid1 on top, then after
the first disk failure, the second failure has a 66% chance of
destroying the data. With raid0 on top, the secon
You still haven't said what you are trying to accomplish. I wouldn't
have bothered responding to such a vague question until you provided
some tantalizing clues. Until your lastest clues, I would have advised
using rsync or dd to copy your data to a new volume. But now it sounds
like you ran ou
On 16/10/17 22:16, John Stoffel wrote:
lejeczek> I'm sroogling and reading but before spend whole day doing
lejeczek> that, I was hoping you guys, gals, done conversion from
lejeczek> raid10?
Please post your configuration and explain what you're trying to do in
more detail.
lejeczek> I'm thi
lejeczek> I'm sroogling and reading but before spend whole day doing
lejeczek> that, I was hoping you guys, gals, done conversion from
lejeczek> raid10?
Please post your configuration and explain what you're trying to do in
more detail.
lejeczek> I'm thinking best(natural?) would be to convert t
hi everyone
I'm sroogling and reading but before spend whole day doing
that, I was hoping you guys, gals, done conversion from raid10?
I'm thinking best(natural?) would be to convert to two raid0
LVs, right. Am I right? Would it be optimal, and how do you
do it?
many thanks, L.
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
