>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Are you sure that 'top' uses that 'exe' ?
> ---
> Not at all...in fact was told it doesn't. Apparently, though,
> the listed permissions on the links are arbitrary and the system
> fairly well igno
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Are you sure that 'top' uses that 'exe' ?
---
Not at all...in fact was told it doesn't. Apparently, though,
the listed permissions on the links are arbitrary and the system
fairly well ignores them.
> I'm misunderstanding something about links in proc.
>
> I thought 'ps', 'top' et al used /proc to display processes, command lines,
> etc.
>
> Since neither ps nor top are suid root, they are running with my uid
> permissions.
>
> However, if I do "ls -l" on /proc//exe, I get a
>
> "ls: canno
I'm misunderstanding something about links in proc.
I thought 'ps', 'top' et al used /proc to display processes, command lines,
etc.
Since neither ps nor top are suid root, they are running with my uid
permissions.
However, if I do "ls -l" on /proc//exe, I get a
"ls: cannot read symbolic link /
