> -Original Message-
> From: Balbi, Felipe
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 6:04 PM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Cousson, Benoit; t...@atomide.com;
> khil...@deeprootsystems.com; Balbi, Felipe
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] omap4: Temporar
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:24:12AM -0500, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
Updated version attached.
attaching is generally not a good idea, but if you do so, at least use
.diff as extension (or .patch or .txt) so that most mutt users will see
it dumped onto the messaged.
I think that if you att
On 9/9/2010 7:47 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 9/9/2010 2:07 PM, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
Hi Santosh,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 07:02:46AM -0500, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
Felipe is suggesting not to add this support where as you want to
have this support.
Sorry if I haven't understood the comment
tomide.com;
> khil...@deeprootsystems.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/7] omap4: Temporary fix silicon version detection
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Balbi, Felipe
> > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 5:38 PM
> > To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> > Cc: Cousson,
> -Original Message-
> From: Balbi, Felipe
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 5:38 PM
> To: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Cc: Cousson, Benoit; Balbi, Felipe; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
> t...@atomide.com; khil...@deeprootsystems.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] omap4: Temporar
On 9/9/2010 2:07 PM, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
Hi Santosh,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 07:02:46AM -0500, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
Felipe is suggesting not to add this support where as you want to
have this support.
Sorry if I haven't understood the comment. Care to clarify
no, I suggested not to rev
Hi Santosh,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 07:02:46AM -0500, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
Felipe is suggesting not to add this support where as you want to
have this support.
Sorry if I haven't understood the comment. Care to clarify
no, I suggested not to revert :-) So, just change the comment saying
> -Original Message-
> From: Cousson, Benoit
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 5:17 PM
> To: Balbi, Felipe
> Cc: Shilimkar, Santosh; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; t...@atomide.com;
> khil...@deeprootsystems.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] omap4: Temporary fix sili
Hi Santosh,
On 9/9/2010 1:42 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:23:10AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
@@ -308,6 +308,16 @@ static void __init omap4_check_revision(void)
hawkeye = (idcode>> 12)& 0x;
rev = (idcode>> 28)& 0xff;
+ /*
+*
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:23:10AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
@@ -308,6 +308,16 @@ static void __init omap4_check_revision(void)
hawkeye = (idcode >> 12) & 0x;
rev = (idcode >> 28) & 0xff;
+ /*
+* FIXME: This patch should be reverted later.
+*
Few initial omap4 es2 samples IDCODE is same as es1. This patch
uses ARM cpuid register to detect the ES version for such samples
This patch can be reverted once all the samples gets replaced
with new lot.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 10 ++
1 files
11 matches
Mail list logo
