On 11/08/2012 10:55 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 11/07/2012 05:43 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Wednesday 07 November 2012 05:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2012 04:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>
Looks sensible considering alternative WAs.
Acked-by: Santosh Shi
On 11/07/2012 05:43 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2012 05:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 11/07/2012 04:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>
>>> Looks sensible considering alternative WAs.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar
>>
>> Thanks. With further thought I think tha
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 05:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 11/07/2012 04:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Looks sensible considering alternative WAs.
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar
Thanks. With further thought I think that it would be best to combine
patches #2 and #3. Really the main motiva
On 11/07/2012 04:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Looks sensible considering alternative WAs.
>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar
Thanks. With further thought I think that it would be best to combine
patches #2 and #3. Really the main motivation here is the errata
workaround and without actually
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 01:01 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
Errata Titles:
i103: Delay needed to read some GP timer, WD timer and sync timer registers
after wakeup (OMAP3/4)
i767: Delay needed to read some GP timer registers after wakeup (OMAP5)
Description (i103/i767):
If a General Purpose
Errata Titles:
i103: Delay needed to read some GP timer, WD timer and sync timer registers
after wakeup (OMAP3/4)
i767: Delay needed to read some GP timer registers after wakeup (OMAP5)
Description (i103/i767):
If a General Purpose Timer (GPTimer) is in posted mode (TSICR [2].POSTED=1),
due
