On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Jeongbae Seo wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>
>> Hi Kyungmin, Ben,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:18:12AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park
Chris wrote:
> Hi Kyungmin, Ben,
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:18:12AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > >> Well there are two implementations. and no concl
Hi Kyungmin, Ben,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:18:12AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >> Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet.
> >> as s5pc210 don
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet.
>> as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the
>> function operation itself when s5pc210.
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:08:28PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet.
> as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the
> function operation itself when s5pc210. System LSI use the quirks.
>
> Choose any one from MMC maint
> From: Kukjin Kim [mailto:kgene@samsung.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:22 AM
> To: 'Jeongbae Seo'; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: ben-li...@fluff.org; a...@linux-foundation.
Jeongbae Seo wrote:
>
> From: Hyuk Lee
>
> This patch adds to support no internal clock divider in SDHCI.
> The external clock divider can be used to make a proper clock
> because SDHCI doesn't support internal clock divider by itself.
>
Hi,
Please add Chris Ball who is a maintainer of MMC su
Kyungmin Park wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet.
> as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the
> function operation itself when s5pc210. System LSI use the quirks.
>
I think, this approach is better. Because no added new quirk and n
Hi,
Well there are two implementations. and no conclusion yet.
as s5pc210 don't support internal SDHCI clock, DMC overrides the
function operation itself when s5pc210. System LSI use the quirks.
Choose any one from MMC maintainer.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Jeongb
