RE: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 11:09 AM 2/16/2005 +0700, frans toruan wrote: [...] # fx > Preliminary comment: When asking for technical help, never tell us # fx > what the # fx > response is "something like". Take the time to write it down and tell # fx > us # fx > what it actually is, and the exact command it is response to

RE: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread frans toruan
Many thanks for your comments, # fx > # fx > Does your ISP have its own DNS servers? If so, you might need to use # fx > dhcpcd (some # fx > ISPs require you to use their own DNS servers to reduce network # fx > load.) Yes, 202.134.0.155 and 202.134.2.5 are DNS servers of our ISP. I already inp

RE: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread frans toruan
# fx > Hi, Frans: # fx > # fx > 10.234.16.101fxrhl90 workstation's LAN interface # fx > 10.234.16.99 ? gateway's LAN interface # fx > 202.134.0.155nsjkt1.telkom.net.idgateway's WAN interface # fx > ? # fx > 202.134.2.5 ns2.telkom.n

RE: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread frans toruan
# fx > I don't quite understand this last sentence. The gateway number # fx > should be # fx > the LAN address of your router ... probably 10.234.16.99, based on Yes, you are right. # fx > what you # fx > report below ... not (for example) the public address by which that # fx > router # fx > (pr

Re: ssh as proxy?

2005-02-15 Thread James Miller
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Eric Bambach wrote: > Yep, you're 95% of the way there. > Instead of the -L option try the -D option. This works to circumvent IRC > restrictions for me in school ;) > Im not too well read on ssh forwarding so I dont know the technical difference > between them, but it seems -

Re: ssh as proxy?

2005-02-15 Thread Eric Bambach
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 05:02 pm, James Miller wrote: > I've run across some material on the web recently that piqued my interest > owing to a situation we'll be faced with while on vacation. The situation > is as follows: we'll have access to a DSL connection for internet, but the > service bl

Re: Mouse grab and multiple desktops

2005-02-15 Thread Eric Bambach
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 09:00 am, you wrote: > Eric Bambach wrote: > >Hello, > > I am not a newbie but its sort of a newbie question so here goes. Note, > > these are PHYSICAL X desktops, not the kde virtual ones. > > > >I run multiple desktops (seperate kde 3.3 desktops, not xinerama). Is > >

ssh as proxy?

2005-02-15 Thread James Miller
I've run across some material on the web recently that piqued my interest owing to a situation we'll be faced with while on vacation. The situation is as follows: we'll have access to a DSL connection for internet, but the service blocks all but http/https traffic. So, no ftp'ing, instant messaging

Re: detecting eth0 with fedora core 2

2005-02-15 Thread Jim Nelson
Karthik Vishwanath wrote: Hello, We got a new machine at work with an intel [EMAIL PROTECTED] from Dell [model: Optiplex GX280] with an Intel broadcom(r) NIC. I installed fedora core 2 by replacing the windows partition, which installed painlessly. However, I am unable to "see" eth0 via a /sbin

detecting eth0 with fedora core 2

2005-02-15 Thread Karthik Vishwanath
Hello, We got a new machine at work with an intel [EMAIL PROTECTED] from Dell [model: Optiplex GX280] with an Intel broadcom(r) NIC. I installed fedora core 2 by replacing the windows partition, which installed painlessly. However, I am unable to "see" eth0 via a /sbin/ifconfig eth0 (I get a m

Re: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread Ray Olszewski
Comments interspersed. At 03:14 PM 2/15/2005 +0700, GA Dept PT ACBI wrote: I just installed RHL90, as workstation, and connected to our internal LAN. Now, I tried to connect to the net via our ADSL. But failed, via Mozilla browser, sendmail, or any other. The ADSL's IP number as default gateway was

Re: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread chuck gelm
GA Dept PT ACBI wrote: I just installed RHL90, as workstation, and connected to our internal LAN. Now, I tried to connect to the net via our ADSL. But failed, via Mozilla browser, sendmail, or any other. The ADSL's IP number as default gateway was already put into the routing table. I can ping to

Re: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread Jim Nelson
GA Dept PT ACBI wrote: Data from /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth0 : DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=10.234.16.255 IPADDR=10.234.16.101 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=10.234.16.0 ONBOOT=yes HWADDR=00:0c:6e:6b:4e:c2 USERCTL=no PEERDNS=no GATEWAY=10.234.16.99 TYPE=Ethernet Does your IS

ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread GA Dept PT ACBI
I just installed RHL90, as workstation, and connected to our internal LAN. Now, I tried to connect to the net via our ADSL. But failed, via Mozilla browser, sendmail, or any other. The ADSL's IP number as default gateway was already put into the routing table. I can ping to the external IP number