Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 07:54:14PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
> > sfdisk -d already works most of the time. Not as a verbatim tool (I
> > actually semi-frequently use a "sfdisk -d /dev/hda | sfdisk" invocation
> > as a way to _rewrite_ the CHS fields to other values after chang
I'm making raid 5 consisting of 4 disks, 500 GB each, with one spare
standby. In future to be expanded with extra disks. Server will be running
with ups, and with extra machine doing daily rsync backup of the system and
stuff deemed important. On top of the raid, there will probably be simple
l
Hello Andrew ,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Andrew Burgess wrote:
The 'MCE's have been ongoing for sometime . I have replaced every item
in the system except the chassis & scsi backplane & power supply(750Watts) .
Everything . MB,cpu,memory,scsi controllers, ...
These M
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:59:41 +1000
Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So reiserfs thinks the devices is 64K larger than it really is. I
> wonder how that happened.
>resize_reiserfs -s -64K /dev/md1
Neil, I discovered how the "64k larger" issue happened...
It was my faul
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 08:35:45AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On 20 Jul 2007, at 06:13, Al Boldi wrote:
> >As always, a good friend of mine managed to scratch my partion
> >table by
> >cat'ing /dev/full into /dev/sda. I was able to push him out of the
> >way, but
> >at least the first
On 07/20/2007 06:06 PM, Theodore Tso wrote:
It wouldn't be that hard to put a backup partition table at the beginning
of an ext2/3 filesystem. No one is currently using the space between
offset 512 and 1023 bytes, and it would be an easy place to stash a
backup copy of the partition table. We
On 6/1/06, NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When an array has a bitmap, a device can be removed and re-added
and only blocks changes since the removal (as recorded in the bitmap)
will be resynced.
Neil,
Does the same apply when a bitmap-enabled raid1's member goes faulty?
Meaning even if
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Quick question-- under Kernel 2.4 without 2TB support enabled, the only
other option is to use auto-carving to get the maximum amount of space
easily, however, after doing this (2TB, 2TB, 1.8TB) for a 10 x
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Quick question-- under Kernel 2.4 without 2TB support enabled, the only other
option is to use auto-carving to get the maximum amount of space easily,
however, after doing this (2TB, 2TB, 1.8TB) for a 10 x 750GB array, only the
first partition remain
Quick question-- under Kernel 2.4 without 2TB support enabled, the only
other option is to use auto-carving to get the maximum amount of space
easily, however, after doing this (2TB, 2TB, 1.8TB) for a 10 x 750GB
array, only the first partition remains afer reboot.
Before reboot:
/dev/sdb1 (2T
Hello Neil,
Thanks for the confirmations!
It's all very clear now. Case closed.
Best,
Seb.
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
| On Saturday July 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| >
| > Hi Neil,
| >
| >
| > | > Could you tell me if such a mechanism exists in mdadm?
| > | > Or should I accept
mullaly wrote:
[]
> All works well until a system reboot. md2 appears to be brought up before
> md0 and md1 which causes the raid to start without two of its drives.
>
> Is there anyway to fix this?
How about listing the arrays in proper order in mdadm.conf ?
/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 07:54:54PM +0200, Seb wrote:
Dear all,
First I'd like to thank you for the great work you've done with mdadm.
It's flexible, powerful and reasonably easy to use.
I have a question that seems both important for the redundancy of my RAID6
devices and too sharp for me, my
On Saturday July 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Neil,
>
>
> | > Could you tell me if such a mechanism exists in mdadm?
> | > Or should I accept the "loss" of the 150 GB?
> | When you give mdadm a collection of drives to turn into a RAID array,
> | use bases the size of the array on the smal
14 matches
Mail list logo