On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Kyungmin,
>
> > It's already patched. you can find it easily at list.
>
> I think you're talking about this patch from Zhangfei:
>
> From: Zhangfei Gao
> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:15:32 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] sdhci: support MMC_CAP_MMC_H
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Jaehoon Chung
>
> If controller use SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION quirk,
> controller need always polling detect
>
> In this case, always generated interrupt.Because controller checked card
> status.
> I
On 08/28/2010 07:33 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Andrew, Nicolas,
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 07:39:29PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> From: Wolfgang Muees
>>
>> Fixes two pointer errors, one which leads to memory overwrites if used with
>> large chunks of data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Muees
After discovering a problem in regulator reference counting I
took Mark Brown's advice to move the reference count into the
MMC core by making the regulator status a member of
struct mmc_host.
I took this opportunity to also implement NULL versions of
the regulator functions so as to rid the drive
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:37 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:28:23PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any comments on this patch from the list?
>
> Are there no users of this patch? Who would want this? We generally
> don't add infrastructure to the kernel without
2010/8/29 Mark Brown :
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 04:48:58PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> 2010/8/27 Chris Ball :
>
>> > Looks like this patch got dropped because of the missing modifications
>> > to arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c. Are we still interested in the
>> > patch otherwise, and can an
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 04:48:58PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2010/8/27 Chris Ball :
> > Looks like this patch got dropped because of the missing modifications
> > to arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c. Are we still interested in the
> > patch otherwise, and can anyone help with that?
> Actual
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:37 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:28:23PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any comments on this patch from the list?
>
> Are there no users of this patch? Who would want this? We generally
> don't add infrastructure to the kernel without a
