Re: [PATCH/RFC] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-24 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Robert Jarzmik wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de writes: diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c index 97c93a7..5c8aabf 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/mioa701.c @@ -724,19 +724,19 @@

Re: [PATCH/RFC] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-10 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de writes: On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Robert Jarzmik wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de writes: Did you enable DEBUG? Looks like one of dev_dbg() had a (yet) invalid device pointer. I'll have to try that too. No, don't think so. I think

Re: [PATCH/RFC] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-09 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de writes: Try with the patch-stack I mentioned in the previous mail, will see then. Euh, which mail ? I can't find a reference to it. As a preparation for the weekend, my first try revealed that oops. I must admit I made that test without any

Re: [PATCH/RFC] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-09 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Robert Jarzmik wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de writes: Try with the patch-stack I mentioned in the previous mail, will see then. Euh, which mail ? I can't find a reference to it. http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg04213.html

Re: [PATCH/RFC] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-08 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Robert, On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Robert Jarzmik wrote: Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de writes: This is more or less the final version of the first step of the v4l2-subdev conversion, hence, all affected driver authors / platform maintainers are encouraged to review and test.

Re: [PATCH/RFC] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-07 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de writes: This is more or less the final version of the first step of the v4l2-subdev conversion, hence, all affected driver authors / platform maintainers are encouraged to review and test. I have eliminated OK, here goes a preliminary review for

Re: [PATCH/RFC] soc-camera: Convert to a platform driver

2009-04-07 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Robert Jarzmik robert.jarz...@free.fr writes: I'll test fully this weekend. I just made a first try, just to prepare my weekend. Even with Ming Lei patch reverted, and all statically built, I have no camera detected ... Is there something I need to know before attempting the brute force method