Hmm, there are a lot of different things to consider for this. Many
people will give (and probably already have given) you their opinion as
to what is best. Just to add to the confusion, here are my thoughts on
these issues:
The concept of a "backup server" is fairly good. Because disk space is
s
Linux linuxDBA 2.4.18-4GB #1 Wed Mar 27 13:57:05 UTC 2002 i686 unknown
8:30pm up 4 days, 22:17, 2 users, load average: 1.91, 1.96, 1.91
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Paul Kraus wrote:
> There are many different ways to approach backup schemes. I want to put
> in a 120gb Hard Drive in my Linux Serve
On 3 Oct 2002, Paul Kraus wrote:
> ownerships. I am not sure about the space on the UNIX machine. It is
> given in blocks and I don't really understand how blocks translate into
> MB's if someone could explain I would be most appreciative.
>
Does df -h work on Unix, too? That will show you a
There are many different ways to approach backup schemes. I want to put
in a 120gb Hard Drive in my Linux Server and then use it as a backup
server. I have about 15 various windows workstations that I want to be
able to backup there Documents and mail folders (mostly windows 98
machines with a han
