Re: Reg:gcc

2002-06-26 Thread Brian Bilbrey
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 05:26, Sridhar J (june end) wrote: > Doesn't it mean that a.out is in the current directory? So why I should go > to a parent directory as in ./a.out to execute it? Sorry, you're not understanding a couple of things. First, "./" is the *current* directory, not the paren

Re: Reg:gcc

2002-06-26 Thread Gavin Laking
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:56:41 +0530 "Sridhar J (june end)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > Thanks to all of you who replied promptly to my question. I would like to > clarify one thing. When I compiled the program using gcc, I tried typing > a.out. When that didn't work, I did a ls -l whic

Re: Reg:gcc

2002-06-26 Thread Mark Gallagher
Sridhar J (june end) wrote: > Hello > > Thanks to all of you who replied promptly to my question. I would like to > clarify one thing. When I compiled the program using gcc, I tried typing > a.out. When that didn't work, I did a ls -l which showed me a file called > a.out*. > > Doesn't it mean t

Re: Reg:gcc

2002-06-26 Thread Jos Lemmerling
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Sridhar J (june end) wrote: > Thanks to all of you who replied promptly to my question. I would like to > clarify one thing. When I compiled the program using gcc, I tried typing > a.out. When that didn't work, I did a ls -l which showed me a file called > a.out*. > > Doesn'

Reg:gcc

2002-06-26 Thread Sridhar J (june end)
Hello Thanks to all of you who replied promptly to my question. I would like to clarify one thing. When I compiled the program using gcc, I tried typing a.out. When that didn't work, I did a ls -l which showed me a file called a.out*. Doesn't it mean that a.out is in the current directory? So wh