Oh. From what you sent this time, it does look like the NIC is being
detected, but RH cannot assign an IP address to the interface. I'm not
entirely sure of this, though, based on the details of what you quote, namely:
>"Checking for New Hardware
> .
> .
>
> Based on the information provided earlier, if the router can handle 100
> speed, then you are attempting to use 100baseTX ethernet, if not, you
> are attempting to use 10baseT ethernet.
>
> One final question: Am I right in assuming that you are trying to set it
> up with the AMD under Linux as
> No no no. If RH cannot detect the NIC, then the problem is inside the
> computer. Things like cabling come way later. (But if the problem is NOT
> NIC detection ... see below ... then the problem could be in the cabling,
> evn if the lights indicate a connection. Do you ever see actual traffi
Hi Ray and Peter!
> From your report, it is difficult to know what is really happening. I
> would **guess**, though, that fonts are not your real problem.
After I linked them statically, and the problem continued to appear, I thought
about this too...
> What are the basics of your hardware? E
On Sunday 04 August 2002 04:55, Enrique Nieves wrote:
> Ray,
>
> Thanks for your query. I've placed a response after each of your questions
> below.
> Another possibility may be the cable itself; however, the router lights
> indicate the
> cable is connected.
>
> EN
A few questions from me;
Wha
At 12:55 AM 8/4/02 -0400, Enrique Nieves wrote:
>Ray,
>
>Thanks for your query. I've placed a response after each of your questions
>below.
>Another possibility may be the cable itself; however, the router lights
>indicate the
>cable is connected.
No no no. If RH cannot detect the NIC, then the
