RE: [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

Hi Omar, On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: > To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree. > > Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested. > I think the mailbox code needs a cleanup similar to what you had proposed earlier [1] before the device tree support is add

Re: [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

Hi Vaibhav, Somehow I missed this mail. On 2 May 2012 00:42, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > Hi Omar, > > On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: >> To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree. >> >> Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested. >> > > I think the mailbox code n

Re: [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

Hi Tony, Benoit, On 1 May 2012 12:47, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: > To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree. > > Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested. > > Omar Ramirez Luna (2): >  OMAP: mailbox: add device tree support >  arm/dts: OMAP2+: Add mailbox nodes > >  .../devicetree/bind

Re: [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

On 5/2/2012 7:42 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: Hi Omar, On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree. Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested. I think the mailbox code needs a cleanup similar to what you had proposed earlier [1

Re: [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

Hi, On 24 May 2012 10:44, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > On 5/2/2012 7:42 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: >> >> Hi Omar, >> >> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: >>> >>> To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree. >>> >>> Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested. >> >> >> I