Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches

2010-05-21 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Mike Isely wrote: Please from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches for the following pvrusb2 driver fixes / improvements: - pvrusb2: Minor debug code fixup - pvrusb2: Fix Gotview hardware support - pvrusb2: Avoid using stack allocated buffers when performing USB I/O Your comment

Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches

2010-05-21 Thread Mike Isely
Mauro: You are reading too much into that comment. I never said it was valid to do what had been done, only that for the longest time this is what the driver did and it never caused a problem that I was made aware of. What I said there was correct, that this is what the driver had been

Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches

2010-05-21 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Mike Isely wrote: Mauro: You are reading too much into that comment. I never said it was valid to do what had been done, only that for the longest time this is what the driver did and it never caused a problem that I was made aware of. What I said there was correct, that this is what

Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches

2010-05-21 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Mike Isely wrote: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Mike Isely wrote: Mauro: You are reading too much into that comment. I never said it was valid to do what had been done, only that for the longest time this is what the driver did and it never caused a problem that I

Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches

2010-05-21 Thread Mike Isely
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Mike Isely wrote: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Mike Isely wrote: Mauro: You are reading too much into that comment. I never said it was valid to do what had been done, only that for the longest time this

Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches

2010-05-21 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Mike Isely wrote: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Mike Isely wrote: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Mike Isely wrote: Mauro: You are reading too much into that comment. I never said it was valid to do what had been done, only that for the longest

Re: [PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches

2010-05-21 Thread Mike Isely
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Mike Isely wrote: [snip] The point when the kernel started complaining about the use of a stack based USB I/O buffers is the relevant point, which was not back in 2.6.12. I learned of this behavior (that is, receiving warnings about

[PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches

2010-05-16 Thread Mike Isely
Please from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches for the following pvrusb2 driver fixes / improvements: - pvrusb2: Minor debug code fixup - pvrusb2: Fix Gotview hardware support - pvrusb2: Avoid using stack allocated buffers when performing USB I/O - pvrusb2: New feature to mark

[PULL] http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches

2010-02-21 Thread Mike Isely
Please from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2-patches for the following pvrusb2 driver fixes / improvements: - pvrusb2: Enforce a 300msec stabilization interval during stream strart - pvrusb2: Reduce encoder quiet period - pvrusb2: Adjust 300msec digitizer wait to be more selective