On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Guennadi,
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 08:47:20 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 14:39:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On
Hi Stephen,
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 17:29:24 Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/31/2012 03:22 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 14:39:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
...
Ok, then, how about
#address-cells = 1;
#size-cells = 0;
...
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Guennadi,
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 14:39:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:26:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On
Hi Guennadi,
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 08:47:20 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 14:39:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:26:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski
On 07/31/2012 11:59 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 17:29:24 Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/31/2012 03:22 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 14:39:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
...
Ok, then, how about
#address-cells = 1;
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Sylwester,
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 19:00:15 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 07/16/2012 01:41 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
[snip]
An sh-mobile CEU DT node could look like
ceu0@0xfe91 = {
Hi Guennadi,
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:26:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Sylwester,
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 19:00:15 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 07/16/2012 01:41 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
[snip]
An sh-mobile CEU DT node
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Guennadi,
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:26:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Sylwester,
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 19:00:15 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 07/16/2012 01:41 PM, Guennadi
Hi Guennadi,
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 14:39:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:26:27 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 19:00:15 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 07/31/2012 03:22 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 14:39:07 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
...
Ok, then, how about
#address-cells = 1;
#size-cells = 0;
...
ov772x-1 = {
reg = 1;
On 07/23/2012 02:14 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:00:15PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
One possible solution would be to have host/bridge drivers to register
a clkdev entry for I2C client device, so it can acquire the clock through
just clk_get(). We would have to
Hi Sylwester,
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 19:00:15 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 07/16/2012 01:41 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
[...]
On 07/11/2012 04:27 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi all
Background
==
With ARM adoption of flat Device Trees a need arises to move
Hi Hans,
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 21:37:05 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Wed July 11 2012 16:27:52 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi all
Background
==
With ARM adoption of flat Device Trees a need arises to move platform
device descriptions and their data from platform files to DT.
On Fri July 27 2012 13:26:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 21:37:05 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Wed July 11 2012 16:27:52 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi all
Background
==
With ARM adoption of flat Device Trees a need arises to move platform
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:00:15PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
One possible solution would be to have host/bridge drivers to register
a clkdev entry for I2C client device, so it can acquire the clock through
just clk_get(). We would have to ensure the clock is not tried to be
accessed
Hi Guennadi,
On 07/16/2012 01:41 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
[...]
On 07/11/2012 04:27 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi all
Background
==
With ARM adoption of flat Device Trees a need arises to move platform
device descriptions and their data from platform files to DT.
On Wed July 11 2012 16:27:52 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi all
Background
==
With ARM adoption of flat Device Trees a need arises to move platform
device descriptions and their data from platform files to DT. This has
also to be done for media devices, e.g., video capture and
Hi Sylwester
Thanks for your comments.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi,
Cc: devicetree-dissc...@lists.ozlabs.org
On 07/11/2012 04:27 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi all
Background
==
With ARM adoption of flat Device Trees a need arises to move
Hi,
Cc: devicetree-dissc...@lists.ozlabs.org
On 07/11/2012 04:27 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi all
Background
==
With ARM adoption of flat Device Trees a need arises to move platform
device descriptions and their data from platform files to DT. This has
also to be done
Hi all
Background
==
With ARM adoption of flat Device Trees a need arises to move platform
device descriptions and their data from platform files to DT. This has
also to be done for media devices, e.g., video capture and output
interfaces, data processing devices, camera sensors, TV
20 matches
Mail list logo