On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:49 AM Vishal Verma wrote:
[..]
> I see how it can be replaced now. Here is a revised patch 4 that
> includes thses conversions:
>
> 8<
>
>
> From 5c19c269dd0037c3f68725e0f721784056172433 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vishal Verma
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 18:20:31
On 01/14, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2019-01-14 at 10:17 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:11 AM Vishal Verma <
> > vishal.l.ve...@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > It is possible for ndctl_cmd_submit to return a positive number,
> > > indicating a buffer underrun. It
On Mon, 2019-01-14 at 10:17 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:11 AM Vishal Verma <
> vishal.l.ve...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > It is possible for ndctl_cmd_submit to return a positive number,
> > indicating a buffer underrun. It is only truly an error if it
> > returns a
> >
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:11 AM Vishal Verma wrote:
>
> It is possible for ndctl_cmd_submit to return a positive number,
> indicating a buffer underrun. It is only truly an error if it returns a
> negative number. Several places in the library, the ndctl utility, and
> in test/ were simply checki
It is possible for ndctl_cmd_submit to return a positive number,
indicating a buffer underrun. It is only truly an error if it returns a
negative number. Several places in the library, the ndctl utility, and
in test/ were simply checking for an error with "if (rc)". Fix these to
only error out for
