On Tue 04-12-18 22:11:10, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 5:35 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 07:33:43PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:05 PM Dan Williams
> > > wrote:
> > > > > -void dax_unlock_mapping_entry(struct page *page)
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 5:35 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 07:33:43PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:05 PM Dan Williams
> > wrote:
> > > > -void dax_unlock_mapping_entry(struct page *page)
> > > > +void dax_unlock_mapping_entry(struct page *page,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 07:33:43PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:05 PM Dan Williams
> wrote:
> > > -void dax_unlock_mapping_entry(struct page *page)
> > > +void dax_unlock_mapping_entry(struct page *page, dax_entry_t entry)
> >
> > Let's not require the page to be passed
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:05 PM Dan Williams wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:50 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:01:07AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:33 AM Dan Williams
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:24 AM M
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:50 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:01:07AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:33 AM Dan Williams
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:24 AM Matthew Wilcox
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 0
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:01:07AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:33 AM Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:24 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:54:49AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > Looks good to me, although can we mak
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:33 AM Dan Williams wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:24 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:54:49AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > Looks good to me, although can we make that cookie an actual type? I
> > > think it's mostly ok to pass around
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:24 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:54:49AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Looks good to me, although can we make that cookie an actual type? I
> > think it's mostly ok to pass around (void *) for 'entry' inside of
> > fs/dax.c, but once an entry le
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:54:49AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Looks good to me, although can we make that cookie an actual type? I
> think it's mostly ok to pass around (void *) for 'entry' inside of
> fs/dax.c, but once an entry leaves that file I'd like it to have an
> explicit type to catch pe
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:49 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:13:46PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Internal to dax_unlock_mapping_entry(), dax_unlock_entry() is used to
> > store a replacement entry in the Xarray at the given xas-index with the
> > DAX_LOCKED bit clear. Wh
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:13:46PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Internal to dax_unlock_mapping_entry(), dax_unlock_entry() is used to
> store a replacement entry in the Xarray at the given xas-index with the
> DAX_LOCKED bit clear. When called, dax_unlock_entry() expects the unlocked
> value of the
Internal to dax_unlock_mapping_entry(), dax_unlock_entry() is used to
store a replacement entry in the Xarray at the given xas-index with the
DAX_LOCKED bit clear. When called, dax_unlock_entry() expects the unlocked
value of the entry relative to the current Xarray state to be specified.
In most
12 matches
Mail list logo
