raid5: bugs?

1999-01-31 Thread Stephen Costaras
Now that I'm back on the list I wanted to bring this up. For the past while running linux 2.2.0pre6, & 2.2.0 release I've seen the following on one of my volumes: Jan 21 19:49:09 news kernel: raid5: bug: stripe->bh_new[6], sector 2643680 exists Jan 21 19:49:10 news kernel: raid5: bh c2

raid0 kernel 2.2.1 raid0145-19990128

1999-01-31 Thread Jens Brambring
Hello, when I try to start my raid0 with raidstart --all I get the following messages in /var/log/messages: kernel: (read) sdb1's sb offset: 4233024 [events: ] kernel: (read) sdc1's sb offset: 4233024 [events: ] kernel: autorun ... kernel: considering sdc1 ... kernel: adding sdc

quiet list? or is it me?

1999-01-31 Thread Stephen Costaras
I've noticed that I don't seem to be getting any new posts from this list in the past several weeks. Was wondering if it's just been unearthly quiet or if something might be going on with the RBL (Real-time Blackhole List) w/ sendmail and this mail-list. If it's the first I have a question conc

persistant superblocks and raid 0

1999-01-31 Thread Tom Brown
from parser.c if ((val == 0) || (val == -1)) array->param.not_persistent = 1; else array->param.not_persistent = 0; return 0; The default 'mkraid' setting for raid 0 is not_persistent superblocks, whi