RE: [PATCH v3 2/5] omap3: pm: Using separate clk/volt setup_time for RET and OFF states

2010-03-19 Thread Lesly Arackal Manuel
Hi Kevin, If my understanding is correct. The clk_setuptime is board specific, depends on the osc/XTAL used onthe board. So the clk_setuptime has to come from the board file. Volt_setuptime & volt_offset is PM IC specific, depends on the PM IC's SMPS characteristics. So this can be updated f

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] DSS2: OMAPFB: Add support for switching memory regions

2010-03-19 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Syrjala Ville (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: > [...] > > > Just tried it and seems to be mostly OK. We get lockdep checking as a > > > bonus. It didn't like setup_plane taking the same rwsem twice so I > > > added a check to see if the old and new regions are t

Re: [PATCH] arm: Replace CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG with HWCAP_TLS and check for it on V6

2010-03-19 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:35:21PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > -#if defined(CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG) > - mcr p15, 0, r3, c13, c0, 3 @ set TLS register > -#elif !defined(CONFIG_TLS_REG_EMUL) > - mov r4, #0x0fff > - str r3, [r4, #-15] @ TLS val at 0x

Re: [PATCH] arm: Replace CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG with HWCAP_TLS and check for it on V6

2010-03-19 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:46:45AM +, Jamie Lokier wrote: > I'm thinking, why not an alternative() macro like on x86, which is a > very nice way to describe run-time patches of one or a few instructions > which depend on arch feature bits. Having XIP support prevents that kind of thing. -- To

Re: [PATCH v2] [I2C-OMAP] Add support for 16-bit registers

2010-03-19 Thread Jarkko Nikula
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:30:00 -0800 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Kevin Hilman [100310 10:01]: > > Tony Lindgren writes: > > ... > > Unfortunately, Tony's additional fix did not make it into the version > > that was merged to mainline, which results in a crash during > > probe when using v2.6.34-rc1

[Resubmit: PATCH-V2] AM3517: Add VPFE Capture driver support

2010-03-19 Thread hvaibhav
From: Vaibhav Hiremath AM3517 and DM644x uses same CCDC IP, so reusing the driver for AM3517. Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-am3517evm.c | 160 + 1 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2

[Resubmit: PATCH-V6 0/2] OMAP3: Add V4L2 display driver support

2010-03-19 Thread hvaibhav
From: Vaibhav Hiremath Refreshed on top of latest linuxtv/master repository and resubmitting the patch series again. Please note that this patch is dependent on patch which add "ti-media" directory (submitted earlier to this patch series). Vaibhav Hiremath (2): OMAP2/3 V4L2: Add support for O

[Resubmit: PATCH-V6 2/2] OMAP2/3: Add V4L2 DSS driver support in device.c

2010-03-19 Thread hvaibhav
From: Vaibhav Hiremath Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 28 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c index 18ad931..83c92cd 100644 --- a/arch/a

RE: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 3/4] omap: pm: opp: add ability to store data per opp

2010-03-19 Thread Cousson, Benoit
Hi Nishanth, >From: Menon, Nishanth >Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:45 PM > >Many modules seem to need some sort of flexible storage mechanism >which is corresponds to a specific opp. To cater to this need, we >provide store, restore and removal apis. Do we really need that level of flexibility

[RFC] omap3: Fix incorrect restore pointer

2010-03-19 Thread Sanjeev Premi
Due to check for absolute omap_rev() values against ES3.0 and ES3.1, the restore pointer for OMAP3630 is incorrectly assigned. The problem may be observed with OMAP3430 ES3.1.1 as well. Submitting this as RFC because I have only compiled with changes. Haven't yet tried on EVM. Will submit formal

RE: kernel panic with latest DSS

2010-03-19 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
> -Original Message- > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tomi Valkeinen > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 4:22 PM > To: ext Steve Sakoman > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: kernel panic with latest DSS > > Can you tr

[PATCH] OMAP3: PM: Fix compilation error observed when cpufreq is disabled

2010-03-19 Thread Ranjith Lohithakshan
Currently on PM branch, compilation fails when cpufreq is disabled arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock3xxx_data.c: In function 'omap3xxx_clk_init': arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock3xxx_data.c:3563: error: 'struct clk_functions' has no member named 'clk_init_cpufreq_table' arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock3xxx_data.c:3564:

RE: kernel panic with latest DSS

2010-03-19 Thread tomi . valkeinen
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, ext Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: -Original Message- From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tomi Valkeinen Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 4:22 PM To: ext Steve Sakoman Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ke

RE: kernel panic with latest DSS

2010-03-19 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
> -Original Message- > From: tomi.valkei...@nokia.com [mailto:tomi.valkei...@nokia.com] > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 4:41 PM > To: Hiremath, Vaibhav > Cc: Valkeinen Tomi (Nokia-D/Helsinki); ext Steve Sakoman; linux- > o...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: RE: kernel panic with latest DSS > >

[PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM: Replace vdvi regulator supply with vdds_dsi

2010-03-19 Thread hvaibhav
From: Vaibhav Hiremath With recent changes happened in OMAP2/3 DSS library for regulator interface, it is required to define DSI regulator supply, without this DSS (in turn Fbdev) fails to get regulator. Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath Acked-by: Tomi Valkeinen --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-om

RE: kernel panic with latest DSS

2010-03-19 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
> -Original Message- > From: Hiremath, Vaibhav > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 4:45 PM > To: 'tomi.valkei...@nokia.com' > Cc: ext Steve Sakoman; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Subject: RE: kernel panic with latest DSS > > > > -Original Message- > > From: tomi.valkei...@nokia.com [mai

Re: [PATCHv6 2/2][RESEND] ASoC: TWL6040: Add twl6040 codec driver

2010-03-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:38:56PM -0500, Olaya, Margarita wrote: > Please find attached the patch. I'm working to fix the issues with the > MUA. Applied now, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org Mor

Re: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDGE: DSP recovery feature

2010-03-19 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando wrote: > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/dspbridge/drv.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/dspbridge/drv.h > @@ -389,4 +389,7 @@ extern u32 drv_request_resources(u32 dw_context, u32 > *pDevNodeString); >  */ >  extern u32 drv_release_resour

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] DSS2: OMAPFB: Add support for switching memory regions

2010-03-19 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:46:04AM +0100, Deak Imre (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Syrjala Ville (Nokia-D/Helsinki) > wrote: > > [...] > > > > Just tried it and seems to be mostly OK. We get lockdep checking as a > > > > bonus. It didn't like setup_plane taki

RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] OMAP3: SDRC: Dynamic Calculation of SDRC stall latency during DVFS

2010-03-19 Thread Sripathy, Vishwanath
> -Original Message- > From: K, Ambresh > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:46 PM > To: Gurav , Pramod > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Reddy, Teerth; Sripathy, Vishwanath > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] OMAP3: SDRC: Dynamic Calculation of SDRC stall > latency during DVFS > > Gurav , Pram

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] OMAP3630 SDRC: Change in DVFS Latency Formula for OMAP3630

2010-03-19 Thread Sripathy, Vishwanath
> -Original Message- > From: K, Ambresh > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:48 PM > To: Gurav , Pramod > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Sripathy, Vishwanath > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] OMAP3630 SDRC: Change in DVFS Latency Formula for > OMAP3630 > > Gurav , Pramod wrote: > > This patc

[PATCH] omap: fix clocksource_32k to start from zero

2010-03-19 Thread Aaro Koskinen
When the 32k sync timer is used for sched_clock(), it should count time from the kernel boot (clocksource init) instead of the last HW reset. Otherwise printk.time values will jump suddenly during the boot: [0.00] calling omap2_clk_arch_init+0x0/0x138 @ 1 [0.00] in

RE: kernel panic with latest DSS

2010-03-19 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
> -Original Message- > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tomi Valkeinen > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 4:22 PM > To: ext Steve Sakoman > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: kernel panic with latest DSS > > Can you tr

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup

2010-03-19 Thread Nishanth Menon
Kevin Hilman had written, on 03/18/2010 05:49 PM, the following: Nishanth Menon writes: BUG_ON should not ideally contain a functional code. Remove it out. True. But this code should not be using BUG_ON() in the first place. We should not crash the whole kernel in this case, just fail with

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 3/4] omap: pm: opp: add ability to store data per opp

2010-03-19 Thread Nishanth Menon
Cousson, Benoit had written, on 03/19/2010 05:14 AM, the following: Hi Nishanth, From: Menon, Nishanth Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:45 PM Many modules seem to need some sort of flexible storage mechanism which is corresponds to a specific opp. To cater to this need, we provide store, resto

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 3/4] omap: pm: opp: add ability to store data per opp

2010-03-19 Thread Felipe Balbi
hi, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 07:44:50PM +0100, ext Nishanth Menon wrote: +int opp_store_data(struct omap_opp *opp, char *name, void *data) +{ + return -EINVAL; Would -ENODATA fit better ?? diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/opp.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/opp.c index bb8120e..15f6f7c 100644 ---

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 4/4] omap3: srf: remove hardcoded opp dependency

2010-03-19 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 07:44:51PM +0100, ext Nishanth Menon wrote: @@ -131,5 +133,16 @@ void __init omap3_pm_init_opp_table(void) r |= opp_init_list(OPP_L3, omap3_opp_def_list[1]); r |= opp_init_list(OPP_DSP, omap3_opp_def_list[2]); BUG_ON(r); + + /* First get the l

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup

2010-03-19 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:21:34PM +0100, ext Nishanth Menon wrote: Kevin Hilman had written, on 03/18/2010 05:49 PM, the following: Nishanth Menon writes: BUG_ON should not ideally contain a functional code. Remove it out. True. But this code should not be using BUG_ON() in the first plac

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 3/4] omap: pm: opp: add ability to store data per opp

2010-03-19 Thread Nishanth Menon
Felipe Balbi had written, on 03/19/2010 09:43 AM, the following: hi, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 07:44:50PM +0100, ext Nishanth Menon wrote: +int opp_store_data(struct omap_opp *opp, char *name, void *data) +{ + return -EINVAL; Would -ENODATA fit better ?? wondered later on if 0 is better h

Re: [PATCH] arm: Replace CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG with HWCAP_TLS and check for it on V6

2010-03-19 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Russell King - ARM Linux [100319 01:50]: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:46:45AM +, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > I'm thinking, why not an alternative() macro like on x86, which is a > > very nice way to describe run-time patches of one or a few instructions > > which depend on arch feature bits. >

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 4/4] omap3: srf: remove hardcoded opp dependency

2010-03-19 Thread Nishanth Menon
Felipe Balbi had written, on 03/19/2010 09:47 AM, the following: On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 07:44:51PM +0100, ext Nishanth Menon wrote: @@ -131,5 +133,16 @@ void __init omap3_pm_init_opp_table(void) r |= opp_init_list(OPP_L3, omap3_opp_def_list[1]); r |= opp_init_list(OPP_DSP, omap3

Re: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDGE: DSP recovery feature

2010-03-19 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > I tried to rebase this patch on top of the latest head and the > user-space client never gets notified of the MMUFAULT. After manually > killing the process, the DSP is restarted correctly though. Strike that. MMUFAULTS are not notified e

Re: [PATCH] arm: Replace CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG with HWCAP_TLS and check for it on V6

2010-03-19 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Russell King - ARM Linux [100319 01:49]: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:35:21PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > -#if defined(CONFIG_HAS_TLS_REG) > > - mcr p15, 0, r3, c13, c0, 3 @ set TLS register > > -#elif !defined(CONFIG_TLS_REG_EMUL) > > - mov r4, #0x0fff > > - str

RE: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDGE: DSP recovery feature

2010-03-19 Thread Hebbar, Shivananda
> -Original Message- > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Felipe > Contreras > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 10:54 AM > To: Guzman Lugo, Fernando > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Hiroshi DOYU; Ameya Palande; > felipe.contre...@

RE: [PATCH] omap4: Fix build break when used with gcc-4.4.1 (2009-q3)

2010-03-19 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
Tony, > -Original Message- > From: Shilimkar, Santosh > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:16 AM > To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Woodruff, Richard; Shilimkar, Santosh > Subject: [PATCH] omap4: Fix build break when used with gcc-4.4.1 (2009-q3) > > From: Richard Woodruff > > This p

Re: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDGE: DSP recovery feature

2010-03-19 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Hebbar, Shivananda wrote: > Client app must register for MMUFault/DSPSysError events. Then only > You will receive notifications. It is registered, and it was receiving notifications on old versions of the bridge... not any more. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubs

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] omap3: pm: fix for twl4030 script load

2010-03-19 Thread Kevin Hilman
"Lesly Arackal Manuel" writes: [...] > Please fix the changelog to not only summarize *what* is being changed, > but *why*. > > [Lesly] Why the order is not important. > Since each seq is independent and not falling trough any other seq. > Only thing we have to do is program the start address of

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] omap3: pm: Using separate clk/volt setup_time for RET and OFF states

2010-03-19 Thread Kevin Hilman
Please don't top post: http://www.elinux.org/Netiquette "Lesly Arackal Manuel" writes: > Hi Kevin, > > If my understanding is correct. > > The clk_setuptime is board specific, depends on the osc/XTAL used on the > board. So the clk_setuptime has to come from the board file. > > Volt_setuptime &

Re: [PATCH] omap: fix clocksource_32k to start from zero

2010-03-19 Thread Kevin Hilman
Aaro Koskinen writes: > When the 32k sync timer is used for sched_clock(), it should count > time from the kernel boot (clocksource init) instead of the last HW > reset. Otherwise printk.time values will jump suddenly during the boot: > > [0.00] calling omap2_clk_arch_init+0x0/0x13

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup

2010-03-19 Thread Kevin Hilman
Nishanth Menon writes: > Kevin Hilman had written, on 03/18/2010 05:49 PM, the following: >> Nishanth Menon writes: >> >>> BUG_ON should not ideally contain a functional code. Remove it out. >> >> True. But this code should not be using BUG_ON() in the first place. >> >> We should not crash the

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 3/4] omap: pm: opp: add ability to store data per opp

2010-03-19 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:25:18AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Now, based on your proposal as I understand, > struct omap2_data { > blah_o21 > blah_o22 > }; > > struct omap3_data { > blah_o31 > blah_o32 > blah_o33 > } > > struct omap4_data { > blah_o41 > blah_o42 > blah_o31 > blah_o32 > }

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup

2010-03-19 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:46:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > IMO, Using BUG* macros usually indicates improper or incomplete error > handling rather than a real catastrophic system failure. on the other hand a kernel oops and system hang will always get noted. Rather than a WARN() which simply

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 3/4] omap: pm: opp: add ability to store data per opp

2010-03-19 Thread Nishanth Menon
Felipe Balbi had written, on 03/19/2010 12:47 PM, the following: [...] now in the approach I took, you could have: struct sr_ntarget_type{ unsigned long nTarget; something else if needed } And in SR driver, the module doesnot need to care which silicon it is running on.. it jus

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup

2010-03-19 Thread Kevin Hilman
Felipe Balbi writes: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:46:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> IMO, Using BUG* macros usually indicates improper or incomplete error >> handling rather than a real catastrophic system failure. > > on the other hand a kernel oops and system hang will always get > noted. Ra

Re: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDGE: DSP recovery feature

2010-03-19 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Hebbar, Shivananda wrote: >> Client app must register for MMUFault/DSPSysError events. Then only >> You will receive notifications. > > It is registered, and it was receiving notifications on old versions

Re: [PATCH 2/6 Revised] SPI omap2_mcspi: Add max_clk_div field to mcspi platform config

2010-03-19 Thread Scott Ellis
> Only 3430 and 3630 TRMs says 0xd, 0xe, 0xf = Division not supported. > I tested a 3503 with clock divider values of 0x0d, 0x0e and 0x0f. It worked fine. I collected data off the SPI bus successfully at the expected frequencies of 5859 Hz, 2929 Hz and 1464 Hz. > But then again, the TRMs can have

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup

2010-03-19 Thread Nishanth Menon
Kevin Hilman had written, on 03/19/2010 01:42 PM, the following: Felipe Balbi writes: On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:46:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: IMO, Using BUG* macros usually indicates improper or incomplete error handling rather than a real catastrophic system failure. on the other hand

Re: [PATCH 2/6 Revised] SPI omap2_mcspi: Add max_clk_div field to mcspi platform config

2010-03-19 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Scott Ellis [100319 12:43]: > > Only 3430 and 3630 TRMs says 0xd, 0xe, 0xf = Division not supported. > > > I tested a 3503 with clock divider values of 0x0d, 0x0e and 0x0f. > It worked fine. > I collected data off the SPI bus successfully at the expected > frequencies of 5859 Hz, 2929 Hz and 14

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup

2010-03-19 Thread Kevin Hilman
Nishanth Menon writes: > Kevin Hilman had written, on 03/19/2010 01:42 PM, the following: >> Felipe Balbi writes: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:46:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: IMO, Using BUG* macros usually indicates improper or incomplete error handling rather than a real catas

RE: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDGE: DSP recovery feature

2010-03-19 Thread Guzman Lugo, Fernando
>-Original Message- >From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:felipe.contre...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:00 PM >To: Hebbar, Shivananda >Cc: Guzman Lugo, Fernando; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Hiroshi DOYU; Ameya >Palande; felipe.contre...@nokia.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDG

Re: [PM-WIP-OPP][PATCH 1/4] omap3: pm: cpufreq: BUG_ON cleanup

2010-03-19 Thread Nishanth Menon
Kevin Hilman had written, on 03/19/2010 03:49 PM, the following: Nishanth Menon writes: Kevin Hilman had written, on 03/19/2010 01:42 PM, the following: Felipe Balbi writes: On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:46:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: IMO, Using BUG* macros usually indicates improper or

Re: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDGE: DSP recovery feature

2010-03-19 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando wrote: > Do you mean applying DSP recovery process you are no able to receive MMUFault > notifications? > > I am going to check that case. Is there any possibility that the process is > stuck waiting other event? I think mgr_wait_for_bridg

RE: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDGE: DSP recovery feature

2010-03-19 Thread Guzman Lugo, Fernando
>-Original Message- >From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:felipe.contre...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 4:11 PM >To: Guzman Lugo, Fernando >Cc: Hebbar, Shivananda; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Hiroshi DOYU; Ameya >Palande; felipe.contre...@nokia.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] DSPBRIDG

[PATCH] arm: Fix DEBUG_LL for omap zoom2/3

2010-03-19 Thread Tony Lindgren
Hi all, Got a zoom3 finally! This is needed to boot with DEBUG_LL + earlyprintk. Regards, Tony >From d1fa6f3fbc46546f3ade9026dcba80d6fd5bd6bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tony Lindgren Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:18:45 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] arm: Fix DEBUG_LL for omap zoom2/3 Zoom2 and 3 have

Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix DEBUG_LL for omap zoom2/3

2010-03-19 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren [100319 17:30]: > Hi all, > > Got a zoom3 finally! This is needed to boot with DEBUG_LL + earlyprintk. And of course it won't compile because of a missing #. Here's the working version. Tony >From d1d25009c085a2ea677da6bc2c905fbcf98e224e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tony Lindg

Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix DEBUG_LL for omap zoom2/3

2010-03-19 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren [100319 17:42]: > * Tony Lindgren [100319 17:30]: > > Hi all, > > > > Got a zoom3 finally! This is needed to boot with DEBUG_LL + earlyprintk. > > And of course it won't compile because of a missing #. > Here's the working version. One more time. Looks like what I posted is not

Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix DEBUG_LL for omap zoom2/3

2010-03-19 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren [100319 19:43]: > * Tony Lindgren [100319 17:42]: > > * Tony Lindgren [100319 17:30]: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Got a zoom3 finally! This is needed to boot with DEBUG_LL + earlyprintk. > > > > And of course it won't compile because of a missing #. > > Here's the working version