Thanks for the additional information. This is an interesting test, and I'd
really like better to understand what is going on. A few thoughts ...
First, your "order of three times" calculation is inconsistent with the
detail results you report here. The two actual differences are about 1.5
and
On Monday 17 March 2003 20:11, Abhijit Vijay wrote:
> Copy files from Server to Client 402 MB
> (avg file size 58kB)
> Linux => 2.71 MB/sec
> WinXP => 3.42 MB/sec
>
> Copy file from Server to Client 0.99 GB
> (avg file size 86,630 kB)
> Linux => 4.06 MB/sec
> WinXP => 8.49 MB/sec
>
I would make a
--- Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:07 AM 3/17/2003 -0800, Abhijit Vijay wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I came to know from some of my labmates who did a
> >performance test, that Linux Samba access is
> >*significantly* slower (order of three times) than
> >Windows SMB. Is there any re
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Abhijit Vijay wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I came to know from some of my labmates who did a
> performance test, that Linux Samba access is
> *significantly* slower (order of three times) than
> Windows SMB. Is there any reason why this could be tru
> and can this problem be fixed at
At 10:07 AM 3/17/2003 -0800, Abhijit Vijay wrote:
Hi All,
I came to know from some of my labmates who did a
performance test, that Linux Samba access is
*significantly* slower (order of three times) than
Windows SMB. Is there any reason why this could be tru
and can this problem be fixed at all?
I
Hi All,
I came to know from some of my labmates who did a
performance test, that Linux Samba access is
*significantly* slower (order of three times) than
Windows SMB. Is there any reason why this could be tru
and can this problem be fixed at all?
Thanks in Advance,
Abhijit.
_
