On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:46:23 +0100 Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch
> soon? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244201/
There are MANY posted but unmerged patches in patchwork from the linux-media
mailing list. What is goi
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:46:23 +0100 Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch
>> soon? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244201/
>
> There are MANY posted but unmerged patch
Manu Abraham writes:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:46:23 +0100 Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch
>>> soon? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244201/
>>
>> There ar
Em 22-03-2011 06:53, Bjørn Mork escreveu:
> Manu Abraham writes:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:46:23 +0100 Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
>>>
Hello,
I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch
soon? https:
Hello Manu,
> Actually, quite a lot of effort was put in to get that part right. It
> does the reverse thing that's to be done.
> The revamped version is here [1] If the issue persists still, then it
> needs to be investigated further.
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxtv-commits@linuxtv.or
Rico Tzschichholz writes:
>> Actually, quite a lot of effort was put in to get that part right. It
>> does the reverse thing that's to be done.
>> The revamped version is here [1] If the issue persists still, then it
>> needs to be investigated further.
>>
>> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Manu Abraham writes:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:46:23 +0100 Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
>>>
Hello,
I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch
so
Hello Rico,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
> Hello Manu,
>
>> Actually, quite a lot of effort was put in to get that part right. It
>> does the reverse thing that's to be done.
>> The revamped version is here [1] If the issue persists still, then it
>> needs to be inves
Hello Manu,
you are absolutely right, thanks for pointing this out.
Looking forward to the stb0899-patch inclusion.
Best Regards,
Rico
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi list,
Follow up to: [1]
@Manu: Your argumentation is inconsistent and lacks any proof.
Running a full scan of Astra 19.2 E with Kaffeine together with cards model
Skystar HD and Twinhan/Azurewave VP-1041 results in a channel list of approx
400 stations only. When I apply my patch then almos
Hi,
Am 23.03.2011 19:19, schrieb H. Ellenberger:
@Manu: Your argumentation is inconsistent and lacks any proof.
Running a full scan of Astra 19.2 E with Kaffeine together with cards model
Skystar HD and Twinhan/Azurewave VP-1041 results in a channel list of approx
400 stations only. When I appl
2011/3/24 Julian Scheel :
> Hi,
>
> Am 23.03.2011 19:19, schrieb H. Ellenberger:
>>
>> @Manu: Your argumentation is inconsistent and lacks any proof.
>>
>> Running a full scan of Astra 19.2 E with Kaffeine together with cards
>> model
>> Skystar HD and Twinhan/Azurewave VP-1041 results in a channel
Am 24.03.2011 19:32, schrieb Steffen Barszus:
It has been done some work (and effort), to prove its having positive
effect. you should allways
have more then 1000 stations at any time on that SAT, if you see that maximum
number of stations is somewhere at 1600. everything around 400 is
broken har
Hi list,
Follow up to: [1]
I did testing with a TechniSat SkyStar HD 2 (1ae4:0003).
- without a patch: card unuseable, gets locks only rarely
- with Manu's patch: card useable, gets locks, but sometimes this still
needs some seconds
- with the mentioned stb0899 patch: card useable, gets locks,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Paul Franke wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Follow up to: [1]
>
> I did testing with a TechniSat SkyStar HD 2 (1ae4:0003).
>
> - without a patch: card unuseable, gets locks only rarely
> - with Manu's patch: card useable, gets locks, but sometimes this still
> needs some sec
> Can you guys, (who seem to really need the said patch) please provide
> me the STB0899 chipset version on your card ?
Sure. For a TechniSat SkyStar HD 2 (1ae4:0003)...
> C6L STB0899 VQ940KDA12 22 9BS VQ MLT 22 012
> C2L STB0899 VQ636DSK22 09C VQ MLT 22 656
> C1L STB0899 VQ608FSD22 OPD
On 03/21/2011 08:46 PM, Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch
soon? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244201/
Currently using 2.6.38 results in switching-timeouts on my S2-3200 and
this patch fixes this for good.
So it would be ni
On 08/11/2011 01:49 AM, P. van Gaans wrote:
On 03/21/2011 08:46 PM, Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if there is any intention to include this patch
soon? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244201/
Currently using 2.6.38 results in switching-timeouts on my S2-3200 and
this
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 23:23 PM, Manu Abraham wrote:
>
>Can you guys, (who seem to really need the said patch) please provide
>me the STB0899 chipset version on your card ?
>
2 x Twinhan VP-1041 Rev 1.0:
C2L STB0899 VQ637XDV 22 0P9 VQ MLT 22 651
C2L STB0899 VQ628PZF 8P CB5 VQ TWN 22 644
Can
19 matches
Mail list logo
