On 02/07/14 18:25, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> In this case board code should take care of setting up the interrupt
> properly and the driver should simply use 0 as flags in request_irq().
> By the way, doesn't generic DT infrastructure already allow specifying
> interrupt triggers and sets them up pr
On 02/07/14 11:49, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 July 2014 09:44 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On the Tegra systems I have, IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING is the correct (or at
>> least a valid) choice. That's probably because the Atmel IRQ signal is
>> routed to our GPIO controller, which is also an IRQ
