At , Heimo Claasen wrote:
[...]
(It's a drag with Debian, where you get the [typically wrong] result
only after the whole installation procedure and after starting X; or
rather, after failing to get somewhere then. And in addition, there are
real nuisances built-in there: the value to enter for vi
That looks to me as if the GUI (KDE in this case) starts up with the
lowest resolution, say 640x480 - does cycling through screen
resolutions (with [CTRL]-[ALT]-[+]) give you any other/larger screen
dimension ? (The pop-up windows should be significantly smaller then,
and be situated all inside the
Greetings James, Steven and Yawar and thanks for your input and
comments.. I'm still struggling with this plus researching my many
notes about X11R6 from months/years back.. I hit the Web for FAQ's,
etc including the Mandrake site and nothing similar yet..
The Desktop is maximized and the problem
On 7 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Try maximizing the dialog box window, if possible. This
> should neatly sidestep the whole issue of ``virtual
> monitors''.
>
> I, also, have encountered the above problem, and have
> attributed it to bad dialog box design. The problem also
> occasional
Hi,
Try maximizing the dialog box window, if possible. This
should neatly sidestep the whole issue of ``virtual
monitors''.
I, also, have encountered the above problem, and have
attributed it to bad dialog box design. The problem also
occasionally plagues Windows dialog boxes, as well. I did
n
On 7 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> James Miller wrote:
> >
> > dragging the mouse cursor to the edge of the screen causes
> > the screen to shift in that direction, making what was cut
> > off at that edge visible (while at the same time cutting
> > things off at the opposite edge).
> > I l
James Miller wrote:
>
> dragging the mouse cursor to the edge of the screen causes
> the screen to shift in that direction, making what was cut
> off at that edge visible (while at the same time cutting
> things off at the opposite edge).
> I like this feature of "virtual resolution", and woul
Hal:
As I understand it, this has something to do with the X Windows feature
known as "virtual resolution." X Windows can, apparently, make a monitor
function at a higher resolution than it's really capable of by making the
actual display actually cover only part of the visible display. In such
ca
