On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:22:32AM +0530, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 07:23:15PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 07-03-2011 5:52, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Blindly setting a 1.2V setting
Hm, seems tautological...
As a non native English speaker, I would
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Blindly setting a 1.2V setting in the initial structure may not even
match the default voltages stored in the voltage table which are
supported for the domain. For example, OMAP3430 core domain does not
use 1.2V and ends up generating a warning on the first
Hello.
On 07-03-2011 5:52, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Blindly setting a 1.2V setting
Hm, seems tautological...
As a non native English speaker, I would like to understand how we could
improve this. I suppose you mean Blindly setting 1.2V is better here. Am i
correct?
Yes.
WBR, Sergei
--
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 07:23:15PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 07-03-2011 5:52, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Blindly setting a 1.2V setting
Hm, seems tautological...
As a non native English speaker, I would like to understand how we could
improve this. I suppose you mean Blindly
Hello.
On 05-03-2011 18:29, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Blindly setting a 1.2V setting
Hm, seems tautological...
in the initial structure may not even
match the default voltages stored in the voltage table which are
supported for the domain. For example, OMAP3430 core domain does not
use 1.2V
Sergei Shtylyov wrote, on 03/06/2011 07:07 PM:
Blindly setting a 1.2V setting
Hm, seems tautological...
As a non native English speaker, I would like to understand how we could
improve this. I suppose you mean Blindly setting 1.2V is better here.
Am i correct?
in the initial
Blindly setting a 1.2V setting in the initial structure may not even
match the default voltages stored in the voltage table which are
supported for the domain. For example, OMAP3430 core domain does not
use 1.2V and ends up generating a warning on the first transition.
Further, since
