In article <68676e00901160808k47d51344w3e6783271625b...@mail.gmail.com>,
Luca Tettamanti wrote:
>> Is linux-media available on gmane?
>Yup, here it is:
>http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure
>
>and also:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/
You
I had previously viewed this list, and the linux-media list creation
discussion, from my narrow perspective of wanting to get a single device
working, so I only read list traffic that seemed related to that goal. The
overall reality far is larger than I had initially suspected.
Reading this t
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:06:58 -0500
Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:24 -0500, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> > I spent the morning giving some consideration to the comments people
> > made regarding the merging of the mailing lists. As with most
> > attempts at an optimization, there are
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:24 -0500, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> I spent the morning giving some consideration to the comments people
> made regarding the merging of the mailing lists. As with most
> attempts at an optimization, there are cases that get more efficient
> and cases that get less effici
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
People "in favor" of the lists being merged
118 Patrick Boettcher
205 Hans Verkuil
38 Mike Isely
196 Devin Heitmueller
"hundreds" Mauro Carvalho Chehab
People "against" of the lists being merged
2 Lars Hanisch
17 user.vdr
16 Klaus Schmidinger
2 Bob Cunningham
10 Tomas Dr
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> I spent the morning giving some consideration to the comments people
> made regarding the merging of the mailing lists. As with most
> attempts at an optimization, there are cases that get more efficient
> and cases that get less efficient. If done
you
easier work with linux-media. But without me.
Have a nice day,
Tomas
- Original Message -
From: "Devin Heitmueller"
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Cross-posting linux-media, linux-dvb etc
> I spent the morning giving some c
I spent the morning giving some consideration to the comments people
made regarding the merging of the mailing lists. As with most
attempts at an optimization, there are cases that get more efficient
and cases that get less efficient. If done properly, the important
cases improve in efficiency wh
On Tuesday 20 of January 2009, Tomas Drajsajtl wrote:
> > linux-dvb were used for DVB only. No analog tuner, Composite or S-video
>
> entries
>
> > were meant to be discussed there. Another ML were used for those
>
> discussions.
>
> And that's the case, Mauro. I guesss that many members care only
> linux-dvb were used for DVB only. No analog tuner, Composite or S-video
entries
> were meant to be discussed there. Another ML were used for those
discussions.
And that's the case, Mauro. I guesss that many members care only about DVB
like me. What will be the next step - join some audio ML? It'
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:46:27 -0800
Bob Cunningham wrote:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:13:26 +0100
> > Lars Hanisch wrote:
> >
> >> Mike Isely wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>>
> On Friday 16 January 2009 15:48:45 Patrick Boettcher wrot
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Bob Cunningham wrote:
> Reasons I'd like to keep both lists going:
> 1. My subscription requests to linux-media have yielded nothing. Anything
> broken with the approval process?
>
> 2. I agree with another poster: I only care about broadcast and cable video,
> bo
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:13:26 +0100
Lars Hanisch wrote:
Mike Isely wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2009 15:48:45 Patrick Boettcher wrote:
Hi Mauro,
Since the creation of linux-media@vger.kernel.org I'm seeing lots of
cross-p
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:53:42 +0100
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 17.01.2009 06:51, user.vdr wrote:
> > I think it's a lame idea to clump all media related stuff into one
> > mailing list from separate ml's because 1) it's too general of a topic
> > and 2) those ml's already had a lot of activity
On 17.01.2009 06:51, user.vdr wrote:
> I think it's a lame idea to clump all media related stuff into one
> mailing list from separate ml's because 1) it's too general of a topic
> and 2) those ml's already had a lot of activity on their own. The
> idea of sifting through tons of posts of no inter
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Mike Isely wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, user.vdr wrote:
> > I think it's a lame idea to clump all media related stuff into one
> > mailing list from separate ml's because 1) it's too general of a topic
> > and 2) those ml's already had a lot of activity on their own. The
> >
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, user.vdr wrote:
> I think it's a lame idea to clump all media related stuff into one
> mailing list from separate ml's because 1) it's too general of a topic
> and 2) those ml's already had a lot of activity on their own. The
> idea of sifting through tons of posts of no inte
I think it's a lame idea to clump all media related stuff into one
mailing list from separate ml's because 1) it's too general of a topic
and 2) those ml's already had a lot of activity on their own. The
idea of sifting through tons of posts of no interest is quite a hassle
to say the least. This
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> Why not closing linux-dvb (and video4linux) and transferring the currently
> subscribed users to linux-media automatically?
Can I offer my opinions to differ?
First, I'm only subscribed to -dvb in order to post, yet still
I haven't posted what I o
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:59:12 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Instead of just removing the ML, maybe the better is to change the reply to to
> linux-media and send an autoreply message to the sender.
Done. Any posts to linux-dvb will receive this message:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:59:48 +0100
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:13:26 +0100
Lars Hanisch wrote:
> Mike Isely wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> >> On Friday 16 January 2009 15:48:45 Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> >>> Hi Mauro,
> >>>
> >>> Since the creation of linux-media@vger.kernel.org I'm seeing lots of
> >>> cros
Mike Isely wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Friday 16 January 2009 15:48:45 Patrick Boettcher wrote:
Hi Mauro,
Since the creation of linux-media@vger.kernel.org I'm seeing lots of
cross-postings between linux-dvb, linux-media and video4linux. This
is a little bit annoying if
Mike Isely writes:
> Amen to that. I've been telling people to go over to linux-media, but
> old habits are hard to break. It's time to actually make a clean break
> from the old lists.
Is linux-media available on gmane?
/Benny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> Mike Isely writes:
>
>> Amen to that. I've been telling people to go over to linux-media, but
>> old habits are hard to break. It's time to actually make a clean break
>> from the old lists.
>
> Is linux-media available on gmane?
Yup, her
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 15:48:45 Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > Since the creation of linux-media@vger.kernel.org I'm seeing lots of
> > cross-postings between linux-dvb, linux-media and video4linux. This
> > is a little bit annoying if
On Friday 16 January 2009 15:48:45 Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Since the creation of linux-media@vger.kernel.org I'm seeing lots of
> cross-postings between linux-dvb, linux-media and video4linux. This
> is a little bit annoying if you are subscribed to all of those lists.
>
> Worse is
Hi Mauro,
Since the creation of linux-media@vger.kernel.org I'm seeing lots of
cross-postings between linux-dvb, linux-media and video4linux. This is a
little bit annoying if you are subscribed to all of those lists.
Worse is, that some people only send requests to linux-media. Like that
lin
27 matches
Mail list logo
