On 27 January 2014 11:40, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 23/01/14 16:59, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2014 15:29, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 23/01/14 15:21, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2014 11:09, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On
On 28/01/14 14:39, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 27 January 2014 11:40, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 23/01/14 16:59, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2014 15:29, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 23/01/14 15:21, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2014 11:09, Adrian
On 28 January 2014 15:45, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 28/01/14 14:39, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 27 January 2014 11:40, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 23/01/14 16:59, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2014 15:29, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On
On 23/01/14 16:59, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2014 15:29, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 23/01/14 15:21, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2014 11:09, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 22/01/14 17:00, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Hosts supporting
On 22/01/14 17:00, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Hosts supporting MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY shall not be waiting for busy
detection completion in the recovery path, which were the case when
using R1B response.
Start using R1 as response instead to align behavior, no matter if
MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY is
On 23 January 2014 11:09, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 22/01/14 17:00, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Hosts supporting MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY shall not be waiting for busy
detection completion in the recovery path, which were the case when
using R1B response.
Start using R1 as
On 23/01/14 15:21, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2014 11:09, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 22/01/14 17:00, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Hosts supporting MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY shall not be waiting for busy
detection completion in the recovery path, which were the case when
using
On 23 January 2014 15:29, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 23/01/14 15:21, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 23 January 2014 11:09, Adrian Hunter adrian.hun...@intel.com wrote:
On 22/01/14 17:00, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Hosts supporting MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY shall not be waiting for busy
Hosts supporting MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY shall not be waiting for busy
detection completion in the recovery path, which were the case when
using R1B response.
Start using R1 as response instead to align behavior, no matter if
MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY is supported or not.
Signed-off-by: Ulf
