AFAIK, Windows XP doesn't accept ICMP redirects.
I know that Windows 2000 and NT didn't, so it wouldn't surprise me if XP
didn't. It's not secure... .
Cheers,
Liam
Sanjay Arora wrote:
Netmask is 255.255.255.0 on all machines.
Point is that the WinXP machine is being given a
redirect by the Linu
I reasonably certain everything below is correct,
but don't sue me if it doesn't work. :)
Here is what's causing your problem. Because you
are using IP addresses 192.168.200.??? and also
IPs 192.168.250.???, you need to either use for
netmask 255.255.0.0, or change all your IPs so
they start wit
Sven Schuster wrote:
Hello,
maybe you could try to turn off send_redirects??
echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/send_redirects
echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/send_redirects
Maybe you'll have to write eth0 instead of eth0, depending on
Ouch...sorry, of course I mean eth1 or eth2 or w
Hello,
maybe you could try to turn off send_redirects??
echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/send_redirects
echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/send_redirects
Maybe you'll have to write eth0 instead of eth0, depending on
the interface for the internal network.
Hope this helps
Sven
Sanjay
At 05:20 AM 7/16/2003 -0700, Sanjay Arora wrote:
Netmask is 255.255.255.0 on all machines.
Point is that the WinXP machine is being given a
redirect by the Linux firewall and that is being
ignored, either due to inability of WinXP or some
misconfiguration by me.
[old stuff deleted]
As I said in m
Netmask is 255.255.255.0 on all machines.
Point is that the WinXP machine is being given a
redirect by the Linux firewall and that is being
ignored, either due to inability of WinXP or some
misconfiguration by me.
Sanjay.
--- Stephen Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are the netmasks for
Sanjay Arora wrote:
> Network Scenario: RH 8 Linux Firewall Server using three ethernet cards,
> IPs 172.16.0.141 (connected to Cable Ethernet ISP doing NAT), 192.168.200.1
> connected to an ethernet hub, & 192.168.100.1 (presently not being used).
> Using a hub two lans are connected to 192.1
At 12:11 AM 7/14/2003 +0530, Sanjay Arora wrote:
Network Scenario: RH 8 Linux Firewall Server using three ethernet cards,
IPs 172.16.0.141 (connected to Cable Ethernet ISP doing NAT),
192.168.200.1 connected to an ethernet hub, & 192.168.100.1 (presently not
being used). Using a hub two lans are
Network Scenario: RH 8 Linux Firewall Server using three ethernet cards,
IPs 172.16.0.141 (connected to Cable Ethernet ISP doing NAT), 192.168.200.1
connected to an ethernet hub, & 192.168.100.1 (presently not being used).
Using a hub two lans are connected to 192.168.200.1, each presently havin
