On Monday 21 September 2009 19:23:54 Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Sunday 13 September 2009 08:13:04 Nathaniel Kim wrote:
2009. 9. 12., 오전 7:21, Hans Verkuil 작성:
Hans,
First of all I'm very sorry that I had not enough time to go through
your new RFC. I'll checkout right
Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Sunday 13 September 2009 08:13:04 Nathaniel Kim wrote:
2009. 9. 12., 오전 7:21, Hans Verkuil 작성:
Hans,
First of all I'm very sorry that I had not enough time to go through
your new RFC. I'll checkout right after posting this mail.
I think this is a good approach and I
On Saturday 12 September 2009 00:21:48 Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the discussions of
the media controller as a concept.
[snip]
What sort of interaction do we need with sub-devices?
[snip]
2) Private ioctls. Basically a way to
From the kernel point of view, (most of) the various sub-devices in a
media
device are arranged in a tree of kernel objects. Most of the time we have
an
I2C controller and various devices sitting on the I2C bus, one or several
video devices that sit on some internal bus (usually a SoC
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:50 PM, david may david.ma...@ntlworld.com wrote:
OC you do realize that IF the DVB/linuxTV devs cant even make a simple and
quick LiveCD with a VLC and streaming apps clients and servers connecting to
a web sever some were
for popping into ANY laptop that happens to
[mche...@infradead.org]
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 7:31 PM
To: wk
Cc: Hans Verkuil; linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Media controller: sysfs vs ioctl
Em Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:54:11 +0200
wk handygewinnsp...@gmx.de escreveu:
Hans Verkuil schrieb:
Hi all,
I've started
2009. 9. 12., 오전 7:21, Hans Verkuil 작성:
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the
discussions of the
media controller as a concept.
First of all, I have no doubt that everything that you can do with
an ioctl,
you can also do with sysfs and vice versa. That's not
On Sunday 13 September 2009 08:13:04 Nathaniel Kim wrote:
2009. 9. 12., 오전 7:21, Hans Verkuil 작성:
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the
discussions of the
media controller as a concept.
First of all, I have no doubt that everything that you can do
Em Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:13:04 +0900
Nathaniel Kim dongsoo@gmail.com escreveu:
2009. 9. 12., 오전 7:21, Hans Verkuil 작성:
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the
discussions of the
media controller as a concept.
First of all, I have no doubt that
On Sunday 13 September 2009 15:27:57 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:13:04 +0900
Nathaniel Kim dongsoo@gmail.com escreveu:
2009. 9. 12., 오전 7:21, Hans Verkuil 작성:
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the
discussions of the
Em Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:43:02 +0200
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
On Sunday 13 September 2009 15:27:57 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:13:04 +0900
Nathaniel Kim dongsoo@gmail.com escreveu:
2009. 9. 12., 오전 7:21, Hans Verkuil 작성:
Hi all,
Hans Verkuil schrieb:
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the discussions of the
media controller as a concept.
First of all, I have no doubt that everything that you can do with an ioctl,
you can also do with sysfs and vice versa. That's not the problem here.
The
On Sunday 13 September 2009 17:54:11 wk wrote:
Hans Verkuil schrieb:
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the discussions of
the
media controller as a concept.
First of all, I have no doubt that everything that you can do with an ioctl,
you can also do
Em Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:21:48 +0200
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the discussions of the
media controller as a concept.
First of all, I have no doubt that everything that you can do with an ioctl,
you can also do
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@infradead.org wrote:
True. Choosing the better approach is very important since, once merged, we'll
need to stick it for a very long time.
I saw your proposal of a ioctl-only implementation for the media control. It
is
important
Em Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:41:58 -0400
Devin Heitmueller dheitmuel...@kernellabs.com escreveu:
I respectfully disagree.
Are you suggesting that we should not submit any patches upstream during this
merge window in order to discuss this? Sorry, but this is not right with all
the developers that did
Em Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:12:35 +0200
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
Why? Nothing stops discussing it there and better prepare a proposal, but,
considering all the noise we had after the DVB S2API last year, I don't
think
we should ever repeat using a conference, where only some
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 12:54 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:12:35 +0200
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
I'm currently trying to get ivtv media-controller-aware. It's probably the
most complex driver when it comes to topology that I have access to, so
Em Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:48:23 -0400
Andy Walls awa...@radix.net escreveu:
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 12:54 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:12:35 +0200
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl escreveu:
I'm currently trying to get ivtv media-controller-aware. It's probably
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the discussions of the
media controller as a concept.
First of all, I have no doubt that everything that you can do with an ioctl,
you can also do with sysfs and vice versa. That's not the problem here.
The problem is deciding which
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 00:21 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the discussions of the
media controller as a concept.
First of all, I have no doubt that everything that you can do with an ioctl,
you can also do with sysfs and vice
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 11.09.2009, 19:01 -0400 schrieb Andy Walls:
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 00:21 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Hi all,
I've started this as a new thread to prevent polluting the discussions of
the
media controller as a concept.
First of all, I have no doubt that
22 matches
Mail list logo
