Thomas Abraham wrote:
>
> The sdhci platform helper function that sets up the default controller
> configuration is removed for all Samsung platforms since such default
> controller configuration can be handled by the driver.
>
> Cc: Ben Dooks
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
> ---
> arch/arm/m
Thomas Abraham wrote:
>
> The default controller configuration which was previously setup by
> platform helper functions is moved into the driver.
>
> Cc: Ben Dooks
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c | 28 +---
> 1 files changed, 17 i
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:26:34PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> A simple cosmetic clean-up, no functional changes. Patch 2/2 depends on
> patch 1/2 and can wait until 3.3. Paul, would you be able to put it under
> the carpet somewhere until then or shall I resend it after 3.2-rc1 is out?
Hi Thomas.
I have some question. This patch looks good.
Some names are used S3C_SDHCI_. but some names are used S3C64XX_SDHCI_.
Do you know what differ them?
Thanks,
Jaehoon Chung
Thomas Abraham wrote:
> The default controller configuration which was previously setup by
> platform helpe
This patch ensured the CIU-reset.
If data0 line is low, bit[9] in status register is set to 1.
Then we can know the card is busy.
Using this bit in status register, we can ensure to reset the CIU correctly.
When card is busy and doing ciu-reset, seem like reset completed.
But actually didn't comp
2011/9/4 Linus Walleij :
> 2011/9/2 NamJae Jeon :
>
>> We should consider DMA situation. As I know, host controller can not
>> rise timeout interrupt in write not read in DMA status.
>
> Which host controller are you talking about?
As I know, this controller is using on many ARM core. I can not
dis
