From: Colin Foe-Parker
Set tps65217 PMIC status to OFF if power enable toggle is
supported. Also adds platform data flag, which should be
passed from board init data.
Signed-off-by: Colin Foe-Parker
[anilku...@ti.com: move the additions to tps65217 MFD driver]
Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch
---
+ Mark
On 11/05/2012 10:42 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> From: Colin Foe-Parker
>
> Set tps65217 PMIC status to OFF if power enable toggle is
> supported. Also adds platform data flag, which should be
> passed from board init data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Foe-Parker
> [anilku...@ti.com: move the
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 22:29:36, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> + Mark
>
> On 11/05/2012 10:42 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > From: Colin Foe-Parker
> >
> > Set tps65217 PMIC status to OFF if power enable toggle is
> > supported. Also adds platform data flag, which should be
> > passed from board init d
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:59:36PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 10:42 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- ti,pmic-shutdown-controller: Telling the PMIC to shutdown on PWR_EN
> > toggle.
> That sounds like a generic functionality to me. Don't we have some more
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:53:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:59:36PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> > On 11/05/2012 10:42 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
>
> > > +Optional properties:
> > > +- ti,pmic-shutdown-controller: Telling the PMIC to shutdown on PWR_EN
> > > toggle.
>
> > Tha
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:40:18, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:53:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:59:36PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> > > On 11/05/2012 10:42 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> >
> > > > +Optional properties:
> > > > +- ti,pmic-shutdown-cont
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:11:45AM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> From these two threads we can infer that this is handled in power_off
> sequence only. And this is feature of PMIC to go to shutdown mode nothing
> to be fixed in silicon. PWR_EN line can be connected to any of these like
> PRCM
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:51:19, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:11:45AM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
>
> > From these two threads we can infer that this is handled in power_off
> > sequence only. And this is feature of PMIC to go to shutdown mode nothing
> > to be fixed in sil
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:49:58AM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> Earlier you have a comment on this thread, I am adding my comments
> on top of it. Sorry if I am in wrong direction.
Ah, I see. I was just commenting because Benoit was asking if this
should be supported with a standard framew
Hi Mark,
On 11/14/2012 08:00 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:49:58AM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
>
>> Earlier you have a comment on this thread, I am adding my comments
>> on top of it. Sorry if I am in wrong direction.
>
> Ah, I see. I was just commenting because Benoit
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:08:49AM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> I was wondering that, because exposing a pin to control the whole PMIC
> low power mode seems to be something that should be generic enough to be
> handled by the regulator framework.
Having something that's controlled by software
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 15:54:53, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:08:49AM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>
> > I was wondering that, because exposing a pin to control the whole PMIC
> > low power mode seems to be something that should be generic enough to be
> > handled by the regulat
12 matches
Mail list logo
