Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-29 Thread Stas Sergeev
Hello. Lars BjÛrndal wrote: Thank you! Now, wp.exe works perfect! Fine. Now we know that was just another exepack bug, not fixable by loadfix btw. The note should even be added in FAQ I think, because nobody knows how many bugs will we chaise in a future thanks to an exepack (and UPX!) authors.

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-28 Thread Stas Sergeev
Hello. Bart Oldeman wrote: a) the DOS time is the same as in the previous PIC call. PIC schedules the next activation time and then works in polling mode to see when that time is reached. Even when it reached, there are no guarantees that it is possible to fire the int right away, so it can

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-28 Thread Lars Bjørndal
Bart Oldeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Lars Bjørndal wrote: I've noticed that if I use dosemu-1.0.1, the mem-command gives, in the line largest executable program size 617K, 1.1.3.5, the same command and config gives 611K. Why, do you think? This problem was caused by

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-28 Thread Lars Bjørndal
Thank you! Now, wp.exe works perfect! Lars Bart Oldeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Lars Bjørndal wrote: How do I unpack the wp.exe-file? try this: http://www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/msdos/execomp/unp411.zip I don't completely understand the log

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-28 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Lars Bjørndal wrote: Bart Oldeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Lars Bjørndal wrote: I've noticed that if I use dosemu-1.0.1, the mem-command gives, in the line largest executable program size 617K, 1.1.3.5, the same command and config gives 611K.

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-27 Thread Lars Bjørndal
How do I unpack the wp.exe-file? I've tried loadfix c:\wp51\wp.exe. Doing this command two times, results in the same error. Hartmut Figge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [Stas Sergeev]: Btw, wp.exe is exepack'ed. To my memory exepack was a constant source of troubles (Packed file corrupt and

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-27 Thread Stas Sergeev
Hello. Lars BjÛrndal wrote: I've noticed that if I use dosemu-1.0.1, the mem-command gives, in the line largest executable program size 617K, 1.1.3.5, the same command and config gives 611K. Why, do you think? I can recall only one change in a memory allocation algo of that times, which is

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-27 Thread Stas Sergeev
Hello. Hartmut Figge wrote: Looking in the folder, in which ancient batch files resides, shows e.g. push.bat, which contains the line 'loadfix push'. That cured the problem with the 'corrupte file' and was the only way, to use that game. I don't agree. loadfix works around the exepack bugs by

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-10-27 Thread Hartmut Figge
[Stas Sergeev]: Hartmut Figge wrote: Looking in the folder, in which ancient batch files resides, shows e.g. push.bat, which contains the line 'loadfix push'. That cured the problem with the 'corrupte file' and was the only way, to use that game. I don't agree. loadfix works around the

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-09-28 Thread Lars Bjørndal
OK! I've now tried 1.0.1, and the problem isn't there. The configuratin is exactly the same. Lars Stas Sergeev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello. Lars Bjørndal wrote: Still the same problem, also with dosemu-1.1.3.4. I tried to reproduce that problem on many of the latest dosemus with

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-09-28 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Lars Bjxrndal wrote: OK! I've now tried 1.0.1, and the problem isn't there. The configuratin is exactly the same. How about 1.0.2.1 and 1.1.3? Just doing a binary search to see where the problem appeared would help a lot to identify the bug. Bart - To unsubscribe from

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-09-28 Thread Lars Bjørndal
Bart Oldeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Lars Bjxrndal wrote: OK! I've now tried 1.0.1, and the problem isn't there. The configuratin is exactly the same. How about 1.0.2.1 and 1.1.3? Just doing a binary search to see where the problem appeared would help a lot to

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-09-28 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Lars Bjxrndal wrote: Bart Oldeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Lars Bjxrndal wrote: OK! I've now tried 1.0.1, and the problem isn't there. The configuratin is exactly the same. How about 1.0.2.1 and 1.1.3? Just doing a binary search to see

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-09-27 Thread Lars Bjørndal
Still the same problem, also with dosemu-1.1.3.4. I've used v.1.0.1.0 for a long time, and this problem wasn't there. Bart Oldeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Lars Bjxrndal wrote: On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bart Oldeman wrote: On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Lars Bjxrndal wrote:

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-09-19 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Lars Bjxrndal wrote: On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Bart Oldeman wrote: On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Lars Bjxrndal wrote: :Start Dosemu :Start wp51\wp :Exit wp :Start wp51\wp again Then, dosemu exits, and This message occure: please be more specific: what does

Bug in the latest version

2002-09-18 Thread Lars Bjørndal
:Start Dosemu :Start wp51\wp :Exit wp :Start wp51\wp again Then, dosemu exits, and This message occure: ERROR: unexpected CPU exception 0x06 err=0x cr2= while in vm86 (DOS) Program=sigsegv.c, Line=193 EIP: c000:c3cf ESP: c000:18e2 VFLAGS(b): 0 00110010 0110 EAX:

Re: Bug in the latest version

2002-09-18 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Lars Bjxrndal wrote: :Start Dosemu :Start wp51\wp :Exit wp :Start wp51\wp again Then, dosemu exits, and This message occure: please be more specific: what does the latest version mean? 1.0.2.1? 1.1.3? 1.1.3.4? Bart - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line