On Wednesday 18 June 2003 13:51, Amin wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:25:33 +0300, Halil Demirezen
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, they all seem nice for initial. And extra, bh processing, spinlocks
> > and usage of semaphores in linux kernel, the cache tables.. etc etc.
> >
> > I am lookin
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adam Luchjenbroers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:05 PM
> Subject: Passing the entire command line
>
> > While bash can retrieve the different commandline values using the
>
> variables
>
> > $1, $2, $3, etc
ccomplished. If you want to copy
everything, including all sub-directories, you can forget the asterisk and
simply use the -R option to cp.
Regards,
jimmo
>
> Thanks again!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
On Monday 14 October 2002 20:38, Paul Kraus wrote:
> Now with this change
> string="My Documents/*"
> cp "$string" /tmp
>
> cp: cannot stat 'My Documents/*':no such file or directory
Sure because the token that is passed to the cp command includes the asterisk,
it doesn't know that it should e
Hi Dave!
I am not a Javascript expert, but I know that this is a common problem. I use
Overlib on my web site and there are a number of different places where the
code explicitely checks whether you have IE or Netscape. I worked with an
overlib "guru" who helped me get it working for Konqueror
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 21:35, Paul Kraus wrote:
> Can you defrag a Linux drive I think the partition is ext3. Do they need
> deframenting?
>
Typically there is no reason to defragement any *nix filesystem. Many are
designed to keep fragmentation at a minimum and do to the nature of a
multi-
The problem I see with both the amerpsand and the asterisks is that the shell
expands them before passing them to tar. Using a single quote should
protected them. If you want the entire ./PM65/Orthotic Cat/ directory, try:
tar xvf /dev/rStp0 'PM65/Orthotic Cat/'
This *should* pass the whole ph
On Monday 30 September 2002 22:12, pa3gcu wrote:
> Network Admin ? and he needs to ask this.
>
> Several mails a day and if i may say so most of the questions are solvable
> with a simple reading of the manuals.
>
> One would think, if one is a Network Administrator, then he/she would kno
On Thursday 25 July 2002 01:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,.
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, James Mohr wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 July 2002 09:07, Mike Castle wrote:
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > >
> > > James Mohr <[EMAIL PRO
HI All!
Please remember to start a new threat when the topic changes, especially as if
the new topic is so dramtically different as in this case. For those of us
who use threadable mail readers, it is really annoying to have topics mixed
like this.
Regards,
jimmo
--
---
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 09:07, Mike Castle wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> James Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You need to tell -exec which file to process. This is done with curly
> > braces:
> >
> >find /mnt/c/ -name *.snm -ex
On Thursday 18 July 2002 17:24, Oliver Ob wrote:
> I want to find and list all files with *.snm ending.
> find /mnt/c/ -name *.snm -exec ls
> does not work, the man page does tell me french fries.
>
> What am I missing?
You need to tell -exec which file to process. This is done with curly braces:
This does not specifically address your question, but I think this is actually
the answer you wanted:
http://www.linux-tutorial.info/cgi-bin/display.pl?266&0&0&0&3
regards,
jimmo
On Thursday 27 June 2002 01:39, Jim Reimer wrote:
> I have a script run by cron once every half hour which
> gets a
13 matches
Mail list logo
