RE: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-16 Thread Ray Olszewski
OK. In the list below, the ones that involve FQDNs are all returning errors tha indicate a DNS problem. If I am right in recalling that you can ping the ISP's DNS server themselves by their addresses, I would suggest you see if removing the on-LAN DNS server from the list in /etc/resolv.conf fix

RE: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-16 Thread frans toruan
# fx > Please tell us the *exact* command you entered and the *exact* # fx > message ping Sorry, truly. These are exact results of ping via RHL : ping 202.134.0.155 -c 1 : PING 202.134.0.155(202.134.0.155) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 202.134.0.155: icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=375 m

Re: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-16 Thread chuck gelm
Comments embedded. frans toruan wrote: # fx > Hi, Frans: # fx > # fx > 10.234.16.101 fxrhl90 workstation's LAN interface # fx > 10.234.16.99 ? gateway's LAN interface # fx > 202.134.0.155 nsjkt1.telkom.net.id gateway's WAN interface # fx > ? # fx > 202.134.2.5 ns2.telkom.net.id a DNS s

RE: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 11:09 AM 2/16/2005 +0700, frans toruan wrote: [...] # fx > Preliminary comment: When asking for technical help, never tell us # fx > what the # fx > response is "something like". Take the time to write it down and tell # fx > us # fx > what it actually is, and the exact command it is response to

RE: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread frans toruan
Many thanks for your comments, # fx > # fx > Does your ISP have its own DNS servers? If so, you might need to use # fx > dhcpcd (some # fx > ISPs require you to use their own DNS servers to reduce network # fx > load.) Yes, 202.134.0.155 and 202.134.2.5 are DNS servers of our ISP. I already inp

RE: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread frans toruan
# fx > Hi, Frans: # fx > # fx > 10.234.16.101fxrhl90 workstation's LAN interface # fx > 10.234.16.99 ? gateway's LAN interface # fx > 202.134.0.155nsjkt1.telkom.net.idgateway's WAN interface # fx > ? # fx > 202.134.2.5 ns2.telkom.n

RE: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread frans toruan
# fx > I don't quite understand this last sentence. The gateway number # fx > should be # fx > the LAN address of your router ... probably 10.234.16.99, based on Yes, you are right. # fx > what you # fx > report below ... not (for example) the public address by which that # fx > router # fx > (pr

Re: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread Ray Olszewski
Comments interspersed. At 03:14 PM 2/15/2005 +0700, GA Dept PT ACBI wrote: I just installed RHL90, as workstation, and connected to our internal LAN. Now, I tried to connect to the net via our ADSL. But failed, via Mozilla browser, sendmail, or any other. The ADSL's IP number as default gateway was

Re: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread chuck gelm
GA Dept PT ACBI wrote: I just installed RHL90, as workstation, and connected to our internal LAN. Now, I tried to connect to the net via our ADSL. But failed, via Mozilla browser, sendmail, or any other. The ADSL's IP number as default gateway was already put into the routing table. I can ping to

Re: ADSL connection via RHL 90

2005-02-15 Thread Jim Nelson
GA Dept PT ACBI wrote: Data from /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth0 : DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=10.234.16.255 IPADDR=10.234.16.101 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=10.234.16.0 ONBOOT=yes HWADDR=00:0c:6e:6b:4e:c2 USERCTL=no PEERDNS=no GATEWAY=10.234.16.99 TYPE=Ethernet Does your IS