* Ramirez Luna, Omar omar.rami...@ti.com [110215 16:11]:
If you have to do several platform_get_irq_byname to get this one, I'd
prefer to get rid of that name for OMAP4. It will make mailbox irq
consistent with the other hwmods.
I was thinking to standardize the names to be mbox0..mboxN
Hi Tony,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Ramirez Luna, Omar omar.rami...@ti.com [110215 16:11]:
If you have to do several platform_get_irq_byname to get this one, I'd
prefer to get rid of that name for OMAP4. It will make mailbox irq
consistent
Hi Benoit,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote:
+static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info omap44xx_mailbox_irqs[] = {
+ { .name = mbox, .irq = 26 + OMAP44XX_IRQ_GIC_START, },
The original entry was unnamed since it is an unique entry and thus does not
need
Hi Omar,
On 2/15/2011 10:55 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
Hi Benoit,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Cousson, Benoitb-cous...@ti.com wrote:
+static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info omap44xx_mailbox_irqs[] = {
+ { .name = mbox, .irq = 26 + OMAP44XX_IRQ_GIC_START, },
The original entry was
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com wrote:
It is this way instead of plain platform_get_irq because omap2420 has
two interrupt sources to MPU and mailbox driver uses
platform_get_irq_byname to get the irq number.
This is what I was thinking, except that on
Hi Omar,
I found one minor change wrt to the original that I'd like to understand
better.
On 2/2/2011 8:27 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
From: Benoit Coussonb-cous...@ti.com
Mailbox hwmod data for omap4.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Coussonb-cous...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez
From: Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com
Mailbox hwmod data for omap4.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna omar.rami...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 67
1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 0
