[removed that bouncing email address we had all along :]
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Why would we need platform-specific function pointers here ? I'm not
sure I'm following this one.
So that board code (built-in) does not call the
Hi,
I'm using the following wl127xx.git branch, and trying to bringup my
board using the kernel drivers for wl1271 wlan module with a beagleboard design.
I haven't yet applied luca's patches, and thought I'd try with seeing if the
built drivers are loading properly.
I get the
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 08:30 +0200, ext Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the following wl127xx.git branch, and trying to bringup my
board using the kernel drivers for wl1271 wlan module with a beagleboard
design.
I haven't yet applied luca's patches, and thought I'd try with
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Let's take the i2c-omap for example.
It sounds like it must have a predefined hwspinlock, but what if:
1. It will use omap_hwspinlock_request() to dynamically allocate
a hwspinlock
2. Obviously, the hwspinlock id number must be communicated to
the
Tomi can you queue this? This has been tested by multiple people now,
also see here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=128759415821646w=2
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Stanley.Miao stanley.m...@windriver.com wrote:
If we blank the panel by
echo 1 /sys/devices/platform/omapfb/graphics/fb0/blank
On Thursday 21 October 2010, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
This sounds like adding a set of API that resembles spin_{unlock,lock}_irq.
My gut feeling here is that while this may be useful and simple at
certain places, it is somewhat error prone; a driver which would
erroneously use this at the wrong
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:22:17AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Users would not need to care... if they enable USB and USB_GADGET, it
will be selected automatically for OMAP3, which is what users would
expect.
wouldn't a
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Kamoolkar, Mugdha mug...@ti.com wrote:
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Yes, that would indeed simplify things.
Balaji, Nishant, are you OK with this ?
The problem with this approach is that the i2c driver would have to
sync up on the shared memory
-Original Message-
From: linux-fbdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-fbdev-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Grazvydas Ignotas
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 2:32 PM
To: tomi.valkei...@nokia.com
Cc: Stanley.Miao; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; bryan...@canonical.com;
: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Cc: Ajay Kumar Gupta ajay.gu...@ti.com
Cc: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@suse.de
---
Build break observed with linux-next as of 20101021.
Greg, okay with me to fold this into the original patch
if the others in copy agree. It's a trivial
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:10 PM
To: Shilimkar, Santosh
Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Paul Walmsley; Cousson,
Benoit
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: hmwod: Update the sysc_cache in case
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Thursday 21 October 2010, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
This sounds like adding a set of API that resembles spin_{unlock,lock}_irq.
My gut feeling here is that while this may be useful and simple at
certain places, it is somewhat
From: Bernard Blackham bern...@largestprime.net
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:16:39 +1100
The smsc95xx driver currently generates a new random MAC address
every time the interface is brought up. This makes it impossible to
override using the standard `ifconfig hw ether` approach.
Past patches
hi,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 04:04:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
wouldn't a user expect USB to be enabled if the board _has_ a USB
connector ?
Not if it's not going to be used.
and how would you know before hand if it's going to be used or not ?
1) Do you think all the OMAP3 boards
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 04:20:06AM -0500, Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
Patch usb-am35x-add-musb-support.patch in greg's USB queue
adds backan include of plat/control.h. This file was renamed
by another commit in the omap tree and the file was already
fixed to reflect this.
Remove this include to fix
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 04:04:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
wouldn't a user expect USB to be enabled if the board _has_ a USB
connector ?
Not if it's not going to be used.
and how would you know before hand if
On Thursday 21 October 2010, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
The change is also pretty trivial:
* move the internal locking implementation to raw_ methods
* the raw_ methods would save the current interrupt state only if
given a placeholder
* wrap those raw_ methods with the desired API (but only
Mugdha,
This does not require any smart IPC and it will allow us to get
rid of
the omap_hwspinlock_request_specific() API and its early-callers
requirement.
Yes, that would indeed simplify things.
Balaji, Nishant, are you OK with this ?
The problem with this approach is
From: Erik Gilling konk...@android.com
NEC WVGA LCD NL8048HL11-01B panel support has been added.
This panel is being used in zoom2/zoom3/3630 sdp boards.
Signed-off-by: Mukund Mittal mmit...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Rajkumar N rajkumar.nagara...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Samreen samr...@ti.com
CC:
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 04:52 +0200, ext stanley.miao wrote:
Hi, Tomi,
Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
snip
Otherwise this looks fine, except that panel-taal.c does not need
modifications, as it already handles this case.
I will send a V3 to remove the panel-taal.c part.
Also, at
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 11:02 +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
Tomi can you queue this? This has been tested by multiple people now,
also see here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=128759415821646w=2
Yes, I seem to have missed/forgotten this. I'll add it to my tree.
Tomi
--
To unsubscribe
Hi,
On 10/20/2010 05:38 PM, ext Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Roger Quadrosroger.quad...@nokia.com wrote:
On 10/20/2010 12:23 PM, ext Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Roger Quadrosroger.quad...@nokia.com
wrote:
USB_G_NOKIA just needs a
On 10/21/2010 12:13 PM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
snip
Hi Kevin,
What the patch does is reprogram's the sysc value (from the cache)
whenever its lost. So its infact saved in the cache and restored when
needed.
Otherwise, all this patch does is refresh the _sysc_cache with
completely unknown
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:07:59AM -0500, Roger Quadros wrote:
But I'm not sure that omap_udc is used only for OMAP1 architecture.
Dave/Tony should confirm this.
Maybe the old omap2420_h4 board still uses it, but from 2430 I think the
ip isn't even there anymore.
--
balbi
--
To
* Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com [101021 08:32]:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:07:59AM -0500, Roger Quadros wrote:
But I'm not sure that omap_udc is used only for OMAP1 architecture.
Dave/Tony should confirm this.
Maybe the old omap2420_h4 board still uses it, but from 2430 I think the
ip
* Gadiyar, Anand gadi...@ti.com [101019 23:21]:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Gadiyar, Anand gadi...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [101019 15:48]:
* Gadiyar, Anand gadi...@ti.com [101019 11:26]:
On
Nayak, Rajendra rna...@ti.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:10 PM
To: Shilimkar, Santosh
Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Paul Walmsley; Cousson,
Benoit
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP:
Sripathy, Vishwanath vishwanath...@ti.com writes:
During the early part of the CPUidle path (state selection by the
governer, checking for device activity, etc.) there is no (good)
reason to have interrupts disabled.
Therefore, enable interrupts early in the CPUidle path and then
trigger
[updated version of the patch, fixing issues raised by Vishwa]
From 1661b0f7ad614d221f90eed590040f2cca01c265 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:54:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP3: CPUidle: trigger early idle notification call chain
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
Trivial patch removing clock framework and adding
pm_runtime API.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Minor nit: the runtime PM 'put' calls do not need to be the _sync
versions. You can easily get by using the normal (async) versions
here.
Kevin
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
Add 32k timer hwmod to the database.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Not sure how this is working correctly on OMAP2 and OMAP3. All the
hwmods are mising the oh-prcm.omap2.module_offs field.
Without this, _wait_target_ready *should* fail, and the
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
Converted 32k-sync timer to platform_driver
and now using pm_runtime and hwmod.
Tested on 3430 by me and 4430 by Tarun
If someone could test on 2430 and 2420, I would
be really glad.
Hey, don't you have a 2420 device. There were some cool 2420-based
to fix up a build break.
Signed-off-by: Anand Gadiyar gadi...@ti.com
Cc: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Cc: Ajay Kumar Gupta ajay.gu...@ti.com
Cc: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@suse.de
---
Build break observed with linux-next as of 20101021.
Greg, okay with me
Hi Hari,
On Thursday, October 14, 2010 9:13 PM Kanigeri, Hari wrote:
Schedule the Tasklet to send only when mailbox fifo is full, else
send the message in the Process context. This would avoid
needless scheduling of Tasklet for every message transfer
Signed-off-by: Hari Kanigeri
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:46:11PM -0500, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
Trivial patch removing clock framework and adding
pm_runtime API.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Minor nit: the runtime PM 'put' calls do not need to be the _sync
versions. You can
If one does the following line twice with the old code:
omap_mux_init_signal(uart3_rts_sd.gpio_164, OMAP_PIN_INPUT);
omap_mux_init_signal(uart3_rts_sd.gpio_164, OMAP_PIN_INPUT);
the compiler optimizes the two const strings into one string
internally in the compiler. The old code would modify
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:57:41PM -0500, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
Add 32k timer hwmod to the database.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Not sure how this is working correctly on OMAP2 and OMAP3. All the
hwmods are mising the oh-prcm.omap2.module_offs
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:00:19PM -0500, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
Converted 32k-sync timer to platform_driver
and now using pm_runtime and hwmod.
Tested on 3430 by me and 4430 by Tarun
If someone could test on 2430 and 2420, I would
be really glad.
Hey, don't
On 10/21/10 13:50, Tim Nordell wrote:
If one does the following line twice with the old code:
omap_mux_init_signal(uart3_rts_sd.gpio_164, OMAP_PIN_INPUT);
omap_mux_init_signal(uart3_rts_sd.gpio_164, OMAP_PIN_INPUT);
the compiler optimizes the two const strings into one string
internally in
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:46:11PM -0500, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
Trivial patch removing clock framework and adding
pm_runtime API.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Minor nit: the runtime PM 'put' calls do not need to
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:57:41PM -0500, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
Add 32k timer hwmod to the database.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Not sure how this is working correctly on OMAP2 and OMAP3. All the
hwmods are
Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com writes:
Add 32k timer hwmod to the database.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
---
Looking closer at this patch, there are some other problems...
[...]
+static struct omap_hwmod omap2420_counter_32k_hwmod = {
+ .name = counter_32k,
+
Rene,
Thanks for your comment.
@@ -92,20 +92,25 @@ int omap_mbox_msg_send(struct omap_mbox *mbox,
mbox_msg_t msg) struct omap_mbox_queue *mq = mbox-txq;
int ret = 0, len;
- spin_lock(mq-lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(mq-lock);
Please check if this scenario looks valid to
Hari,
On Thursday, October 21, 2010 3:49 PM Hari Kanigeri wrote:
Rene,
Thanks for your comment.
@@ -92,20 +92,25 @@ int omap_mbox_msg_send(struct omap_mbox *mbox,
mbox_msg_t msg) struct omap_mbox_queue *mq = mbox-txq;
int ret = 0, len;
- spin_lock(mq-lock);
+
Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Samreen samr...@ti.com wrote:
From: Erik Gilling konk...@android.com
NEC WVGA LCD NL8048HL11-01B panel support has been added.
This panel is being used in zoom2/zoom3/3630 sdp boards.
snip
diff --git
45 matches
Mail list logo
