Hi,
Sorry for the long delay on replying to this one.
* Wang Sawsd-A24013 cqw...@motorola.com [090602 02:25]:
This patch adds irq_enable and irq_disable for OMAP GPIO IRQ chip, and
also only enable WAKEUPEN
When GPIO edge detection is enabled, also clear the gpio event
triggering
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
Hi,
Sorry for the long delay on replying to this one.
Tony, this one has been superceded, and the irq_enable/disable stuff no
longer is needed due to the patch
OMAP: GPIO: clear/restore level/edge detect settings on mask/unmask
from my PM fixes
* Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com [090805 17:36]:
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
Hi,
Sorry for the long delay on replying to this one.
Tony, this one has been superceded, and the irq_enable/disable stuff no
longer is needed due to the patch
OMAP: GPIO:
Could you try this patch with your TS GPIO configured as
level-triggered?
Kevin
I tried the below patch, it can solve the issue also.
commit f8eb69a2edd684c9e0b72bc3c84c6af9718bd4a4
Author: Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com
Date: Thu Jun 4 15:57:10 2009 -0700
OMAP:
Wang Sawsd-A24013 cqw...@motorola.com writes:
Could you try this patch with your TS GPIO configured as
level-triggered?
I tried the below patch, it can solve the issue also.
Thanks for testing.
This whole time, you're probably wondering... why doesn't Kevin just
add the disable and
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: 2009年6月6日 5:35
To: Wang Sawsd-A24013
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; n...@ti.com; Mike Chan
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP2/3 Avoid GPIO pending irq status
been set after irq_disable
Wang Sawsd-A24013
Wang Sawsd-A24013 cqw...@motorola.com writes:
Kevin,
See below for more comments/explanations:
I still think there at least a couple different problems going on and
I think you are addressing some symptoms but not the root cause.
I understand that combine these two changes in one patch
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: 2009年6月5日 1:04
Dumb question: Why use level? Why not use falling edge for this?
A good question, :-) We did use edge interrupt before, see the reason below.
The issue is, after the touch driver
-Original Message-
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Wang
Sawsd-A24013
Sent: 2009年6月5日 1:43
To: Kevin Hilman
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; n...@ti.com; Mike Chan
Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP2/3 Avoid GPIO pending irq
Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP2/3 Avoid GPIO pending irq status
been set after irq_disable
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: 2009年6月5日 1:04
Dumb question: Why use level? Why not use falling edge for this?
A good question, :-) We
What do you think about disabling the level/edge detection when
disable_irq_wake() is called instead? This seems more logical
and expected.
Kevin, if we look at the current code, enable_irq_wake and
disable_irq_wake
Does not even touch any GPIO WAKEEN register, it seems it is intended
To
Wang Sawsd-A24013 cqw...@motorola.com writes:
What do you think about disabling the level/edge detection when
disable_irq_wake() is called instead? This seems more logical
and expected.
Kevin, if we look at the current code, enable_irq_wake and
disable_irq_wake Does not even touch any
Kevin,
See below for more comments/explanations:
I still think there at least a couple different problems going on and
I think you are addressing some symptoms but not the root cause.
I understand that combine these two changes in one patch may cause
Some confusion, so this time I separate
Wang Sawsd-A24013 cqw...@motorola.com writes:
Resend because of the content format issues in last mail---sorry for
inconvenience.
This version is line-wrapped and otherwise confusing as well so does
not apply cleanly. Could you try using 'git format-patch' to generate
your patch? It looks
Wang Sawsd-A24013 cqw...@motorola.com writes:
Resend because of the content format issues in last mail---sorry for
inconvenience.
This version is line-wrapped and otherwise confusing as well so does
not apply cleanly. Could you try using 'git format-patch' to generate
your patch? It
Wang Sawsd-A24013 cqw...@motorola.com writes:
Wang Sawsd-A24013 cqw...@motorola.com writes:
Resend because of the content format issues in last mail---sorry for
inconvenience.
This version is line-wrapped and otherwise confusing as well so does
not apply cleanly. Could you try using
This patch adds irq_enable and irq_disable for OMAP GPIO IRQ chip, and
also only enable WAKEUPEN
When GPIO edge detection is enabled, also clear the gpio event
triggering configurations to avoid
Pending interrupt status which is generated regardless of the IRQEN and
WKUPEN bit, the pending
IRQ
Resend because of the content format issues in last mail---sorry for
inconvenience.
This patch adds irq_enable and irq_disable for OMAP GPIO IRQ chip, and
also only enable WAKEUPEN When GPIO edge detection is enabled,
also clear the gpio event triggering configurations to avoid Pending
interrupt
18 matches
Mail list logo
