kopu...@mm-sol.com; Zutshi Vimarsh (Nokia-
> SD/Helsinki); Ailus Sakari (Nokia-SD/Helsinki); linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Regulator state after regulator_get
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:08:08AM +, kalle.jokini...@nokia.c
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:08:08AM +, kalle.jokini...@nokia.com wrote:
> I don't have a full set of regulators described, that's why things broke when
> I tried the regulator_full_constraints call earlier. But I don't think it
> would be too
> big issue to check the current after boot configu
m; grosikopu...@mm-sol.com; Zutshi Vimarsh (Nokia-
> SD/Helsinki); Ailus Sakari (Nokia-SD/Helsinki); linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Regulator state after regulator_get
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:01:03AM +, kalle.jokini...@nokia.
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:27:46PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> I'm not sure what "supply_nasty" would mean? This also doesn't seem
>>> like something that we can set up per supply - it's going to affect the
>>> whole regulator state, it's not somethin
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:27:46PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > I'm not sure what "supply_nasty" would mean? This also doesn't seem
> > like something that we can set up per supply - it's going to affect the
> > whole regulator state, it's not something that only affects a s
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:44:10AM +, kalle.jokini...@nokia.com wrote:
>
>> > Another alternative to the first option you proposed could be to add a
>> > flags field to regulator_consumer_supply, and use a flag to recognise
>> > regulators which need to be disabled durin
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:44:10AM +, kalle.jokini...@nokia.com wrote:
> > Another alternative to the first option you proposed could be to add a
> > flags field to regulator_consumer_supply, and use a flag to recognise
> > regulators which need to be disabled during initialisation. The fla
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:01:03AM +, kalle.jokini...@nokia.com wrote:
> If the device driver using the regulator does not enable and disable the
> regulator after regulator_get, the regulator is left in the state that it was
> after bootloader. In case of N900 this is a problem as the regulat
; saagui...@ti.com;
> grosikopu...@mm-sol.com; Zutshi Vimarsh (Nokia-SD/Helsinki); linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Laurent Pinchart
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Regulator state after regulator_get
>
> Hello,
>
> Jokiniemi Kalle (Nokia-SD/Tampere) w
Hello,
Jokiniemi Kalle (Nokia-SD/Tampere) wrote:
> Hello regulator FW and OMAP3 ISP fellows,
>
> I'm currently optimizing power management for Nokia N900 MeeGo DE release,
> and found an issue with how regulators are handled at boot.
>
> The N900 uses VAUX2 regulator in OMAP3430 to power the CSI
Hello regulator FW and OMAP3 ISP fellows,
I'm currently optimizing power management for Nokia N900 MeeGo DE release,
and found an issue with how regulators are handled at boot.
The N900 uses VAUX2 regulator in OMAP3430 to power the CSIb IO complex
that is used by the camera. While implementing re
11 matches
Mail list logo
