On Tuesday 19 April 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> What is wrong in wanting to support non-technical users?
> Especially since there are no backward compatible issues
> involved at all.
It's good to support non-technical users. Things that are
bad about your patch are:
* Have interfaces that work only
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:10 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 April 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> > The purpose of this read-only interface is for VUB300 support
> > staff to obtain information from our customers. Our customers
> > are not like the people on this list. If you have ever tried
On Tuesday 19 April 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> The purpose of this read-only interface is for VUB300 support
> staff to obtain information from our customers. Our customers
> are not like the people on this list. If you have ever tried
> to do telephone support you would appreciate the difficulty
>
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 17:23 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 10 March 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
...
> > +static ssize_t __show_operating_mode(struct vub300_mmc_host *vub300,
> > + struct mmc_host *mmc, char *buf)
> > +{
> > + int usb_packet_size = vub3
see embedded answers:-
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 17:23 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 10 March 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> > Add a driver for Elan Digital System's VUB300 chip
> > which is a USB connected SDIO/SDmem/MMC host controller.
> > A VUB300 chip enables a USB 2.0 or USB 1.1 connect
On Thursday 10 March 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> Add a driver for Elan Digital System's VUB300 chip
> which is a USB connected SDIO/SDmem/MMC host controller.
> A VUB300 chip enables a USB 2.0 or USB 1.1 connected host
> computer to use SDIO/SD/MMC cards without the need for
> a directly connected,
On Tuesday 15 March 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
> I thought about it, but I think staging drivers generally have a much
> larger TODO list than this one would.
>
> Perhaps a good plan is: I'll push it to mmc-next after the 2.6.39 merge,
> then I'll try to work on style changes a bit (I'll send each p
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Mar 15 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> I'm leaning towards merging it as-is and then
>> working on incremental fixes; please yell if that sounds like a bad idea.
>
> What about staging? From my all overall impression, the driver would fit
> there.
> Also, there are more people lu
Hi,
> linux-mmc@ folks, any strong opinions on this driver? My impression is
> that it looks reasonable, but has some areas of being pretty far from
> standard CodingStyle.
I totally agree (sadly it is hard to review because of its size) and I am still
not convinced of the sysfs-entry. Then agai
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 10 2011, Tony Olech wrote:
> Add a driver for Elan Digital System's VUB300 chip
> which is a USB connected SDIO/SDmem/MMC host controller.
> A VUB300 chip enables a USB 2.0 or USB 1.1 connected host
> computer to use SDIO/SD/MMC cards without the need for
> a directly connected, fo
10 matches
Mail list logo
