RE: Thought I was mounting drive correctly, but backup failed

2005-03-11 Thread Eve Atley
>Hmmm ... have you created (touch'ed) the file /mnt/backup/connected on the >backup drive? If not, the script is failing to perform the backup because >the conditional in its if statement (if [ -f /mnt/backup/connected ];) >fails. And the script has no instructions for what to do if the if test

RE: Thought I was mounting drive correctly, but backup failed

2005-03-11 Thread Ray Olszewski
I've made several suggestions inline. But skip to the last one first, since it's my best guess about what your actual problem is. At 05:35 PM 3/11/2005 -0500, Eve Atley wrote: Hi Ray, thanks for your usual excellent tips. Here's what I've done... 1. mount -t smbfs -o username=linuxadmin,password=

RE: Thought I was mounting drive correctly, but backup failed

2005-03-11 Thread Eve Atley
Hi Ray, thanks for your usual excellent tips. Here's what I've done... 1. mount -t smbfs -o username=linuxadmin,password=password,workgroup=wowcorp //backup/e /mnt/backup Result: no errors 2. df shows: /dev/hda2 37334192 5252668 30185052 15% / /dev/hda1 101089 2

Re: Thought I was mounting drive correctly, but backup failed

2005-03-11 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 02:20 PM 3/11/2005 -0500, Eve Atley wrote: My setup: 1 Linux RedHat 9 kernel I don't know if this part of the info matters, but identifying a kernel this way is almost useless. More useful is to report the output of "uname -a" and mention if you are using a stock or locally-compiled version of

Thought I was mounting drive correctly, but backup failed

2005-03-11 Thread Eve Atley
My setup: 1 Linux RedHat 9 kernel 1 Windows 2000 backup machine with 2 firewire hot-swap drives attached (named 'backup') - firewire drives have been partitioned and ready to roll - drives are lettered/named, respectively, e/Granite1, and f/Granite2 - linuxadmin/password s