On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:17:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:56:25 +0900 Ryusuke Konishi
> wrote:
>
>> From: Andreas Rohner
>>
>> This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use of
>> msync(), sync() and a clean unmount of the file system. It is easily
>>
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:56:25 +0900 Ryusuke Konishi
wrote:
> From: Andreas Rohner
>
> This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use of
> msync(), sync() and a clean unmount of the file system. It is easily
> reproducible with the following script:
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/nilfs2
From: Andreas Rohner
This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use of
msync(), sync() and a clean unmount of the file system. It is easily
reproducible with the following script:
[BEGIN SCRIPT]
mkfs.nilfs2 -f /dev/sdb
mount /dev/sdb /mnt
dd
On 2014-09-18 09:24, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:34:39 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:16:46 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
>>> On 2014-09-16 15:57, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:38:29 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
>> I'd appre
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:34:39 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:16:46 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
>> On 2014-09-16 15:57, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:38:29 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
> I'd appreciate your help on testing the patch for some old
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:16:46 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
> On 2014-09-16 15:57, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:38:29 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
I'd appreciate your help on testing the patch for some old kernels.
(And, please declare a "Tested-by" tag in the reply mail
On 2014-09-16 15:57, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:38:29 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
>>> I'd appreciate your help on testing the patch for some old kernels.
>>> (And, please declare a "Tested-by" tag in the reply mail, if the test
>>> is ok).
>>
>> Sure I have everything set up.
This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use of
msync(), sync() and a clean unmount of the file system. It is easily
reproducible with the following script:
[BEGIN SCRIPT]
mkfs.nilfs2 -f /dev/sdb
mount /dev/sdb /mnt
# create 30MB testfile
dd
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:38:29 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
>> I'd appreciate your help on testing the patch for some old kernels.
>> (And, please declare a "Tested-by" tag in the reply mail, if the test
>> is ok).
>
> Sure I have everything set up. Which kernels do I have to test? Was
> commit 136e
On 2014-09-16 06:42, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:24:05 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
>> On 2014-09-16 00:01, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:47:30 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:24:05 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
> On 2014-09-16 00:01, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:47:30 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
>>> This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use of
>>> msync(), sync() and a clean unmount of the
On 2014-09-16 00:01, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:47:30 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
>> This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use of
>> msync(), sync() and a clean unmount of the file system. It is easily
>> reproducible with the following scr
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:47:30 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
> This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use of
> msync(), sync() and a clean unmount of the file system. It is easily
> reproducible with the following script:
>
> [BEGIN SCRIPT]---
This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use of
msync(), sync() and a clean unmount of the file system. It is easily
reproducible with the following script:
[BEGIN SCRIPT]
mkfs.nilfs2 -f /dev/sdb
mount /dev/sdb /mnt
# create 30MB testfile
dd
14 matches
Mail list logo