On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Philip Rakity prak...@marvell.com wrote:
On Apr 13, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
Hi. Venkatraman.
You fixed 10 times. why is it 10 times ?
and checking err from mmc_send_status is not needed ? is it also
infinite case ?
Thanks.
2012/4/13
Hi,
I see 2 fixes for existing mmc_interrupt_hpi() function:
- [PATCH 4/4] mmc: core: Send HPI only till it is successful
- [PATCH v2] mmc: core: Fix the HPI execution sequence
They are exclusive. Can you explain how final solution will look like?
Thanks,
Kostya
Try to send HPI only a fixed
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:52 PM, kdorf...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Hi,
I see 2 fixes for existing mmc_interrupt_hpi() function:
- [PATCH 4/4] mmc: core: Send HPI only till it is successful
- [PATCH v2] mmc: core: Fix the HPI execution sequence
They are exclusive. Can you explain how final
On Apr 13, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
Hi. Venkatraman.
You fixed 10 times. why is it 10 times ?
and checking err from mmc_send_status is not needed ? is it also
infinite case ?
Thanks.
2012/4/13 Venkatraman S svenk...@ti.com:
Try to send HPI only a fixed number of times
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 13 2012, Venkatraman S wrote:
Try to send HPI only a fixed number of times till it is
successful. One successful transfer is enough - but wait
till the card comes out of transfer state.
Return an error if the card was not in programming state to
begin with - so that the
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 13 2012, Venkatraman S wrote:
Try to send HPI only a fixed number of times till it is
successful. One successful transfer is enough - but wait
till the card comes out of transfer state.
Return an error if the
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Jae hoon Chung jh80.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Venkatraman
2012/4/14 Namjae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com:
2012/4/14 S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Namjae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. Venkatraman.
You fixed 10 times. why
Hi Venkatraman
2012/4/14 Namjae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com:
2012/4/14 S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Namjae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. Venkatraman.
You fixed 10 times. why is it 10 times ?
There's no right number - I haven't seen it fail much in my
Try to send HPI only a fixed number of times till it is
successful. One successful transfer is enough - but wait
till the card comes out of transfer state.
Return an error if the card was not in programming state to
begin with - so that the caller knows that HPI was not sent.
Reported-by: Alex
Hi. Venkatraman.
You fixed 10 times. why is it 10 times ?
and checking err from mmc_send_status is not needed ? is it also
infinite case ?
Thanks.
2012/4/13 Venkatraman S svenk...@ti.com:
Try to send HPI only a fixed number of times till it is
successful. One successful transfer is enough -
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Namjae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. Venkatraman.
You fixed 10 times. why is it 10 times ?
There's no right number - I haven't seen it fail much in my tests but
should allow a few retries.
and checking err from mmc_send_status is not needed ? is it
2012/4/14 S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Namjae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. Venkatraman.
You fixed 10 times. why is it 10 times ?
There's no right number - I haven't seen it fail much in my tests but
should allow a few retries.
Is there the reason
12 matches
Mail list logo
